【摘要】：國內(nèi)外大跨徑預(yù)應(yīng)力混凝土連續(xù)剛構(gòu)橋在運(yùn)營多年后相繼出現(xiàn)跨中下?lián)虾土后w開裂,裂縫和變形的相互耦合更加劇了橋梁的病害,嚴(yán)重影響到橋梁結(jié)構(gòu)的安全和正常使用性能�？紤]預(yù)應(yīng)力筋松弛和混凝土收縮徐變相互耦合的預(yù)應(yīng)力損失計(jì)算中,分析方法的正確性和收縮徐變預(yù)測(cè)模型的準(zhǔn)確性決定了計(jì)算結(jié)果的精度性。研究表明,收縮徐變預(yù)測(cè)模型的誤差會(huì)比計(jì)算方法帶來的誤差更明顯。國內(nèi)外廣泛采用的混凝土收縮徐變預(yù)測(cè)模型,是基于大量的普通混凝土長期試驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)經(jīng)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法擬合的公式,與目前廣泛使用的高強(qiáng)度混凝土結(jié)構(gòu)不符。為研究混凝土收縮徐變預(yù)測(cè)模型對(duì)連續(xù)剛構(gòu)橋預(yù)應(yīng)力損失和預(yù)拱度的影響,選取NCHRP 496報(bào)告提供的高強(qiáng)度混凝土收縮徐變預(yù)測(cè)模型和現(xiàn)橋規(guī)中JTG D62-04預(yù)測(cè)模型,以薛家壩2#大橋?yàn)橹饕治鰧?duì)象,開展了基于高強(qiáng)混凝土收縮徐變模式的預(yù)應(yīng)力損失與預(yù)拱度的數(shù)值計(jì)算研究:①系統(tǒng)歸納現(xiàn)廣泛使用的各種收縮徐變預(yù)測(cè)模型和基于高強(qiáng)度混凝土試驗(yàn)的預(yù)測(cè)模型NCHRP 496。根據(jù)實(shí)際指定條件,對(duì)比分析各種模型的預(yù)測(cè)值差異和特點(diǎn),主要分析構(gòu)件理論厚度和混凝土強(qiáng)度因素對(duì)各種預(yù)測(cè)模型的影響,重點(diǎn)對(duì)比JTG D62-04和NCHRP 496因混凝土強(qiáng)度的變化所引起的預(yù)測(cè)值之間的差異;②基于按齡期調(diào)整的有效模量法,開展考慮混凝土收縮徐變、預(yù)應(yīng)力筋松弛和普通鋼筋相互作用的截面應(yīng)力時(shí)效重分布計(jì)算方法的研究,推導(dǎo)出相應(yīng)的預(yù)應(yīng)力長期損失的計(jì)算公式;③重點(diǎn)依托實(shí)際工程薛家壩2#大橋,利用Midas/Civil有限元分析程序,對(duì)比分析JTG D62-04和NCHRP 496對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)長期預(yù)應(yīng)力損失和豎向撓度的影響差異。以赫章特大橋作為輔助算例,驗(yàn)證計(jì)算分析結(jié)果的正確性和適用性。研究表明,現(xiàn)行橋規(guī)JTG D62-04收縮徐變預(yù)測(cè)模型未能準(zhǔn)確考慮高強(qiáng)度混凝土的影響。JTG D62-04有高估高強(qiáng)度混凝土徐變特性和低估收縮應(yīng)變特性的趨勢(shì),并且低估了因混凝土收縮徐變引起的長期預(yù)應(yīng)力損失值,造成施工預(yù)拱度的設(shè)置偏小,這在一定程度上解釋了橋梁跨中下?lián)线^大的普遍現(xiàn)象。因此,為了能夠準(zhǔn)確分析高強(qiáng)度混凝土收縮徐變效應(yīng),建議規(guī)范JTG D62-04提供的收縮徐變預(yù)測(cè)模型需針對(duì)高強(qiáng)度混凝土加以修正完善。
[Abstract]:Long span prestressed concrete continuous rigid frame bridges at home and abroad have appeared in succession after many years of operation of mid-span deflection and beam cracking. The coupling of cracks and deformation exacerbates the disease of bridges, which seriously affects the safety and normal performance of bridge structures. The accuracy of the calculation results is determined by the correctness of the analytical method and the accuracy of the prediction model of shrinkage and creep in the calculation of prestress losses which are coupled with the relaxation of prestressed tendons and the shrinkage and creep of concrete. The results show that the error of the model is more obvious than that of the calculation method. The widely used concrete shrinkage and creep prediction model at home and abroad is based on a large number of ordinary concrete long-term test data fitted by statistical method, which is not consistent with the widely used high strength concrete structure. In order to study the influence of concrete shrinkage and creep prediction model on the prestress loss and precamber of continuous rigid frame bridge, the high strength concrete shrinkage and creep prediction model and the JTG D62-04 prediction model provided by NCHRP 496 are selected. Taking Xuejiaba2# Bridge as the main analysis object, Numerical calculation of prestress loss and pre-arch degree based on shrinkage and creep mode of high strength concrete is carried out. 1 various kinds of shrinkage and creep prediction models used widely and NCHRP 496 model based on high strength concrete test are systematically summarized. According to the actual specified conditions, the differences and characteristics of the prediction values of various models are compared and analyzed. The influence of the theoretical thickness of components and the strength of concrete on the prediction models is mainly analyzed. The difference between the predicted values of JTG D62-04 and NCHRP 496 caused by the change of concrete strength is compared. (2) based on the age-adjusted effective modulus method, the calculation method of cross-section stress aging redistribution considering the interaction of concrete shrinkage and creep, prestressed tendons relaxation and ordinary reinforcement is studied. The formula for calculating the long-term loss of prestressing force is deduced. (3) based on the actual project of Xuejiaba2# Bridge, the difference of the influence of JTG D62-04 and NCHRP 496 on the long-term prestress loss and vertical deflection of the structure is analyzed by using Midas/Civil finite element analysis program. The accuracy and applicability of the calculation results are verified by taking the Hezhang Bridge as an auxiliary example. The results show that the current JTG D62-04 shrinkage and creep prediction model of bridge gauge can not accurately consider the influence of high strength concrete. JTG D62-04 has the tendency of overestimating the creep characteristics of high strength concrete and underestimating the shrinkage strain characteristic. The long-term prestress loss caused by shrinkage and creep of concrete is underestimated, and the setting of pre-camber is small, which to some extent explains the common phenomenon of excessive deflection in bridge span. Therefore, in order to accurately analyze the shrinkage and creep effect of high strength concrete, it is suggested that the prediction model of shrinkage and creep provided by JTG D62-04 should be modified and perfected for high strength concrete.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：U441;U448.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 潘鉆峰;呂志濤;劉釗;;考慮收縮、徐變和松弛相互影響的預(yù)應(yīng)力長期損失計(jì)算[J];現(xiàn)代交通技術(shù);2010年05期

2 楊旭;汪維安;張俊琪;;布柳河大橋收縮徐變模型的比選[J];科技資訊;2006年24期

，

本文編號(hào)：2356560