本文選題：文化產(chǎn)業(yè) + 科技創(chuàng)新能力��； 參考：《天津大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技的不斷深化,文化產(chǎn)業(yè)也在發(fā)生深刻變革,促進(jìn)文化與科技的深化融合,提高文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的科技含量,提升文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的國際競爭力,成為各區(qū)域文化發(fā)展的方向。天津地處京津冀城市群交匯點(diǎn),文化底蘊(yùn)深厚,但在與科技的融合上、文化體制上等方面還有待提升。因此,推進(jìn)天津市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技融合,提升其科技創(chuàng)新能力成為趨勢。論文以文化產(chǎn)業(yè)、科技創(chuàng)新力、兩者之間互動關(guān)系為理論指導(dǎo),利用比較研究、因子分析法等對天津的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)進(jìn)行科技創(chuàng)新力的研究。首先,闡述了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)、科技創(chuàng)新能力、文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技創(chuàng)新的互動關(guān)系等相關(guān)概念,進(jìn)而提出本研究對于這些概念的界定。第二,從科技創(chuàng)新投入和產(chǎn)出兩個維度對天津市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的科技創(chuàng)新能力分析,得出評價指標(biāo)體系,從縱向和橫向兩方面展開;第三,得出實(shí)證結(jié)果:政策因素和市場因素是影響天津文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的科技創(chuàng)新的關(guān)鍵;最后,針對實(shí)證結(jié)果,提出本市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)在科技創(chuàng)新上實(shí)現(xiàn)能力提升的對策建議。論文主要研究結(jié)論有:從縱向角度,天津市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策因素穩(wěn)定,說明國家和天津市在對天津市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的政策上還是積極推動的。而市場因素波動不定,這就導(dǎo)致其整體科技創(chuàng)新能力波動。從橫向角度,天津處于四個直轄市之一,也處于京津冀一體化區(qū)域的關(guān)鍵位置。在橫向比較的五個區(qū)域中,天津的市場因子和綜合科技創(chuàng)新能力都居于中間水平,而政策因子方面,天津卻排到最后。因此提出建議,從政策因素和市場因素兩方面提升科技創(chuàng)新力。政策因素包含財(cái)政金融、文化設(shè)施平臺建設(shè)以及人才方面,市場因素包括完善市場制度、培育龍頭企業(yè)、創(chuàng)新文化產(chǎn)品新角度。
[Abstract]:With the continuous deepening of economy and science and technology, the cultural industry is also undergoing profound changes, promoting the deepening integration of culture and science and technology, increasing the scientific and technological content of the cultural industry, and enhancing the international competitiveness of the cultural industry. Become the direction of regional cultural development. Tianjin is located at the confluence of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Therefore, it is a trend to promote the integration of cultural industry and science and technology in Tianjin. Based on the theory of cultural industry, scientific and technological innovation and the interaction between them, this paper studies the scientific and technological innovation ability of Tianjin's cultural industry by means of comparative study and factor analysis. Firstly, the related concepts such as cultural industry, the ability of scientific and technological innovation, the interaction between cultural industry and scientific and technological innovation are expounded, and the definition of these concepts in this study is put forward. Second, from the two dimensions of input and output of scientific and technological innovation to Tianjin's cultural industry innovation capacity analysis, the evaluation index system, from the vertical and horizontal aspects of the development; third, The empirical results: policy factors and market factors are the key to the scientific and technological innovation of Tianjin cultural industry. Finally, in view of the empirical results, the author puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions to improve the ability of scientific and technological innovation of the cultural industry in this city. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: from the vertical point of view, the policy factors of Tianjin's cultural industry are stable, which indicates that the government and Tianjin are still actively promoting the policy of Tianjin's cultural industry. But the market factor fluctuates, this causes its overall science and technology innovation ability fluctuation. From the horizontal point of view, Tianjin is one of the four municipalities directly under the Central Government and a key position in the integrated region of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. In the horizontal comparison of the five regions, Tianjin's market factors and comprehensive scientific and technological innovation ability are at the intermediate level, but Tianjin ranks last in terms of policy factors. Therefore, put forward suggestions, from the policy factors and market factors to improve the innovation of science and technology. The policy factors include finance and finance, construction of cultural facilities platform and talents. Market factors include perfecting market system, cultivating leading enterprises and innovating new angles of cultural products.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：G124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮臻;;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)構(gòu)建的理論研究[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2015年03期

2 金哲松;陳方;韋蘇P";;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略差異化研究——基于國別比較的視角[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2015年05期

3 高書生;;我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的總體狀況和主要特征[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2015年03期

4 王有志;莊雨婷;姚緣;李豐男;;基于創(chuàng)新診斷的企業(yè)科技創(chuàng)新發(fā)展對策研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2015年09期

5 朱佳俊;程蓉;;文化企業(yè)科技創(chuàng)新能力評價指標(biāo)體系研究[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2015年08期

6 尹宏;;文化科技融合促進(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[J];江西社會科學(xué);2015年04期

7 解學(xué)芳;韓曉芳;;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)科技創(chuàng)新能力研究:現(xiàn)狀研判與革新路徑[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2015年04期

8 談國新;郝挺雷;;科技創(chuàng)新視角下我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)向全球價值鏈高端躍升的路徑[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2015年02期

9 韓曉明;王洪燕;;基于熵值法的高校科技創(chuàng)新能力評價[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2015年01期

10 安蓉;馬亮;;西部地區(qū)地方高�？萍紕�(chuàng)新能力評價研究[J];科研管理;2015年S1期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 于平;;科技：文化發(fā)展的核心支撐和重要引擎[N];光明日報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔡晶;大慶文化產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力評價研究[D];東北石油大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1934698