發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-10 09:43

【摘要】：在1980年前后,西方發(fā)達(dá)的國家普遍出現(xiàn)了城市衰敗景象。為了解決這日益嚴(yán)重的城市問題,先后興起了城市重建、城市改造、城市更新、城市復(fù)興等思潮,來解決城市出現(xiàn)的衰敗問題,成果顯著。隨著中國城市化的進(jìn)程,北京市某些地區(qū)也出現(xiàn)了城市衰敗現(xiàn)象,又在北京土地有稀缺的情況下,急需當(dāng)代新的思想—城市復(fù)興,來解決問題。與城市更新相比,城市復(fù)興不但關(guān)注物質(zhì)空間的更新,更關(guān)注城市或社區(qū)整體活力的再生,關(guān)注廣泛的經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)、政治、文化、生態(tài)等要素�？沙掷m(xù)發(fā)展的觀念,將兩者區(qū)分開來。本文的研究內(nèi)容是北京地區(qū)的城市復(fù)興案例。從城市復(fù)興的主導(dǎo)方這個(gè)角度入手,根據(jù)實(shí)際情況,將其分為民間、政府、市場主導(dǎo)三種類型:798藝術(shù)區(qū)是民間主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興模式;首鋼工業(yè)區(qū)是政府主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興模式;大柵欄區(qū)是多方主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興模式研究。研究的方法是:首先梳理其城市復(fù)興過程。其次對(duì)過程中的主要要素進(jìn)行分析。最后對(duì)其復(fù)興模式進(jìn)行總結(jié)。通過研究,作者認(rèn)為:1)民間主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興能提供積極的改造活力;政府主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興保障政策資源優(yōu)先性;市場主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興提供了充足的改造資金。這些都是保證城市復(fù)興得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的有利保障。2)北京各方主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興的構(gòu)建和發(fā)展呈現(xiàn)出多元模式。民間、政府、市場任何一方主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興模式,其他方都要積極參與,才能完成最終的城市復(fù)興,未來的城市復(fù)興模式必然走向多方協(xié)作參與的城市復(fù)興模式。希望通過本次對(duì)北京各方主導(dǎo)的城市復(fù)興模式研究,能為今后北京及其他地區(qū)的城市復(fù)興提供參考。
[Abstract]:In 1980 or so, developed countries in the West generally appeared in the urban decline. In order to solve this increasingly serious urban problem, a series of ideological trends such as urban reconstruction, urban transformation, urban renewal and urban renewal have been developed to solve the problem of urban decay, with remarkable results. With the process of urbanization in China, there is a phenomenon of urban decay in some areas of Beijing, and in the case of scarcity of land in Beijing, it is urgent to solve the problem with a new contemporary thought-city revival. Compared with urban renewal, urban renaissance not only pays attention to the renewal of material space, but also pays more attention to the regeneration of the whole vitality of the city or community, and to the extensive economic, social, political, cultural and ecological elements. The concept of sustainable development distinguishes the two. The research content of this paper is a case of urban renewal in Beijing area. From the perspective of the leading party of urban renaissance, according to the actual situation, it can be divided into three types: folk, government and market leading three types: 798 Art District is the folk leading urban revival mode, Shougang Industrial Zone is the government-led urban revival mode; Dashang District is a multi-leading model of urban revival. The research methods are as follows: firstly, combing the process of urban renaissance. Secondly, the main elements of the process are analyzed. Finally, the paper summarizes the model of its revival. Through the research, the author thinks that the folk leading urban renaissance can provide the positive transformation vigor, the government leads the city renaissance to guarantee the policy resource priority, and the market-oriented city renaissance provides sufficient reconstruction funds. These are the favorable guarantees to ensure the realization of urban renaissance. 2) the construction and development of the urban renaissance led by all parties in Beijing show multiple patterns. In order to complete the final urban renaissance, the civil, government and market should take an active part in the model of urban renaissance, and the future model of urban renaissance will inevitably move to the mode of multi-party cooperation. It is hoped that this study on the urban regeneration model led by all parties in Beijing can provide a reference for the future urban renaissance in Beijing and other regions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TU984

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉瑾;劉艷林;鄭巧依;邢曉娟;;北京大柵欄地區(qū)創(chuàng)意店鋪空間集聚現(xiàn)象評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];北京規(guī)劃建設(shè);2018年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2261296