發(fā)布時間：2018-05-30 04:21

  本文選題：綠色發(fā)展 + 全要素能源效率��； 參考：《西北大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：能源作為工業(yè)發(fā)展的“血液”,一直在各國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展中擁有至關重要的位置,推動了經(jīng)濟的高速增長,而自工業(yè)革命以來,能源的過度開采與不當利用所帶來的生態(tài)環(huán)境惡化卻日益嚴峻。我國作為世界上最大的發(fā)展中工業(yè)國,更是環(huán)境污染與經(jīng)濟增長問題并存的典型代表。為此,我國政府先后提出科學發(fā)展觀、低碳經(jīng)濟、循環(huán)經(jīng)濟等綠色發(fā)展思想,在黨的十八屆五中全會上更是正式提出“綠色發(fā)展”理念,并將其列入我國“十三五”規(guī)劃的“五大發(fā)展理念”之中,表明我國政府今后面對環(huán)境污染治理的決心和力度。在綠色發(fā)展視角下,本文首先回顧了綠色發(fā)展和全要素能源效率的相關理論,對文獻進行了分層梳理,并在此基礎上基于SBM-Undesirable方向距離函數(shù)和Global Malmquist-Luenberger指數(shù)方法綜合考察了能源、資本、勞動投入與地區(qū)生產(chǎn)總值、主要污染排放量等期望、非期望產(chǎn)出指標,測算了 2003-2013年間我國省際的全要素能源效率,并從時間與空間多重角度考量其時空分異特征,尤其是重點考察了絲綢之路經(jīng)濟帶、傳統(tǒng)三大區(qū)域省份的能源效率,以期全面直觀的展現(xiàn)我國區(qū)域能源效率變動。最后文章利用基于全局生產(chǎn)技術集的GML指數(shù)分解,從技術效率變動和技術進步方面深度剖析了我國全要素能源效率的變動成因,此外,本文還將非綠色發(fā)展視角下的能源效率測度與之對比,再次論證“波特假說”的有效性。結果表明:我國尚處在EKC曲線左側,省際能源低效率普遍且存在繼續(xù)下降的潛在可能;存在東、中、西部地區(qū)區(qū)域集聚階梯狀分布,重點考察區(qū)域結果與之一致;在對效率進行分解后發(fā)現(xiàn)增長主要源于技術進步;重新檢驗了“波特假說”的有效性,肯定了綠色發(fā)展理論的生命力,為綠色經(jīng)濟下我國能源的供給側改革提供有益助力。
[Abstract]:Energy, as the "blood" of industrial development, has been playing a vital role in the economic development of all countries and has promoted the rapid economic growth. Since the industrial revolution, However, the deterioration of ecological environment caused by excessive exploitation and improper use of energy is becoming more and more serious. As the largest developing industrial country in the world, China is a typical representative of the coexistence of environmental pollution and economic growth. Therefore, our government has put forward the concept of scientific development, low-carbon economy, circular economy and other green development ideas, and put forward the concept of "green development" at the Fifth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee. It is listed in the "five Development Concepts" of the 13th Five-Year Plan of our country, which indicates the determination and strength of our government to face the environmental pollution control in the future. From the perspective of green development, this paper firstly reviews the related theories of green development and total factor energy efficiency, and combs the literature in layers, and then, based on the SBM-Undesirable direction distance function and Global Malmquist-Luenberger exponent method, the energy is comprehensively investigated. Capital, labor input and regional gross domestic product (GDP), major pollution emissions and other expectations, and non-expected output indicators, have calculated the energy efficiency of all factors among provinces in China from 2003 to 2013, and considered the temporal and spatial differentiation characteristics from the point of view of multiple aspects of time and space. Especially, the paper focuses on the energy efficiency of the Silk Road economic belt and the traditional three regional provinces, in order to show the change of regional energy efficiency in China completely and intuitively. Finally, by using the GML exponent decomposition based on the global production technology set, this paper analyzes the causes of the change of total factor energy efficiency in China from the aspects of technological efficiency change and technological progress. This paper also compares the energy efficiency measurement from the perspective of non-green development to demonstrate the validity of the Porter hypothesis again. The results show that China is still on the left side of the EKC curve, the inter-provincial energy efficiency is widespread and there is a potential to continue to decline, the eastern, middle and western regions are concentrated in ladder distribution, and the results are consistent with the results. After decomposing the efficiency, the author finds that the growth mainly comes from technological progress, retests the validity of the "Porter hypothesis", affirms the vitality of the green development theory, and provides a beneficial aid for the supply-side reform of China's energy under the green economy.
【學位授予單位】：西北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F224;F426.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 林俐;周鵬;鄒蘭青;;基于新能源產(chǎn)業(yè)導向的電力系統(tǒng)能源效率評估及影響因素分析[J];電力建設;2017年01期

2 陳龍;李金昌;程開明;;中國城市能源效率測算[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟與管理;2016年07期

3 李學春;;論中國共產(chǎn)黨與中國優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化的關系[J];甘肅行政學院學報;2016年02期

4 張志輝;;中國區(qū)域能源效率演變及其影響因素[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟技術經(jīng)濟研究;2015年08期

5 王兆華;豐超;;中國區(qū)域全要素能源效率及其影響因素分析——基于2003-2010年的省際面板數(shù)據(jù)[J];系統(tǒng)工程理論與實踐;2015年06期

6 王興貴;;甘孜州農(nóng)業(yè)綠色發(fā)展SWOT分析與對策研究[J];浙江農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2014年04期

7 陳關聚;;中國制造業(yè)全要素能源效率及影響因素研究——基于面板數(shù)據(jù)的隨機前沿分析[J];中國軟科學;2014年01期

8 王強;樊杰;伍世代;;1990-2009年中國區(qū)域能源效率時空分異特征與成因[J];地理研究;2014年01期

9 師博;沈坤榮;;政府干預、經(jīng)濟集聚與能源效率[J];管理世界;2013年10期

10 鄭麗琳;朱啟貴;;納入能源環(huán)境因素的中國全要素生產(chǎn)率再估算[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2013年07期

相關博士學位論文 前4條

1 張清華;中國區(qū)域工業(yè)能源效率時空效應研究[D];山西財經(jīng)大學;2015年

2 黃寶敏;能源效率、環(huán)境約束與我國經(jīng)濟增長質量研究[D];吉林大學;2015年

3 吳琦;中國省域能源效率評價研究[D];大連理工大學;2010年

4 魏楚;中國能源效率問題研究[D];浙江大學;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 雷振宇;新常態(tài)下中國經(jīng)濟增長質量的評價與提升路徑研究[D];西北大學;2015年

2 曹素溪;陜西省區(qū)域經(jīng)濟增長的全要素生產(chǎn)率研究[D];西北大學;2015年

3 蔡娟;基于環(huán)境庫茲涅茨曲線的陜西省環(huán)境質量與經(jīng)濟增長關系研究[D];西北大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1953904