發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-24 13:05

【摘要】：本文基于法律文本對(duì)地方立法權(quán)限的規(guī)定,結(jié)合以往學(xué)者對(duì)地方立法的研究,來進(jìn)一步明晰地方立法的權(quán)限。不同于以往學(xué)者將地方立法權(quán)作為一個(gè)整體,探討地方不同立法形式之間及其與中央的權(quán)力劃分,本文將地方一般立法主體進(jìn)一步細(xì)化,分為省級(jí)、較大的市級(jí)及設(shè)區(qū)的市級(jí),對(duì)不同立法主體的立法權(quán)限分別討論并進(jìn)行權(quán)限區(qū)分。本文除了引言與最后的總結(jié)部分,共分四章,分述如下:第一章,對(duì)涉及地方立法權(quán)限的理論進(jìn)行梳理。包括地方立法權(quán)的涵義、權(quán)限范圍的涵義,并對(duì)我國(guó)目前地方立法范圍的特征進(jìn)行分析,然后提出規(guī)范地方立法范圍的意義。除了對(duì)地方立法范圍理論上的概括,本章還為目前我國(guó)地方立法的主體及各自的立法權(quán)限尋找法律依據(jù),為下文對(duì)其權(quán)限的具體探討奠定基礎(chǔ)。第二章,對(duì)各級(jí)地方立法權(quán)限進(jìn)行探討。對(duì)省一級(jí)立法權(quán)限的分析結(jié)合法律文本對(duì)中央與省級(jí)立法權(quán)限的分別規(guī)定,并考慮地方行使立法權(quán)需遵循的原則;對(duì)設(shè)區(qū)的市立法范圍在有爭(zhēng)議的立法事項(xiàng)上加以分析、細(xì)化;對(duì)于較大的市探討《立法法》修改前后帶來的立法權(quán)限范圍的變化情況。第三章,通過法律文本的規(guī)定及學(xué)者們對(duì)省級(jí)立法權(quán)限的探討,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)省級(jí)立法權(quán)限主要存在著范圍不明及權(quán)限較小的問題;較大的市存在應(yīng)對(duì)立法范圍變化帶來的問題;除較大的市之外的設(shè)區(qū)的市存在著立法權(quán)濫用、立法質(zhì)量低及加劇地方立法碎片化風(fēng)險(xiǎn);地方不同層級(jí)存在的立法權(quán)限重疊問題。第四章,筆者嘗試提出以上問題的解決建議。對(duì)于省級(jí)立法權(quán)限主要通過與中央立法權(quán)限的的區(qū)分來界定;對(duì)于較大的市來說可以適當(dāng)放開其權(quán)限并通過法律解釋加以固定;對(duì)于設(shè)區(qū)的市要審慎立法、加強(qiáng)立法隊(duì)伍建設(shè)、進(jìn)行立法后評(píng)估;對(duì)于權(quán)限重疊問題設(shè)區(qū)市能較好行使立法權(quán)的省級(jí)就不再涉及,省級(jí)主要負(fù)責(zé)設(shè)區(qū)市無法解決或需要省級(jí)統(tǒng)籌規(guī)劃的立法。
[Abstract]:Based on the provisions of the local legislative authority in the legal text and the previous research on the local legislation, this paper further clarifies the jurisdiction of the local legislation. Different from the previous scholars regarding the local legislative power as a whole and discussing the power division between the different local legislative forms and the central government, this paper further refines the local general legislative body, and divides it into the provincial level, the larger city level and the city level that is divided into districts. The legislative authority of different legislative subjects is discussed and differentiated respectively. In addition to the introduction and the last part of the summary, this paper is divided into four chapters, as follows: the first chapter, related to the theory of local legislative authority to comb. It includes the meaning of local legislative power and the meaning of the scope of jurisdiction, and analyzes the characteristics of the scope of local legislation at present in our country, and then puts forward the significance of standardizing the scope of local legislation. In addition to the theoretical summary of the scope of local legislation, this chapter also seeks the legal basis for the main body of local legislation and their respective legislative powers, and lays a foundation for the following specific discussion of the jurisdiction of local legislation. The second chapter discusses the jurisdiction of local legislation at all levels. The analysis of the legislative competence of the provincial level combined with the provisions of the legislative authority of the central and provincial levels in the legal texts, and the consideration of the principles to be followed in the exercise of the legislative power by the local authorities, the analysis of the legislative scope of the municipalities divided into districts on the controversial legislative matters, the refinement of the legislative powers of the central and provincial levels; For larger cities, the changes in the scope of legislative competence brought about by the revision of the Legislative Law are discussed. In the third chapter, through the provisions of the legal texts and the scholars' discussion on the provincial legislative authority, the author finds that the provincial legislative authority mainly has the problems of unclear scope and smaller jurisdiction, and the larger cities have the problems that should be brought about by the change of the legislative scope. There is abuse of legislative power, low quality of legislation and the risk of fragmentation of local legislation in the cities divided into districts except the larger cities, and the overlapping of legislative authority at different levels. In the fourth chapter, the author tries to put forward the solutions to the above problems. The provincial legislative authority is mainly defined by the distinction between the provincial legislative authority and the central legislative authority; for the larger city, it can be properly liberalized and fixed through legal interpretation; for the municipalities divided into districts, it is necessary to legislate prudently and strengthen the construction of the legislative team. After the legislation evaluation; for the overlapping jurisdiction of the city can better exercise the legislative power of the provincial level is no longer involved, the provincial level is mainly responsible for district cities can not solve or need provincial overall planning legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D927

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱振進(jìn);;地方立法權(quán)限之再審視[J];觀察與思考;2013年05期

2 鄧金菊;立法權(quán)限論[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年10期

3 劉劍文;完善我國(guó)稅收立法權(quán)限體制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2000年01期

4 汪珂;周煜;;淺議我國(guó)立法權(quán)限體制的現(xiàn)狀及完善[J];南通航運(yùn)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

5 紀(jì)榮榮;;人大常委會(huì)立法權(quán)限研究[J];人大研究;2011年11期

6 尹萬邦;;關(guān)于地方立法權(quán)限的探討[J];法學(xué)雜志;1986年03期

7 賈紅梅;;德國(guó)中央與地方立法權(quán)限的劃分及其關(guān)系[J];人大工作通訊;1995年21期

8 張錫恩;孔志國(guó);;關(guān)于規(guī)范立法權(quán)限和程序的思考[J];山東人大工作;1999年11期

9 賴祖勝;;略議地方立法權(quán)限[J];人民政壇;2008年03期

10 喬曉陽;中國(guó)中央和地方立法權(quán)限的劃分[J];行政法學(xué)研究;1993年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 沈百鑫;;德國(guó)水管理法的歷史與現(xiàn)狀[A];生態(tài)文明與林業(yè)法治--2010全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];2010年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 舒麗華;地方立法權(quán)限研究[N];貴州日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

2 海峽兩岸關(guān)系法學(xué)研究會(huì) 張自合;協(xié)議草案明確行政與立法權(quán)限[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

3 本報(bào)記者 陳麗平;進(jìn)一步劃清各立法機(jī)關(guān)權(quán)限[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

4 許安標(biāo);立法法對(duì)立法權(quán)限的配置[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2000年

5 北京市法學(xué)會(huì)立法學(xué)研究會(huì)副會(huì)長(zhǎng)兼秘書長(zhǎng) 首都法律人才庫(kù)專家 翟國(guó)強(qiáng);立法法修改應(yīng)明確界定地方立法權(quán)限[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

6 本報(bào)記者 鄧新建;“我們考慮了地方立法權(quán)限”[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

7 國(guó)務(wù)院法制辦 青鋒 袁雪石;巴西立法何特色[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

8 北京市律師協(xié)會(huì)行政法專業(yè)委員會(huì) 呂立秋;依法行政需要解決的基本問題[N];中國(guó)醫(yī)藥報(bào);2004年

9 記者 楊津玉;省調(diào)研組來饒調(diào)研法治建設(shè)[N];上饒日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

10 本報(bào)記者 謝光飛;盡快修訂《大氣污染防治法》[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王東勇;論我國(guó)稅收立法權(quán)限體制的完善[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

2 王思遠(yuǎn);地方立法權(quán)限研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2015年

3 朱強(qiáng)和;設(shè)區(qū)的市地方立法權(quán)限的明細(xì)化[D];蘇州大學(xué);2016年

4 岳秀琦;論我國(guó)地方立法權(quán)限的范圍[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

5 肖小平;關(guān)于我國(guó)立法權(quán)限劃分問題研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2004年

6 易君;論我國(guó)地方人大與常委會(huì)立法權(quán)限劃分[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

7 鄭娟;我國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期府際關(guān)系框架下的中央與地方立法權(quán)限研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2008年

8 周英;我國(guó)地方立法權(quán)限研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

9 沈斌斌;憲政視野下的立法權(quán)限劃分研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2013年

10 吳濤;論地方先行立法[D];重慶大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2141472