論死刑司法控制的體系化展開——基于適用標準的解釋路徑
發(fā)布時間：2019-08-13 17:52
【摘要】：中國現(xiàn)行刑法中的死刑并不是完全意義上的"剝奪生命",而是一個概念集合,需要在不同條文規(guī)范中具體理解。在該種"死刑"規(guī)范體系中,中國死刑的適用應(yīng)當遵循相應(yīng)的進出分流機制,從而體系性地控制死刑的司法適用,實現(xiàn)罪刑均衡。基于嚴格限制死刑適用的目標共識,《刑法》第48條第1款中的"罪行極其嚴重"與"必須立即執(zhí)行"應(yīng)當分別是限制廣義死刑與死刑立即執(zhí)行的規(guī)范依據(jù)。"罪行極其嚴重"的解釋,應(yīng)當強調(diào)"罪行"是分則條款中的罪狀表述、不包含人身危險性因素,且"極其嚴重"必須明確可辨;"必須立即執(zhí)行"的解釋,則應(yīng)圍繞人身危險性因素展開,主要通過罪前與罪后情節(jié)評估行為人的再犯可能性。
[Abstract]:The death penalty in the current criminal law of China is not a complete sense of "deprivation of life", but a collection of concepts, which needs to be understood concretely in different provisions and norms. In this kind of "death penalty" standard system, the application of death penalty in China should follow the corresponding mechanism of diversion in and out, so as to systematically control the judicial application of death penalty and realize the balance between crime and punishment. Based on the consensus on the objective of strictly restricting the application of the death penalty, the words "extremely serious crimes" and "must be carried out immediately" in article 48, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Code should be the normative basis for restricting the death penalty in a broad sense and the immediate execution of the death penalty, respectively. " In the interpretation of "crime is extremely serious", it should be emphasized that "crime" is the expression of guilt in the sub-clause, which does not contain personal dangerousness factors, and "extremely serious" must be clearly distinguished; the interpretation of "must be carried out immediately" should be carried out around the personal dangerousness factor, mainly through the circumstances before and after the crime to assess the possibility of recidivism of the perpetrator.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金一般項目(15BFX085)
【分類號】：D924.1
本文編號：2526265
[Abstract]:The death penalty in the current criminal law of China is not a complete sense of "deprivation of life", but a collection of concepts, which needs to be understood concretely in different provisions and norms. In this kind of "death penalty" standard system, the application of death penalty in China should follow the corresponding mechanism of diversion in and out, so as to systematically control the judicial application of death penalty and realize the balance between crime and punishment. Based on the consensus on the objective of strictly restricting the application of the death penalty, the words "extremely serious crimes" and "must be carried out immediately" in article 48, paragraph 1, of the Criminal Code should be the normative basis for restricting the death penalty in a broad sense and the immediate execution of the death penalty, respectively. " In the interpretation of "crime is extremely serious", it should be emphasized that "crime" is the expression of guilt in the sub-clause, which does not contain personal dangerousness factors, and "extremely serious" must be clearly distinguished; the interpretation of "must be carried out immediately" should be carried out around the personal dangerousness factor, mainly through the circumstances before and after the crime to assess the possibility of recidivism of the perpetrator.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金一般項目(15BFX085)
【分類號】：D924.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳增寶;死刑司法控制的觀念與實踐[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2004年06期
2 吳大華;論少數(shù)民族犯罪的司法控制[J];云南大學學報(法學版);2005年01期
3 楊誠;;死刑司法控制的美國模式之研究與借鑒[J];刑法論叢;2010年02期
4 陳坦松;罪刑法定的代價及其司法控制[J];華東政法學院學報;2002年06期
5 楊誠;;死刑司法控制的美國模式之研究與借鑒[J];政治與法律;2008年11期
6 梁麗佳;;中國死刑司法控制之思考[J];青年與社會;2013年06期
7 儲槐植;;死刑司法控制:完整解讀刑法第四十八條[J];中外法學;2012年05期
8 聶立澤;;我國搶劫罪死刑司法控制研究[J];政治與法律;2008年11期
9 張磊;余金;;受虐人群殺人案件的死刑司法控制研究[J];法學雜志;2010年03期
10 楊俊;;死刑司法控制的程序性路徑分析——以死刑復核權(quán)之回歸為視角[J];江西公安�？茖W校學報;2007年04期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 韋麗;中國死刑司法控制研究[D];中國政法大學;2009年
，本文編號：2526265
本文鏈接：http://lk138.cn/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2526265.html
