【摘要】：利用影響力受賄罪證明的困難限制了其實(shí)踐操作性,引入刑事推定有利于破解證明困難造成的訴訟僵局。作為證據(jù)證明的補(bǔ)充手段,刑事推定在司法證明中具有可用性。但基于推定的或然性本質(zhì),應(yīng)對(duì)事實(shí)推定的運(yùn)用和法律推定的創(chuàng)制進(jìn)行嚴(yán)格規(guī)制。推定處于實(shí)體和程序的交界處,證明困難的根本解決,有賴于借助推定這一視角反思和改進(jìn)我國(guó)的刑事立法,拉近實(shí)體與程序的距離。
[Abstract]:The difficulty of proving the crime of accepting bribes with influence limits its practical operation, and the introduction of criminal inference is helpful to solve the deadlock caused by the difficulty of proof. As a supplementary means of proof of evidence, criminal inference is available in judicial proof. However, based on the probabilistic nature of presumptions, the application of factual presumptions and the creation of legal presumptions should be strictly regulated. Presumptions are at the junction of entity and procedure, and the fundamental solution of proving difficulties depends on reflecting and improving the criminal legislation of our country and narrowing the distance between entity and procedure from the perspective of presumptions.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究一般項(xiàng)目“共犯體系與共犯立法研究”(14YJC820078)
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3;D924.1
，

本文編號(hào)：2504652