本文選題：兇器 + 攜帶　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：“攜帶兇器盜竊”是《刑法修正案（八）》新增的盜竊類型，立法規(guī)定和司法解釋對此行為無太多詳盡說明，因此引發(fā)學(xué)界和實務(wù)界的熱議�！皵y帶兇器盜竊”在現(xiàn)實生活中時有發(fā)生，《刑法修正案（八）》出臺之前“攜帶兇器盜竊”若未達到數(shù)額較大不會對其定罪處罰，由于其行為既侵犯財產(chǎn)權(quán)又對人身安全造成威脅，《刑法修正案（八）》突破以往只將盜竊數(shù)額較大作為定罪處罰的模式，直接將“攜帶兇器盜竊”與“入戶盜竊”、“扒竊”單獨入罪。由于刑法規(guī)定的特殊性，對“攜帶兇器盜竊”的行為需要做出科學(xué)合理的解釋，以便法律的公正施行。所謂“兇器”是指行為人為準備盜竊所攜帶在身上的，具有一定殺傷力，能夠使人產(chǎn)生威脅感的物品�！皟雌鳌笨梢苑譃樽匀晃锲泛腿斯の锲�。自然物品要成為“兇器”的范疇必須是滿足一定的人工性和制造性的無生物，而不拘泥于物品存在的形態(tài)。人工物品無論其以何種形式存在，都應(yīng)遵循一般判斷標準。所謂“攜帶”是指在實施盜竊的過程中將“兇器”置于行為人現(xiàn)實的支配之下，能夠有效使用的行為。其含義可分別從主體、主觀與客觀方面進行探討。從主體上認定“攜帶”，認為僅僅出現(xiàn)了某一行為人攜帶了兇器進行盜竊，其他共同實行行為人沒有攜帶兇器也對攜帶者的行為完全不知曉時，不應(yīng)認為成立“攜帶兇器盜竊”。主觀上認定“攜帶”，指行為人攜帶兇器是自己所意愿所計劃的事情，行為人能夠正確無誤地認識到自己身上所攜帶的兇器。且行為人攜帶兇器的目的是希望所攜帶的兇器能夠達到排除、阻止他人的反抗，從而確保盜竊的順利進行，以便達到非法占有財物的目的。客觀方面，從時間上認定“攜帶”，單純處于預(yù)備階段而在實行之前就放棄了“兇器”的不宜認定為“攜帶兇器盜竊”，但如果處于預(yù)備階段而在實行過程中放棄“攜帶”的，依然構(gòu)成“攜帶兇器盜竊”。從空間上認定“攜帶”，只要在盜竊的過程中有“攜帶”行為即可，，是從外界帶入現(xiàn)場還是就地獲得的在所不論。從方式上認定“攜帶”主要包括無意顯露型和暗藏兇器型的“攜帶”。所謂“攜帶兇器盜竊”是指以非法占有為目的，而攜帶具有一定殺傷力，能讓社會一般人產(chǎn)生威脅感的器具以輔助完成盜竊的行為。并非所有“攜帶兇器盜竊”的行為都一律入罪，攜帶兇器未盜取任何財物或所竊數(shù)額微小，且無其他嚴重情節(jié)的，不認為是犯罪�！皵y帶兇器盜竊”與“攜帶兇器搶奪”對法益侵害程度不同，“攜帶兇器搶奪”中的搶奪行為是行為人當(dāng)場直接奪取他人緊密占有的財物行為。而“攜帶兇器盜竊”中的盜竊行為是平和取財?shù)男袨椤?br/>[Abstract]:"burglary with murder weapon" is a new type of theft in Criminal Law Amendment (8), which has not been explained in detail by legislation and judicial interpretation, so it has aroused heated discussion in academic and practical circles. Theft with a murder weapon occurs from time to time in real life. Before the introduction of the Amendment (VIII) to the Criminal Law, if the amount of theft with the murder weapon was not reached, it would not be convicted and punished. As its behavior not only infringes property rights but also poses a threat to personal safety, the Criminal Law Amendment (8) breaks through the previous pattern of only taking a larger amount of theft as a conviction and punishment, and directly commits "burglary with murder weapons" and "burglary into the house". Pickpocketing is a separate offence. Due to the particularity of the criminal law, it is necessary to make a scientific and reasonable explanation for the act of "armed theft with murder weapon" in order to carry out the law fairly. The so-called "murder weapon" refers to the goods that the perpetrator carries on his body in preparation for theft, which has a certain killing power and can make people feel threatened. The weapon can be divided into natural objects and artificial objects. If natural objects are to be "weapons of murder", they must satisfy certain artificial and manufacturing nature, and should not be confined to the form of existence of objects. Artificial objects, no matter what form they exist, should follow the general judgment standard. The so-called "carrying" refers to the behavior in which the "murder weapon" is placed under the actual control of the perpetrator and can be effectively used in the process of theft. Its meaning can be discussed from subjective, subjective and objective aspects. When the subject determines that "carrying", only one actor carries the weapon for theft, and the other joint perpetrators do not carry the weapon, they do not know the behavior of the carrier at all. It should not be considered as "armed theft". Subjective determination of "carrying" means that the perpetrator carries a weapon which is planned by his will, and the perpetrator can correctly recognize the weapon he carries on his body. And the purpose of the perpetrator carrying the weapon is to hope that the weapon carried with him can be excluded, prevent the resistance of others, thus ensure the smooth progress of theft, in order to achieve the purpose of illegal possession of property. Objectively speaking, when "carrying" is determined in time, those who are simply in the preparatory stage and give up "murder weapon" before implementation should not be regarded as "carrying the murder weapon theft", but if they are in the preparatory stage and give up "carrying" in the process of implementation, It still constitutes "burglary with the murder weapon". As long as there is "carrying" behavior in the process of theft, whether it is brought into the scene or obtained locally from outside. The mode of "carrying" mainly includes unintentional exposure and concealed murder weapon. The so-called "carrying murder weapon theft" refers to the act of accomplishing theft with the purpose of illegal possession, and carrying with it a certain degree of killing power, which can make the general public have a sense of threat. Not all acts of "armed theft" are criminalized. It is not considered a crime to carry a weapon without stealing any property or a small amount of money stolen and without any other serious circumstances. There is a difference between "armed theft" and "robbery with murder weapon" to the degree of infringement on legal interests. The act of robbery in "robbery with murder weapon" is the act of directly seizing the property in close possession of the other person on the spot. And the theft in "theft with murder weapon" is the behavior of taking money peacefully.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.35

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周嘯天;;攜帶兇器盜竊的刑法解析——對《刑法修正案(八)》的解讀[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2011年04期

2 張明楷;簡論“攜帶兇器搶奪”[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2000年04期

3 楊子良;盜竊罪若干新型問題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年01期

4 張明楷;;盜竊與搶奪的界限[J];法學(xué)家;2006年02期

5 李云林;;簡論攜帶兇器盜竊[J];法制與社會;2012年19期

6 魏東;;《刑法修正案(八)》若干新規(guī)的詮釋與適用[J];法治研究;2011年05期

7 李振林;;嚴懲盜竊也應(yīng)有度——對《刑法修正案(八)》第39條規(guī)定之反思[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年02期

8 陳志軍;;“攜帶兇器盜竊”的司法認定[J];法學(xué);2013年08期

9 閆瑞;;論“攜帶兇器盜竊”[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年01期

10 毛英歌;顧海寧;;預(yù)謀搶劫與攜帶兇器盜竊辨析——馮某搶劫案[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年10期

本文編號：2039822