本文選題：有償刪帖犯罪 + 法律適用��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技的高度發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡(luò)與我們的生活更是息息相關(guān)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)的迅猛發(fā)展在給我們生活帶來(lái)諸多便利的同時(shí),也給我們法制建設(shè)帶來(lái)許多挑戰(zhàn),本文所述的網(wǎng)絡(luò)有償刪帖犯罪行為便是在此背景之下衍生出來(lái)的新型犯罪。由于信息傳播的速度之快難以想象,人們總是可以在足不出戶的情況下獲知新信息,大到企業(yè)、國(guó)家小到個(gè)人,正面信息的傳播對(duì)于其自身發(fā)展都至關(guān)重要,一旦出現(xiàn)關(guān)乎自身名譽(yù)影響自身發(fā)展的負(fù)面消息,均想在第一時(shí)間去除,防止消息過(guò)度傳播,而經(jīng)過(guò)正規(guī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)刪除程序處理又具有一定的滯后性,難以迅速有效處理事態(tài)擴(kuò)大化,在這樣的環(huán)境下衍生了提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)有償刪帖服務(wù)。由于從事提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)有償刪帖服務(wù)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)公關(guān)公司往往通過(guò)此種方式獲取暴利,不僅妨礙正常的網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)營(yíng)秩序,破壞市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)自身運(yùn)行,而且在一定程度上侵犯的公民的言論自由與獲取真實(shí)信息的權(quán)利,所以刑法應(yīng)對(duì)性質(zhì)惡劣的此種行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制。所以本文針對(duì)此種行為在刑法的視角下對(duì)其進(jìn)行深度挖掘,針對(duì)在司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)此類行為在法律適用中存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行剖析。本文的結(jié)構(gòu)如下:第一部分介紹該論題的研究意義與現(xiàn)實(shí)價(jià)值,對(duì)于提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)有償刪帖行為的研究具有一定的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,對(duì)于維護(hù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)營(yíng)秩序的穩(wěn)定具有重要意義;第二部分為提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)有償刪帖行為的概述,簡(jiǎn)要介紹了提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)有償刪帖行為,其行為具有違法性、牟利性、職業(yè)化、方式多樣化,此行為受一定的利益鏈條牽引導(dǎo)致其一直在走法律的擦邊球,而對(duì)于規(guī)制此類行為的法律法規(guī)少之又少,對(duì)其進(jìn)行直接規(guī)定的為兩高聯(lián)合發(fā)布的司法解釋,所以對(duì)其的深入研究十分必要;第三部分由一則案例開始,引出司法實(shí)踐中法律適用的問(wèn)題,包括歸入非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪是否符合其入罪前提"違反國(guó)家規(guī)定",如何界定其屬于嚴(yán)重?fù)p害市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序的行為,對(duì)于涉案的非法經(jīng)營(yíng)數(shù)額如何計(jì)算以及對(duì)于該解釋適用的溯及力問(wèn)題;第四部分針對(duì)上述在司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)該行為適用法律存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)一步提出完善建議。首先是將違反"國(guó)家規(guī)定"進(jìn)一步明確,對(duì)嚴(yán)重?fù)p害市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)一步細(xì)化,區(qū)分涉案數(shù)額為非法經(jīng)營(yíng)數(shù)額還是違法所得數(shù)額,并分別確定其所達(dá)到的構(gòu)罪數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與二者競(jìng)合情況下的構(gòu)罪數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn),最后建議在司法解釋后添加關(guān)于該解釋適用溯及力問(wèn)題的條文以便維護(hù)解釋適用的公平性。由于學(xué)界上對(duì)于提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)有償刪帖犯罪行為的法律適用問(wèn)題的研究甚少,本文僅為筆者拙見,希望能夠?qū)λ痉▽?shí)踐中審判該類案件帶來(lái)些許幫助。
[Abstract]:With the development of network technology, the network is closely related to our life. The rapid development of the network not only brings us many conveniences in life, but also brings many challenges to our legal system construction. The crime of network paid deletion is a new type of crime derived from this background. Because the speed at which information is spreading is unimaginable, people can always be informed of new information without leaving their homes, from large enterprises to small countries to individuals, and the dissemination of positive information is vital to their own development. Once there are negative news about their reputation affecting their own development, they all want to remove the news in the first time to prevent the excessive spread of the message, and after the formal network deletion program processing has a certain lag. Difficult to deal with the situation quickly and effectively, in such an environment derived from the provision of network paid delete services. Because the network public relations company which is engaged in providing the network paid delete post service often obtains the windfall profit through this way, not only hinders the normal network market management order, destroys the market economy itself operation, To some extent, it infringes on citizens' freedom of speech and the right to obtain true information, so the criminal law should regulate this kind of behavior which is abominable in nature. So this article aims at this kind of behavior under the angle of view of the criminal law carries on the deep excavation to it, carries on the analysis to this kind of behavior in the legal application question in the judicial practice. The structure of this paper is as follows: the first part introduces the research significance and practical value of the thesis, which has certain practical significance for providing the research of the network paid delete behavior, and has important significance for maintaining the stability of the network market management order; The second part is an overview of the behavior of providing network paid posts deletion, which is characterized by illegality, profit-making, professionalization and diversification. This behavior is led by a certain chain of interests leading to it has been following the law of the ball, but for the regulation of such acts of laws and regulations are very few, for the direct regulation of the two high joint issue of judicial interpretation, The third part begins with a case, which leads to the application of the law in judicial practice. Including whether the classification of the crime of illegal operation conforms to its premise of "violating the provisions of the State" and how to define it as an act that seriously damages the order of the market economy, For the amount of illegal business involved in how to calculate and the retroactive effect of the interpretation; the fourth part of the above in judicial practice in the application of the law to further improve the recommendations. The first is to further clarify the violation of the "State regulations," further refine the criteria that seriously impair the order of the market economy, and distinguish the amount involved in the case between the amount of illegal business and the amount of illegal income. Finally, the author proposes to add provisions on the retroactivity of the interpretation after judicial interpretation in order to maintain the fairness of the application of the interpretation. Due to the lack of academic research on the legal application of the crime of providing network compensation for deleting posts, this paper is only for the author's humble view, hoping to bring some help to the judicial practice in the trial of this kind of cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅小兵;試論非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年S1期

2 彭輔順;陳鵬展;;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪研究述評(píng)[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

3 杜磊;;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪若干問(wèn)題探析[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2005年39期

4 曹堅(jiān);非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪與銷售侵權(quán)復(fù)制品罪之界定[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

5 黨東升;;論非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪應(yīng)予廢除[J];新學(xué)術(shù)論文選;2006年01期

6 陳惜珍;;論非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪存在的合理性[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年05期

7 章建軍;;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪與“假煙”犯罪的比較[J];人民檢察;2009年07期

8 張華;;論非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪堵截條款的合理界定[J];學(xué)理論;2009年07期

9 王建;;論市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的價(jià)值取向[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年33期

10 賈成寬;;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪堵漏條款的限制——如何限定非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的無(wú)限擴(kuò)張趨勢(shì)[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 李欣;;警鹽聯(lián)手追逃 陳培軍終伏法[A];2004鄂鹽研究學(xué)術(shù)交流研討會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 湖南省檢察院 印仕柏邋肖功員 李春陽(yáng);非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪兩種情形的認(rèn)定[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

2 河南省焦作市解放區(qū)人民法院 趙高潮　張春峰;銷售少量并儲(chǔ)存大量盜版教材是否構(gòu)成非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

3 孟昭暉;淺析銷售侵權(quán)復(fù)制品罪與非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的分歧[N];天津政法報(bào);2009年

4 上海市第一中級(jí)人民法院 游偉;銷售侵權(quán)復(fù)制品罪與非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪關(guān)系探討[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

5 案例編寫人 重慶市第五中級(jí)人民法院 代貞奎;無(wú)證銷售非法音像制品可構(gòu)成非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年

6 侯國(guó)云;解析非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪中的“其他”[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

7 中國(guó)刑事警察學(xué)院 馬寧;完善非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪量刑規(guī)則的具體構(gòu)想[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

8 記者 趙興武　通訊員 鄧光揚(yáng);南京一對(duì)夫婦被以犯非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪判刑[N];人民法院報(bào);2011年

9 淮安市淮安區(qū)檢察院 王虹玫 蔣虎;私自煉制柴油是否構(gòu)成非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2012年

10 上海市第二中級(jí)人民法院 費(fèi)曄 潘庸魯;非法發(fā)放貸款不宜以非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪論處[N];人民法院報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 范德安;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

2 楊慶堂;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪立法及司法適用研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 于學(xué)東;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪補(bǔ)漏條款研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

2 陸光怡;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪之立法完善[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

3 雷宗儒;論非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的認(rèn)定[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

4 劉建;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪定性爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

5 萬(wàn)有志;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

6 李鳳蓮;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的擴(kuò)大化問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

7 張春雷;論非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

8 宋峗;論非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的犯罪構(gòu)成與適用[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

9 謝冬春;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪堵截條款研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2008年

10 徐蓉;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪構(gòu)成理論和司法實(shí)踐探析[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2038318