本文選題：玩忽職守罪 + 瀆職犯罪��； 參考：《大連海事大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：玩忽職守罪作為瀆職犯罪的一種,對社會造成了極大的危害,玩忽職守行為不僅對國家、公共財產(chǎn)和人民利益造成重大損失,而且嚴重玷污了公權(quán)力在人民心中的形象,造成了極為惡劣的社會影響。近年來因政府監(jiān)督管理不到位造成的公共安全損害案件屢屢發(fā)生,這里涉及到玩忽職守罪,本文以此為研究重點,希望在立法和司法上有所突破。 第一部分概述玩忽職守罪,介紹了我國對該罪的立法沿革,并且分別從客體、客觀方面、主體、主觀方面闡述了玩忽職守罪的四大構(gòu)成要件。 第二部分闡述了該罪的刑法理論難點問題。例如學者對于客體的界定分為兩大學說,簡單客體說和復(fù)雜客體說,筆者支持復(fù)雜客體說并且在文章中闡述了充分的理由；其次從玩忽職守罪的行為表現(xiàn)形式、玩忽職守罪的危害后果、玩忽職守行為與重大損失之間的因果聯(lián)系三方面介紹了玩忽職守罪的客觀方面并且介紹了相關(guān)學說,比如對于行為表現(xiàn)形式中的動與靜是不是區(qū)分作為與不作為的關(guān)鍵,玩忽職守行為所造成的損失的時間點應(yīng)該如何計算的問題,以及因果關(guān)系的界定,筆者都進行了詳細闡述。第三介紹了關(guān)于主體的主流學說身份說和公務(wù)說；第四描述了玩忽職守罪的主觀罪過形式,筆者認為玩忽職守罪的主觀罪過形式只能是過失而不能兼具過失和故意,并且闡述了理論依據(jù)。 第三部分介紹了玩忽職守罪與官僚主義、工作失誤、一般玩忽職守行為的界限,主要從主體和客體方面進行區(qū)分。 第四部分介紹該罪與其他安全事故類犯罪和濫用職權(quán)罪的區(qū)別。 第五部分從條文、該罪主體和刑罰種類的增設(shè)等三方面提出了對于玩忽職守罪完善的建議,例如對條文的規(guī)定要體現(xiàn)出對人民權(quán)利的保護,玩忽職守罪的犯罪客體是國家機關(guān)內(nèi)部管理制度和公共財產(chǎn)、國家和人民利益,而后者應(yīng)該是多種利益,包括人身權(quán)利、民主權(quán)利、財產(chǎn)權(quán)利等,但是“重大損失”難以囊括這些權(quán)利,只處罰造成“重大損失”的玩忽職守行為不能體現(xiàn)刑法對權(quán)利的完整的保護；同時擴大本罪的主體,不能只局限于國家機關(guān)工作人員這一類人,應(yīng)該將身份為非國家機關(guān)工作人員但卻從事著國家機關(guān)工作人員的人也納入該罪的主體內(nèi)；增加財產(chǎn)刑和資格刑。
[Abstract]:The crime of neglect of duty as a kind of duty crime has caused great harm to society , and neglect of duty not only caused great loss to the national , public property and people ' s interests , but also seriously polluted the image of the public power in the people ' s mind , and caused a very bad social impact . In recent years , the public security damage cases caused by the government ' s supervision and administration have repeatedly taken place . In recent years , because of the neglect of duty , this article focuses on the research focus and hopes to make a breakthrough in legislation and justice .

The first part summarizes the crime of neglect of duty , introduces our country ' s legislation evolution of the crime , and expounds four major elements of neglect duty crime from object , objective aspect , subject and subjective aspect respectively .

The second part expounds the difficulties of the criminal law theory of the crime . For example , the definition of the object is divided into two universities : the simple object theory and the complex object , the author supports the complex object and explains the sufficient reason in the article ;
Secondly , the author introduces the objective aspect of the crime of neglect of duty , and introduces the relevant theories , such as the question of how to calculate the relation between action and static in the form of behavior , the problem of how to calculate the time point of loss caused by neglect of duty behavior , and the definition of causality .
The fourth part describes the subjective crime of neglect of duty crime , and the author thinks that the form of subjective crime of neglecting duty crime can only be negligence and cannot have both negligence and intention , and expounds the theoretical basis .

The third part introduces the distinction between negligence crime and bureaucracy , working error and general negligence behavior , which is mainly distinguished from subject and object .

The fourth part introduces the distinction between the crime and other crimes of safety accidents and the crime of abuse of power .

In the fifth part , the author puts forward some suggestions on improving the crime of neglect of duty , such as the protection of the rights of the people , the object of the crime of neglect of duty is the internal management system of the State organ and the interests of the public property , the State and the people , but the latter should be a plurality of interests , including personal rights , democratic rights , property rights and so on , but the latter should be all kinds of interests , including personal rights , democratic rights , property rights , etc .
At the same time , the main body of the crime can not be limited to those of State organs and staff , but persons who are non - State organs should be included in the main body of the crime ;
Increase property penalties and qualifications .
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.393

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周吟吟;;玩忽職守罪主體問題探析[J];長江論壇;2009年02期

2 蔣蘭香;濫用職權(quán)罪與玩忽職守罪應(yīng)分條立法[J];法學;2005年07期

3 梁生東;;濫用職權(quán)罪與玩忽職守罪的辨析和完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2010年03期

4 易鄉(xiāng);;淺談刑法因果關(guān)系對刑事責任的影響[J];法制與社會;2010年36期

5 慈健;;濫用職權(quán)罪疑難問題研究[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學院學報;2011年03期

6 苗佳;;濫用職權(quán)罪若干問題芻議[J];法制與社會;2013年02期

7 路開華;;濫用職權(quán)罪與玩忽職守罪的損失認定[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2010年11期

8 陳從毅;;涉林瀆職犯罪“情節(jié)特別嚴重”標準探究——從經(jīng)濟損失的角度入手[J];貴陽市委黨校學報;2014年01期

9 董迎濤;玩忽職守罪客觀構(gòu)成要件探析[J];河南社會科學;2000年06期

10 薛紅,余軍生;濫用職權(quán)罪在司法實踐中的現(xiàn)狀及立法探討[J];河南社會科學;2002年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 黑龍江省紀委案件審理室 齊英武;[N];中國紀檢監(jiān)察報;2014年

2 龔懷軍 王加庚;[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2014年

，

本文編號：2038029