發(fā)布時間：2018-06-18 00:03

  本文選題：盜竊行為 + 轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫罪�。� 參考：《沈陽師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑法關(guān)于轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫罪中規(guī)定了三種先行行為，而這三種行為中以盜竊行為最為常見，轉(zhuǎn)化成搶劫的情況也更頻發(fā)，盜竊轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫的具體情況也相較其他兩種行為的情況更為復雜，尤其是刑法修正案八出臺后，盜竊行為的規(guī)定的修改，使盜竊轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫在理論和實踐上都出現(xiàn)了新的課題，故而對盜竊轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫認定的深入研究是極其必要的。 本文以盜竊轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫中的四個要件進行分析，分別為前提條件、主觀條件、客觀條件以及主體條件。在前提條件中筆者贊同罪行說的觀點，其主要依據(jù)就是這種觀點在對應(yīng)立法原意的同時，也符合罪刑法定的原則，即使屬于擴大解釋，也是合理的。而對于具體盜竊行為轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫罪中的加重情節(jié)，筆者認為是可以轉(zhuǎn)化的，但要符合主客觀相一致以及同等社會危害性的要求。而盜竊特殊財物的轉(zhuǎn)化中，只要符合侵犯相同的法益、不發(fā)生法條競合以及法定刑較輕的情況，也是可以轉(zhuǎn)化的。在主觀條件中，“為……毀滅罪證”是構(gòu)成盜竊轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫的主觀目的，，要構(gòu)成盜竊轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫必須要符合此主觀目的。在分析主觀目的時，筆者對主觀目的中的三項內(nèi)容分別作了分析和界定；在暴力威脅的分析中，暴力程度要達到一般人觀念中足以抑制反抗的作用，行為對象中包括盜竊行為的對象以及其他妨礙行為人主觀目的的人；在“當場”的分析中，“當場”所限定的現(xiàn)場是指盜竊的現(xiàn)場，在現(xiàn)場的延伸中要做到時間與空間相統(tǒng)一；在主體責任年齡的認定中，通過對肯定論和否定論的對比分析，筆者認為14-16周歲人是符合轉(zhuǎn)化主體的要求的；而在盜竊轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫中共同犯罪的問題上，要成立共同犯罪，要符合知情和支持兩個條件。
[Abstract]:The criminal law stipulates three kinds of action in the crime of transformation robbery, and the most common of the three kinds of behavior is theft, and the situation of transformation into robbery is more frequent. The specific situation of the transformation of theft to robbery is more complex than the other two kinds of behavior, especially after the revision of the criminal law amendment eight, the revision of the provisions of the theft In order to turn theft into robbery, a new topic has emerged in theory and practice. Therefore, it is extremely necessary to conduct in-depth research on the identification of theft into robbery.
This paper analyzes the four elements of theft transformation into robbery, which are preconditions, subjective conditions, objective conditions and subject conditions. In the precondition, the author agrees with the theory of crime, which is based on the principle that this view corresponds to the original meaning of the legislation, and it also conforms to the principle of a legally prescribed crime, even if it belongs to an expanded interpretation. It is reasonable, and the transformation of specific theft to the aggravation of the crime of robbery, I think it can be transformed, but it should be consistent with the subjective and objective view and the same social harmfulness. And in the transformation of theft of special property, as long as it is in conformity with the same legal interest, no law competition and legal punishment are lighter, In subjective conditions, "for. Destruction of a crime" is the subjective purpose of the transformation of theft to robbery, and the transformation of theft to robbery must conform to this subjective purpose. In the analysis of subjective purposes, the author makes an analysis and definition of three contents of the subjective purpose; in the analysis of the threat of violence, the course of violence is a course of violence. In the analysis of the "spot", the scene defined by "the spot" refers to the scene of the theft, and the time and space should be unified in the extension of the scene; in the subject responsibility. In the determination of the age, through the comparison of the affirmative theory and the negation theory, the author thinks that the 14-16 year old man is in conformity with the requirement of the subject of transformation, and on the issue of the common crime in the transformation of theft to robbery, the two conditions should be conformed to the common crime.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 秦少斌,鄧紹秋;轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫的實務(wù)研究[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W校學報;2003年02期

2 王永生;放寬對未成年人犯罪適用緩刑條件之淺析[J];山西高等學校社會科學學報;2000年10期

3 章惠萍;轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫罪成立的條件[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2004年01期

本文編號：2033052