發(fā)布時間：2018-06-16 21:17

  本文選題：非法占有目的 + 證據(jù)�。� 參考：《北京交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】："非法占有目的"是刑法中犯罪主觀構(gòu)成要件中的一個重要組成部分。由于行為人主觀目的的內(nèi)在性,不易為外人所知,司法實踐中經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)因無法證明行為人具有"非法占有目的"而發(fā)生無法歸罪的情形。目前"非法占有目的"證明存在的問題主要在于,在我國目前的刑事訴訟證明理論下,證明"非法占有目的"的實踐操作混亂和運用推定規(guī)則沒有相配套的制度等問題。因此,理論上對"非法占有目的"證明的基本學(xué)說進行梳理,無疑會更利于司法實踐操作,對于維護法律的尊嚴和統(tǒng)一而言,具有重大意義。但遺憾的是國內(nèi)大多數(shù)學(xué)者對"非法占有目的"問題的論述多是以某一具體罪名來論述,顯然這種方法不能有效解決有關(guān)"非法占有目的"證明的根本問題。筆者結(jié)合目前已有的理論學(xué)說和司法實踐,從以下四部分論述"非法占有目的"的證明:文章的第一部分主要是對"非法占有目的"所涉及的基礎(chǔ)理論問題進行必要的梳理和探討。首先,運用規(guī)范分析方法界定"非法占有目的"中"目的"和"占有"的刑法學(xué)含義。其次,總結(jié)出了目前我國證明"非法占有目的"的幾種方式,包括運用證據(jù)進行證明、運用推定進行認定等方式。文章的第二部分結(jié)合我國司法實踐中證明"非法占有目的"的現(xiàn)狀,并結(jié)合當(dāng)前我國涉及"非法占有目的"證明的相關(guān)法律法規(guī)及司法解釋的規(guī)定在實踐中應(yīng)用現(xiàn)狀,通過案例分析法,對于當(dāng)前我國司法實踐中認定"非法占有目的"的現(xiàn)狀和困難進行了細致的分析和思考,總結(jié)出了目前證明方式存在的問題局限性。文章的第三部分主要提出司法實踐中產(chǎn)生證明"非法占有目的"困境的原因,并分析了證明"非法占有目的"理論學(xué)說存在的問題,包括對刑事證明的理論研究比較缺乏,對于推定的基本問題缺乏通識,同時,我國司法實踐存在刑事訴訟證明理論難以解決"非法占有目的"證明困難、對于"非法占有目的"的證明證據(jù)來源較少、推定學(xué)說面臨理論障礙和應(yīng)用混亂等問題。文章的第四部分針對前文所提及的證明"非法占有目的"在我國目前理論和實踐中存在的問題,提出了筆者自己的一些想法。首先,在明確"非法占有目的"相關(guān)概念及推定的基本理論基礎(chǔ)上,修正我國目前的刑事證明理論;對目前證明"非法占有目的"的幾種方法進行分析,其中在實體法上可以考慮通過調(diào)整刑法罪名設(shè)置來變更證明對象,程序法上規(guī)范推定適用的規(guī)則和程序;并提出增加指導(dǎo)性案例來指導(dǎo)相關(guān)司法實踐,探索構(gòu)建我國"非法占有目的"的證明規(guī)則。
[Abstract]:The purpose of illegal possession is an important part of the subjective elements of crime in criminal law. Due to the intrinsic nature of the subjective purpose of the perpetrator, it is difficult for outsiders to know it. In judicial practice, there is often a situation in which the perpetrator is unable to be criminalized because he cannot prove that the perpetrator has the purpose of "illegal possession". At present, the problems existing in the proof of "the purpose of illegal possession" are mainly due to the confusion in the practice of proving the "purpose of illegal possession" under the present theory of proof of criminal procedure in our country and the lack of corresponding system in the application of the presumption rules. Therefore, theoretically combing the basic theory of "the purpose of illegal possession" will undoubtedly be more conducive to the operation of judicial practice, and it is of great significance to maintain the dignity and unity of the law. However, it is regrettable that most of the scholars in our country discuss the problem of "illegal possession purpose" mostly by a specific crime. Obviously, this method can not effectively solve the fundamental problem of the proof of "illegal possession purpose". The author combines the existing theory and judicial practice, This paper discusses the proof of "the purpose of illegal possession" from the following four parts: the first part of the article mainly discusses the basic theoretical problems involved in "the purpose of illegal possession". Firstly, the definition of "purpose" and "possession" in the purpose of illegal possession is defined by the method of normative analysis. Secondly, it summarizes several ways to prove the purpose of illegal possession in our country, including the use of evidence to prove, the use of presumption to identify, and so on. The second part of the article combines the present situation of proving "illegal possession purpose" in our country's judicial practice, and combines with the current situation of application of relevant laws and regulations and judicial interpretation provisions concerning "illegal possession purpose" proof in our country. Through the case analysis, this paper makes a detailed analysis and reflection on the present situation and difficulties of determining the purpose of illegal possession in the judicial practice of our country, and summarizes the problems and limitations of the current mode of proof. The third part of the article mainly puts forward the reasons of the dilemma of proving "the purpose of illegal possession" in judicial practice, and analyzes the problems existing in the theory of proving "the purpose of illegal possession", including the lack of theoretical research on criminal proof. There is a lack of general knowledge about the basic problems of presumption. At the same time, the theory of proof of criminal procedure in our judicial practice is difficult to solve the difficulty of proving "purpose of illegal possession", and the source of proof of "purpose of illegal possession" is less. The theory of presumption is confronted with theoretical obstacles and confusion in application. In the fourth part of this paper, the author puts forward some ideas in view of the problems existing in the theory and practice of proving the purpose of illegal possession mentioned above. First of all, on the basis of defining the related concepts of "the purpose of illegal possession" and the basic theory of presumption, we revise the present criminal proof theory of our country, and analyze several methods of proving "the purpose of illegal possession" at present. In the substantive law, we may consider changing the object of proof by adjusting the setting of criminal law charges, standardizing the rules and procedures applicable to the presumption in procedural law, and proposing adding instructive cases to guide the relevant judicial practice. To explore the construction of our country's "illegal possession of the purpose" of the rules of proof.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉進;刑法“非法占有目的”論[J];桂林師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(綜合版);2002年01期

2 陳增寶;對“非法占有目的的產(chǎn)生時間”的初步探索[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年05期

3 陳增寶;;“非法占有目的的產(chǎn)生時間”之研究[J];中國刑事法雜志;2004年02期

4 吳貴森;;非法占有目的內(nèi)涵之辨析[J];集美大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年02期

5 蔡晚拴;;試對搶劫罪中“非法占有”問題的理解和認定[J];科技信息(學(xué)術(shù)研究);2008年16期

6 高樺;;詐騙類犯罪非法占有目的的實務(wù)認定[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2008年10期

7 金劍;;如何認定刑法上非法占有的故意[J];法制與社會;2012年12期

8 練小勃;我國刑法中非法占有目的之反思[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年04期

9 羅勇;秦揚;;“以非法占有為目的”論析[J];四川省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

10 陳增寶;淺論刑法中“非法占有目的的產(chǎn)生時間”[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2003年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 鐘云勇;論非法占有目的及其證明[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

2 劉麗梅;論刑法上的非法占有目的[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

3 雷秀華;非法占有目的研究[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

4 鐘鳴;論我國刑法中的“非法占有目的”[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2011年

5 王凱;刑法中的“非法占有為目的”若干問題探究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

6 戴軍;論刑法中“非法占有目的”的認定及立法完善[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

7 馮舉;盜用財物若干問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2015年

8 王慶;論集資詐騙罪“非法占有目的”的司法認定[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

9 白鴿;集資詐騙罪中非法占有目的的認定[D];山西大學(xué);2015年

10 張光愛;論合同詐騙罪非法占有目的之認定[D];西南科技大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：2028137