本文選題：貸款詐騙 + 非法占有為目的��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)蓬勃發(fā)展的今天,金融業(yè)在社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展中起到了重要的作用。而在銀行金融業(yè)務(wù)中,信貸又是支持在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)洪流中激昂前行的各類市場主體的一個(gè)有效助力。通過信貸業(yè)務(wù),各類市場主體可以不受現(xiàn)有資金的約束,克服資金困難,擴(kuò)大經(jīng)營規(guī)模。但是,在銀行信貸業(yè)發(fā)展的同時(shí),一些針對信貸業(yè)的金融犯罪也隨之出現(xiàn)。其中,貸款詐騙罪就是這些金融犯罪中比較多發(fā)的一種。信貸業(yè)中的貸款詐騙,使信貸業(yè)出現(xiàn)了一個(gè)惡性循環(huán)。不法借貸人,尤其是市場經(jīng)濟(jì)商業(yè)領(lǐng)域的諸多不法商人,企圖千方百計(jì)從金融機(jī)構(gòu)中非法獲取貸款,作為其創(chuàng)業(yè)的“第一桶金”或者解決其經(jīng)營中的資金問題。而金融機(jī)構(gòu)經(jīng)歷了數(shù)次貸款有去無回,造成諸多死賬壞賬、遭受巨大經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的情況下,也一再嚴(yán)格貸款條件。而對于貸款人嚴(yán)格的貸款條件無法滿足,他們轉(zhuǎn)而熱衷于通過非法手段獲取貸款,這便造成了一個(gè)借貸行業(yè)的惡性循環(huán)。為了保證金融信貸業(yè)和市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的正常發(fā)展,必須嚴(yán)厲打擊貸款詐騙罪。因此我們必須結(jié)合國外關(guān)于貸款詐騙犯罪的立法,不斷完善我國刑法關(guān)于貸款詐騙罪的規(guī)定,認(rèn)真分析貸款詐騙罪認(rèn)定中的一些疑難問題,正確認(rèn)定貸款詐騙罪。本文共分為四個(gè)部分,大約3萬字,主要內(nèi)容為： 第一部分：貸款詐騙罪基本概況。該部分總結(jié)了我國刑法設(shè)立貸款詐騙罪的經(jīng)過以及我國刑法中對貸款詐騙罪的規(guī)定。同時(shí)分析了國外行為犯立法模式與我國結(jié)果犯立法模式的利弊。最后對金融機(jī)構(gòu)貸款的程序規(guī)則進(jìn)行了介紹和分析。 第二部分：“以非法占有為目的”的認(rèn)定。該部分從實(shí)然和應(yīng)然的角度對非法占有為目的這一貸款詐騙罪的必要主觀要件的認(rèn)定進(jìn)行了分析。認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)按照主客觀相一致的原則對這一主觀要件進(jìn)行認(rèn)定,并提出認(rèn)定這一要件所要考察的具體方面。最后重點(diǎn)分析事后產(chǎn)生非法占有為目的的行為的認(rèn)定,認(rèn)為行為人貸款后才產(chǎn)生非法占有的目的,不應(yīng)定為貸款詐騙罪,這種情況只能根據(jù)數(shù)額和情節(jié)作為普通的貸款糾紛或者侵占罪論處。 第三部分：貸款詐騙的共同犯罪。該部分對貸款詐騙罪的共同犯罪分為外部人貸款詐騙的共同犯罪和內(nèi)外勾結(jié)的貸款詐騙罪的共同犯罪兩個(gè)部分進(jìn)行分析。外部人貸款詐騙的共同犯罪較容易認(rèn)定,只要根據(jù)共同犯罪理論基本就可確定。內(nèi)外勾結(jié)的貸款詐騙的共同犯罪的定性要具體分析內(nèi)部人在貸款中的作用,以及具體分析金融機(jī)構(gòu)是否被騙。據(jù)此確定這種情況下是定性為貸款詐騙罪的共同犯罪還是貪污罪或職務(wù)侵占罪的共同犯罪。 第四部分：貸款詐騙罪認(rèn)定中的界限。該部分從貸款詐騙罪與非罪的界限、此罪與彼罪的界限兩個(gè)部分進(jìn)行分析。在罪與非罪中具體解決了貸款詐騙罪與貸款糾紛的界限、有擔(dān)保的貸款詐騙的行為的認(rèn)定、貸款詐騙罪中數(shù)額的認(rèn)定三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行闡述。在此罪與彼罪的界限中解決了貸款詐騙罪與詐騙罪和合同詐騙罪的界限、貸款詐騙罪與冒名貸款行為的界限、貸款詐騙罪與貪污罪或職務(wù)侵占罪的界限等等。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the market economy, the financial industry plays an important role in the development of the socialist market economy. In the banking financial business, credit is also an effective support for all kinds of market entities that are driving forward in the flood of the market economy. Through the credit industry, various market bodies can not be funded by the existing funds. Constraints, to overcome financial difficulties, expand the scale of operation. However, in the development of the bank credit industry, some of the financial crimes against the credit industry also arise. Among them, the crime of loan fraud is one of the more frequently occurring in these financial crimes. There are many illegal businessmen in the market economy, trying to get loans illegally from financial institutions, as "the first bucket of gold" or to solve the financial problems in their business. The financial institutions have gone through several loans, which have caused many bad debts and suffered huge economic losses. In order to ensure the normal development of the credit industry and the market economy, the loan fraud must be severely punished. Therefore, we must combine the foreign countries with foreign countries in order to ensure the normal development of the financial credit industry and the market economy. On the legislation of loan fraud crime, we constantly improve the provisions of the crime of loan fraud in the criminal law of China, analyze some difficult problems in the identification of the crime of loan fraud and correctly identify the crime of loan fraud. This article is divided into four parts, about 3 thousand words, the main content is:
The first part is the basic situation of the crime of loan fraud. This part summarizes the passage of the crime of loan fraud in China's criminal law and the provisions on the crime of fraud in the criminal law in our country. At the same time, it analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the legislative mode of foreign act offenders and the legislative mode of the result offenders in our country. Analysis.
The second part: the identification of "the purpose of illegal possession". This part analyses the necessary subjective requisites of the crime of fraud for the purpose of illegal possession from the point of view of reality and deserved. At the end of this paper, we focus on the identification of the act of illegal possession for the purpose of causing the illegal possession after the loan, which should not be the crime of loan fraud. This situation can only be used as an ordinary loan dispute or the crime of encroachment according to the amount and plot.
The third part: the joint crime of loan fraud. This part analyzes the common crime of the crime of fraud of loan fraud into two parts: the joint crime of the external person loan fraud and the joint crime of the loan fraud of the inside and outside collusion. The common crime of the fraud of the external person loan is easier to be identified, as long as it is basically true according to the theory of common crime. The qualitative analysis of the role of the internal and external collusion in the joint crime of fraud is to analyze the role of the insider in the loan and the specific analysis of whether the financial institutions are deceived. In this case, it is determined that the joint crime of the crime of fraud of the loan or the common crime of the crime of embezzlement or duty embezzlement is determined in this case.
The fourth part: the boundary of the crime of loan fraud. This part analyses the boundary between the crime of fraud and the non crime, and the two parts of the boundary between the crime and the crime. In the crime and the non crime, the boundary of the loan fraud and the loan dispute is concretely solved, the affirmation of the secured loan fraud and the determination of the amount of the amount of the loan fraud is three. The boundary between the crime of loan fraud and the crime of fraud and contract fraud, the boundary of the crime of loan fraud and the impostor loan, the boundary of the crime of loan fraud and the crime of embezzlement or the crime of occupying duty, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉憲權(quán),吳允鋒;論金融詐騙罪的非法占有目的[J];法學(xué);2001年07期

2 吳學(xué)斌,俞娟;論我國刑法中的“以非法占有為目的”[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年02期

3 劉航,劉遠(yuǎn);論貸款詐騙罪的認(rèn)定[J];河北法學(xué);2002年05期

4 劉明祥;刑法中的非法占有目的[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年02期

5 線杰;貸款詐騙罪的立法完善[J];人民檢察;2001年04期

6 王晨;論詐騙犯罪中的非法占有目的[J];人民司法;2001年01期

7 鄧宇瓊;貸款詐騙罪認(rèn)定中的若干問題研究[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2004年02期

8 侯國云,陳麗華;金融詐騙罪認(rèn)定的幾個(gè)問題[J];中國刑事法雜志;2001年05期

9 徐新勵(lì),沈丙友;金融詐騙犯罪主觀目的訴訟證明困境與出路論[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年05期

10 趙秉志;論金融詐騙罪的概念和構(gòu)成特征[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 田毅春;論貸款詐騙罪[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2026721