發(fā)布時間：2018-06-15 20:01

  本文選題：事后搶劫 + 實行行為　； 參考：《南京師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：事后搶劫存在未遂形態(tài)。事后搶劫中的“犯盜竊、詐騙、搶奪罪”并不意味著行為人在事實上要構成盜竊罪、詐騙罪、搶奪罪,而是意味著行為人有犯盜竊、詐騙、搶奪的故意和行為；事后搶劫中暴力或暴力威脅的程度必須與搶劫罪中的暴力、脅迫處于同等的程度,即必須達到足以壓制被害人反抗的程度,并且這種暴力或暴力威脅的對象不必是盜竊、詐騙、搶奪的被害人,還可以是目擊犯罪行為而追蹤來的第三人；事后搶劫中的當場一是指實施盜竊、詐騙、搶奪行為的現(xiàn)場,二是指在盜竊等行為的現(xiàn)場或剛一離開該現(xiàn)場就被人及時發(fā)現(xiàn)而立即追捕過程中的場所,另外,暴力或暴力威脅行為必須是在“盜竊的機會還在繼續(xù)中”實施的。事后搶劫的實行行為是行為人為了窩藏贓物、抗拒抓捕或毀滅罪證而實施的暴力、暴力威脅行為。事后搶劫未遂的認定要分為兩種情形,當行為人在前行為中取得財物時,此時重點保護的法益是財產權益,應以是否取得財物為標準；當行為人在前行為中未取得財物時,此時重點保護的法益是人身權益,應以是否造成他人輕傷以上后果為標準。事后搶劫存在預備階段的中止但是卻不具有可罰性。事后搶劫中止的時間條件是行為人當場實施暴力或暴力威脅的過程之中；事后搶劫中止自動性條件是行為人的主觀內容是自愿放棄非法占有他人財物或者抗拒抓捕、毀滅罪證的意圖,并且在客觀上停止了暴力或暴力威脅行為,另外在判斷事后搶劫中止的自動性時,應以犯罪中止的法律性質為指導,同時采取逐步判斷的方法；事后搶劫中止的有效性條件是行為人自動放棄了暴力、暴力威脅行為,并且以后也不再繼續(xù)實施,當中止行為與犯罪結果沒有發(fā)生之間不存在因果關系以及行為人自動放棄了重復的侵害行為時,也成立中止犯。
[Abstract]:The crime of theft , fraud and robbery in post - robbery doesn ' t mean that the perpetrator is in fact guilty of theft , fraud and robbery , but it means that the perpetrator is guilty of theft , fraud and robbery ;
The degree of violence or threat of violence in post - robbery must be equal to the violence and coercion in the crime of robbery , i.e . , to the extent that it is sufficient to suppress the victim ' s resistance , and that such violence or threat of violence does not have to be a victim of theft , fraud , robbery , or a third person who can be traced by a criminal act ;
The act of post - robbery is to be divided into two situations : when the perpetrator acquires property in the former behavior , the law benefits of re - point protection are the property rights and interests and whether the property is obtained as the standard ;
When the perpetrator did not obtain the property in the previous act , the method of re - point protection should be the person ' s rights and interests , which should be based on whether or not the above - mentioned consequences should be caused .
The subjective content of post - robbery suspension is that the actor ' s subjective content is voluntarily giving up illegal possession of his property or resisting arrest , destroying the intent of the crime , and objectively stopping the acts of violence or violence . In addition , it should be guided by the legal nature of the suspension of the crime and adopt a step - by - step judgement when judging the automatic nature of the robbery .
The validity condition of post - robbery suspension is that the perpetrator automatically gives up the violence , acts of violence and no longer continues to implement it , and when the result of the suspension does not have a causal relationship with the result of the crime and the perpetrator automatically gives up the repeated violations , the perpetrator is also established .
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.35

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 龍洋;;論轉化型搶劫罪的既遂與未遂形態(tài)——從法律擬制的視角[J];河北法學;2009年06期

2 戴有舉;轉化型搶劫罪若干問題探討[J];人民檢察;2003年02期

3 陳凌;論事后搶劫的既遂與未遂[J];人民檢察;2005年21期

4 王世斌;;轉化型搶劫罪不應存在未遂形態(tài)[J];人民檢察;2007年16期

5 李�；�;;搶劫罪的對象、標準及轉化問題研究[J];人民檢察;2007年18期

6 金坤;;轉化型搶劫罪存在未遂形態(tài)[J];人民檢察;2007年21期

7 章惠萍;轉化型搶劫罪成立的條件[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2004年01期

8 李希慧,杜國強;身份犯及其相關概念辨析[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2005年02期

9 謝彤;關于搶劫罪既遂問題的思考[J];政法論叢;2003年06期

，

本文編號：2023403