發(fā)布時間：2018-06-11 09:30

  本文選題：利用影響力受賄罪 + 犯罪主體　； 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文首先對利用影響力受賄罪的概念進行法條介紹,之后對本罪的立法背景及立法沿革進行分析展開。在社會現(xiàn)實生活中,反腐敗斗爭面臨新的形勢、新的難題,一方面是出于進一步打擊腐敗犯罪的社會現(xiàn)實需要,另一方面,國際社會中普遍將利用影響力受賄行為進行立法,我國在賄賂犯罪方面也注重與國際社會公約相接軌,在加入《聯(lián)合國反腐敗公約》后積極的履行自身的國際義務(wù),因此,利用影響力受賄罪的設(shè)立也是順應(yīng)時代發(fā)展的要求,應(yīng)運而生。在本罪設(shè)立后,對本罪名的司法實踐中的應(yīng)用自然引起社會各界的廣泛關(guān)注。司法實踐當(dāng)中,因本罪發(fā)現(xiàn)難、取證難等特征,我國查處的利用影響力受賄案件數(shù)量很少,辦理過程中所遭遇的困難重重,這與立法時社會各界的期待以及當(dāng)前反腐敗的嚴(yán)峻形勢形成很大的落差。筆者選取了全國首例(以結(jié)案時間計)利用影響力受賄罪作為典型案例,此案判決在當(dāng)時社會引起轟動,社會各界對此案進行廣泛討論,爭議主要圍繞以下兩個方面：一個方面是被告人馬克作為領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的司機是否可以被認(rèn)定為與國家工作人員“關(guān)系密切的人”,即為利用影響力受賄罪的犯罪主體；另一個方面是被告人馬克在案中是否對其領(lǐng)導(dǎo)產(chǎn)生了“影響力”,幫助請托人獲取不正當(dāng)利益。從這兩方面爭議中可以發(fā)現(xiàn),我國利用影響力受賄罪的犯罪主體的認(rèn)定具有一定的模糊性,這也是本罪立法中的不足,本文將在下文對中外關(guān)于利用影響力受賄類犯罪主體認(rèn)定進行比較研究,借鑒國外的優(yōu)秀立法,對利用影響力受賄罪犯罪主體的立法不足,提出自己的淺見,加以完善。
[Abstract]:This paper first introduces the concept of bribery by influence, and then analyzes the legislative background and legislative evolution of the crime. In the real life of the society, the struggle against corruption is faced with a new situation, new difficulties, on the one hand, the need to further crack down on the crime of corruption, and on the other hand, the international community will generally make use of the influence of bribery to legislate. China also pays attention to the bribery crime in line with the international conventions, and actively performs its international obligations after joining the United Nations Convention against Corruption. Therefore, the establishment of bribery crime with influence is also in line with the requirements of the development of the times. emerge as the times require After the establishment of this crime, the application of this crime in judicial practice naturally aroused widespread concern from all walks of life. In judicial practice, because of the characteristics of this crime, such as difficult to find, difficult to obtain evidence, the number of bribery cases with influence investigated and dealt with in our country is very small, and there are many difficulties encountered in the process of handling this crime. This is different from the expectation of society and the serious situation of anti-corruption. The author selected the first case in China (in terms of closing time) to use the crime of accepting bribes with influence as a typical case. The verdict caused a stir in the society at that time, and the case was extensively discussed by all sectors of the society. The controversy mainly revolves around the following two aspects: one aspect is whether the defendant Mark, as a leading driver, can be regarded as a person who is closely related to the state functionary, that is, the subject of crime of taking bribes by using his influence; The other is whether the defendant, Mark, had "influence" over his leadership in the case, helping the trustee gain an unfair advantage. From these two disputes, we can find that the identification of the subject of crime of taking bribes with influence in our country has certain ambiguity, which is also the deficiency in the legislation of this crime. This paper will make a comparative study on the identification of the subject of bribery crime with influence in China and abroad, draw lessons from the excellent legislation of foreign countries, put forward their own simple views and perfect the legislation of the crime subject of taking bribes by influence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D924.392

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 汪維才;;論影響力交易罪的基本構(gòu)造與轉(zhuǎn)化適用[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期

2 李德民;非正式組織和非權(quán)力性影響力[J];中國行政管理;1997年09期

，

本文編號：2004766