發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-10 17:22

  本文選題：性權(quán)利 + 男性性權(quán)利保護(hù)��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會發(fā)展導(dǎo)致的文化、觀念的日趨多元化,公民的不同性取向也日漸得到整個(gè)社會的包容。而隨著性取向的愈發(fā)自由,接踵而至的是各種新型性犯罪的層出不窮。除了傳統(tǒng)的女性受害者外,包括男性在內(nèi)的任何人均有可能成為性犯罪的受害者。而縱觀我國現(xiàn)有的刑法規(guī)定,主要著力于對女性性權(quán)利的保護(hù),對未成年人性權(quán)利的保護(hù)有所涉及但并不完善,對于成年男性性權(quán)利的保護(hù)近年來有所進(jìn)步,但筆者認(rèn)為仍有不足。立法上的不足也導(dǎo)致了學(xué)術(shù)界在男性是否能夠成為強(qiáng)奸罪的受害人、婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸是否構(gòu)成強(qiáng)奸、對未成年人的性侵害是否適用嚴(yán)格責(zé)任等問題上產(chǎn)生了分歧。筆者認(rèn)為,隨著社會的發(fā)展,公民性權(quán)利的刑法保護(hù)也應(yīng)相應(yīng)地進(jìn)行充分變革,故筆者試圖以本文來做一研究與闡述。本文共分為三章:第一章為概述,分為兩節(jié),作為后文論述展開的基礎(chǔ)。第一節(jié)闡述了刑法中的性交、性權(quán)利等基本概念的界定,并著重體現(xiàn)了隨著社會發(fā)展而不斷進(jìn)化完善的過程,現(xiàn)代社會中性交的概念已不再局限于“男性性器官”進(jìn)入“女性性器官”。第二節(jié)闡述了我國公民性權(quán)利保護(hù)的立法沿革,主要包括我國刑法對公民性權(quán)利保護(hù)的立法演變、《刑法修正案(九)》關(guān)于公民性權(quán)利保護(hù)的規(guī)定以及我國刑法對公民性權(quán)利的保護(hù)尚存不足之處三方面內(nèi)容。第二章重點(diǎn)闡述了隨著社會的不斷發(fā)展,我國刑法對成年男性性權(quán)利的刑法保護(hù)愈發(fā)顯得不足。本章主要從男性性權(quán)利受侵害的主要類型、域外刑法對男性性權(quán)利保護(hù)的刑事立法模式以及完善刑法對男性性權(quán)利保護(hù)的必要性和可行性等方面進(jìn)行了論述。男性遭受的性侵害具有特殊性,其來源可能是來自異性,也可能是來自同性。從統(tǒng)計(jì)結(jié)果來看,針對男性的性侵害來自同性的情形更為常見,這也與針對女性的性侵害主要來自異性有所區(qū)別。從各國立法實(shí)踐來看,無論大陸法系國家、英美法系國家還是我國的港、澳、臺地區(qū),均在立法中趨向于對男性性權(quán)利的保護(hù)予以重視,主要體現(xiàn)在將性犯罪的犯罪對象從過去傳統(tǒng)的女性,擴(kuò)大到包含男性。筆者認(rèn)為,無論是社會發(fā)展提出的迫切需求,還是其他法域立法的趨勢,均為我國加強(qiáng)對男性性權(quán)利的刑法保護(hù)提出了要求。我國刑法和司法實(shí)踐中對男性性權(quán)利保護(hù)的不足,有其歷史原因。首先是源于長期以來占據(jù)社會主流思想地位的男尊女卑思想和男權(quán)本位思想。在這種思想的影響下,普遍認(rèn)為兩性之間的性關(guān)系,永遠(yuǎn)是男性獲得了資源,占到了便宜,自然談不上需要對男性性權(quán)利進(jìn)行保護(hù)。其次,我國傳統(tǒng)思想對同性之間的情感視為禁忌,不愿承認(rèn),避之不及,故對社會上實(shí)際存在的男男性行為視而不見,導(dǎo)同性的性侵犯無法被認(rèn)定為強(qiáng)奸。然而,近年來見報(bào)的男性被性侵的案件數(shù)量激增,其所帶來的社會后果不可忽視。這也反映了必須從立法角度對男性性權(quán)利進(jìn)行刑法保護(hù)的必要性。無論是基于憲法精神,還是基于完善刑法功能之需要,都應(yīng)當(dāng)將男性納入強(qiáng)奸罪的犯罪對象�！缎谭ㄐ拚�案(九)》已經(jīng)邁出了第一步,將“強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱婦女罪”修改為“強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱罪”,相當(dāng)于將全體公民不分性別、年齡地納入到了本罪的犯罪對象之中,這也可以認(rèn)為是近年來我國逐步加大對男性性權(quán)利保護(hù)的一種立法趨勢。第三章主要論述我國對成年女性以及未成年人性權(quán)利的刑法保護(hù)上的一些不足,包括婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸是否能夠得到認(rèn)定,以及在認(rèn)定未成年人性權(quán)利被侵害時(shí)是否應(yīng)適用嚴(yán)格責(zé)任等問題。關(guān)于強(qiáng)奸罪侵害的法益屬于何種性質(zhì),也隨著社會觀念的發(fā)展變化而經(jīng)歷了財(cái)產(chǎn)法益、道德法益、權(quán)利法益的發(fā)展變化的過程。在現(xiàn)有法律理論體系下,以及在倫理學(xué)、性學(xué)等其他學(xué)科的體系內(nèi),既然性已成為歸屬女性自身的,女性可獨(dú)立自主決定是否與包括丈夫在內(nèi)的任何男性進(jìn)行性交,那么婚姻關(guān)系似乎不應(yīng)再成為免責(zé)的保護(hù)傘,丈夫在某些情況下應(yīng)可以成為強(qiáng)奸罪的主體。筆者建議在現(xiàn)有的《刑法》規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,區(qū)分婚姻所處的不同狀態(tài),對婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸罪的認(rèn)定做出詳細(xì)的規(guī)定,且建議不以受害人的告訴為前提,以完善對婚姻關(guān)系存續(xù)期間女性性權(quán)利的保護(hù)。在未成年人性權(quán)利保護(hù)方面,未成年人與成年人最主要的區(qū)別在于無法正確認(rèn)識性行為的意義,以及性行為對自身的危害性。故在對未成年人性權(quán)利進(jìn)行保護(hù)時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)適用嚴(yán)格責(zé)任,即不應(yīng)以行為人明知或應(yīng)當(dāng)明知行為對象是未成年人為前提,而應(yīng)一律以行為對象的年齡是否處于特殊保護(hù)的區(qū)間為準(zhǔn)則。當(dāng)然,對于行為人確實(shí)因疏忽產(chǎn)生“誤認(rèn)”的情況(如因幼女生理發(fā)育較為成熟而導(dǎo)致行為人疏忽而未核實(shí)行為對象的年齡等情形),可在量刑時(shí)予以相應(yīng)的考量與平衡。
[Abstract]:With the culture caused by social development and the growing diversity of ideas, the different sexual orientation of citizens is also increasingly inclusive of the whole society. With the increasing freedom of sexual orientation, all kinds of new sex crimes emerge in endlessly. In addition to the traditional female victims, any person including men, including men, may become a sexual offender. The protection of female sexual rights is mainly focused on the protection of female sexual rights, but the protection of sexual rights of minors is involved but not perfect. The protection of sexual rights for adult males has progressed in recent years, but the author thinks there are still shortcomings. As a victim of rape, whether marital rape constitutes rape or not, there is a difference in the strict liability for sexual abuse of minors. The author believes that with the development of the society, the criminal law protection of civil rights should be fully changed, so the author tries to do a research and Exposition in this article. The first chapter is divided into three chapters: the first chapter is divided into two sections, which are divided into two sections. The first section expounds the definition of the basic concepts of sexual intercourse and sexual rights in criminal law, and emphasizes the process of continuous evolution and perfection with the development of society. The concept of sexual intercourse in modern society is no longer limited to "male sex organs" entering the "male sex organs". The second section expounds the legislative evolution of the protection of citizens' sexual rights in our country, mainly including the legislative evolution of the protection of civil rights in our criminal law, the amendment of the criminal law (nine), the provisions on the protection of civil rights and the three aspects of the protection of the civil rights in our criminal law. The second chapter focuses on the explanation. With the continuous development of the society, the criminal law of China has become more and more inadequate in criminal law protection for adult male sexual rights. This chapter mainly from the main types of male sexual rights infringement, the criminal legislation mode of the extraterritorial criminal law on the protection of male sexual rights and the necessity and feasibility of improving the protection of male sexual rights by criminal law and so on. Sexual assault from men may come from the opposite sex and may be from the same sex. From the statistical results, the sex abuse against men is more common, and the sexual abuse against women is mainly from the opposite sex. From the legislative practice of various countries, civil law countries Home, Anglo American legal system and China's port, Australia and Taiwan area all tend to pay attention to the protection of male sexual rights in legislation, which is mainly reflected in the enlargement of the object of sexual crime from the traditional women to the inclusion of men. It is all for our country to strengthen the protection of male sexual rights in criminal law. There are historical reasons for the lack of male sexual rights protection in our criminal law and judicial practice. First of all, it originated from the patriarchal thought and the male right standard thought which occupied the mainstream ideology of the society for a long time. Under the influence of this thought, it is generally considered that the sexes are sexes The sexual relationship between men and women has always been the resource of men, which has taken advantage of the nature. Naturally, it is not necessary to protect male sexual rights. Secondly, the traditional thoughts of our country are taboo on the emotion between the same sex, unwilling to admit and avoid it, so it is impossible to see the male sex behavior in the society, and the sexual assault of the guide can not be identified. For rape. However, in recent years, the number of men who has been reported to be sexually assaulted has been increasing and the social consequences of it can not be ignored. It also reflects the necessity of criminal law protection for male sexual rights from the legislative point of view. Men should be included in the crime of rape, whether based on the constitutional spirit or the need to improve the function of the criminal law. The criminal law amendment (nine) has taken the first step to amend "compulsory indecency and insult women" as "coercive indecency and insult", which is equivalent to the inclusion of all citizens without gender and age into the object of the crime. This can also be recognized as a gradual increase in the protection of male sexual rights in China in recent years. A legislative trend. The third chapter mainly discusses the shortcomings of our country's criminal law protection for adult women and the sexual rights of minors, including whether marital rape can be identified, and whether strict liability should be applied to the identification of the sexual rights of minors. With the development and change of social concept, it has experienced the process of the development and change of property law benefit, moral legal benefit and right legal benefit. In the system of existing legal theory, and in the system of ethics, sexology and other disciplines, since sex has become a woman itself, women can decide independently whether to include anything including husbands. The marriage relationship seems not to be an exemption umbrella, and the husband should be the subject of the crime of rape in some cases. The author suggests that on the basis of the existing provisions of the criminal law, the different state of marriage should be distinguished and the determination of the crime of rape in marriage is specified in detail, and the suggestion is not to be taken by the victim. It is the premise to improve the protection of sexual rights of women during the marriage relationship. In the protection of the sexual rights of minors, the main difference between minors and adults lies in the inability to correctly recognize the meaning of sexual behavior and the harmfulness of sexual behavior to themselves. Responsibility should not be based on the premise that the perpetrator knows or should know that the object of behavior is a minor, and should be the criterion of whether the age of the object is in a special protection. Of course, for the perpetrator, the situation of "misrecognition" is indeed caused by negligence (such as the neglect of the perpetrator because of the maturity of the young girl's hairdresser. " When the age of the object is implemented, it can be considered and balanced in sentencing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D924

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王蘇平,苗玉紅;解讀“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”問題[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

2 李立眾;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸定性研究──婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸在我國應(yīng)構(gòu)成強(qiáng)奸罪[J];中國刑事法雜志;2001年01期

3 李艷梅;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸立法探析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年09期

4 印衛(wèi)東;論婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年05期

5 吳曙明;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸是否構(gòu)成犯罪[J];人民公安;2002年13期

6 周敏;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸罪初探[J];廣東商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年S1期

7 楊永華;論“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”行為[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

8 安翱;論“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”[J];石河子大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期

9 馬占超;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的理論爭鳴和立法探究[J];湘潭工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2003年04期

10 冀祥德;域外婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸法之發(fā)展及其啟示[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2005年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 陳芳琴;;從強(qiáng)奸罪的立法原意再談“婚內(nèi)無奸”[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（2008年第3輯）[C];2008年

2 夏涼;;對婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)迫性交行為出入罪之理性探索[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第2輯）[C];2010年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 洪范南;“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”立法是一大進(jìn)步[N];人民代表報(bào);2007年

2 梁園園;本案是否構(gòu)成“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2014年

3 蘇磊 奚伯榮;應(yīng)將婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸納入強(qiáng)奸罪[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2005年

4 陳新華　邱正江;對婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸犯罪基本制度設(shè)計(jì)之管見[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2009年

5 楊濤;佛山案例能催生“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”立法嗎？[N];檢察日報(bào);2010年

6 富心振　李鵬飛;家父逼婚引發(fā)“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”案[N];中國婦女報(bào);2011年

7 項(xiàng)冬;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸構(gòu)成強(qiáng)奸罪嗎[N];西部法制報(bào);2012年

8 陳禮國;“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”的罪與非罪[N];廣西政法報(bào);2001年

9 本報(bào)記者 曾精明 通訊員 周天寶 楊學(xué)兵 蔣芬;“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”：是道德問題還是犯罪？[N];檢察日報(bào);2000年

10 張琮軍;淺析“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”在司法中的認(rèn)定[N];今日信息報(bào);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 趙婷;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

2 雷丹;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問題研究[D];河南大學(xué);2010年

3 付焯煒;論婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

4 王冠;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸若干問題研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2010年

5 蔡克;“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”若干問題的研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2004年

6 陳靜;論婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

7 張劍蘭;“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”研究[D];西南大學(xué);2008年

8 張漢章;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問題之思考[D];蘭州大學(xué);2008年

9 沈成莉;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

10 陳峰;論“婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸”[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2004005