發(fā)布時間：2018-06-09 23:44

  本文選題：教唆犯 + 獨立性�。� 參考：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：共同犯罪現象一直是刑法學界最熱門的議題，而教唆犯罪更是共犯研究者們致力研究的熱點。放眼國內外刑法理論的研究現狀，“教唆犯獨立性說”和“教唆犯從屬性說”相互批判和博弈長期存在，使得研究的熱度如火如荼。雖然通說以“教唆犯二重性”的觀點來加以調和，但只是使得兩對立觀點之爭得到短時間的偃旗息鼓，卻從未使兩派達成一致而真正告一段落。 國內有學者指出教唆行為性質的確認是教唆犯理論研究的首要問題。誠然，教唆犯性質的確定是研究教唆犯其他理論的基石和起點，所以正確認識和把握教唆犯的性質，有助刑法研究者進一步研究教唆犯的完成形態(tài)、教唆犯的犯罪構成、教唆犯的處罰根據以及教唆犯在刑法中的地位等其他理論。 所謂“前人種樹后人乘涼”，先哲們的刑法思潮給后人們留下了難以估量的幫助和啟迪，他們的研究成果給新一輩年輕學者們留下了寶貴的研究思路和研究方法，無論本文闡述得成功與否，筆者都是站在一大批“巨人”的肩膀上。各論者們在闡述教唆犯性質的觀點時，無論是自成一派或是對原有觀點進行修正，都少不了對那些觀點的引證和描述。 本文共分三個部分，字數近六萬字，主要內容如下： 第一部分是關于教唆犯性質的理論聚訟。這一部分筆者通過比較和總結，根據各學說的基本主張把它們分為四個大類，分析了各類學說的缺陷，，闡述了這些學說對筆者后文的論述所帶來的啟示。 第二部分是關于教唆犯本質的理論剖析。這一部分重點介紹了教唆犯從屬性和獨立性兩學說的對立，以及兩觀點對立的實質。該部分首先對通說的二重性進行展開，分析出隱藏在這傳統(tǒng)觀點下的理論矛盾以及二重性表象的對立，進而在后文中對教唆犯從屬性學說和獨立性學說分別展開論述，從傳統(tǒng)的論據中找出論述中的缺陷和破綻，引出筆者對教唆犯性質的實質的理解。 第三部分是關于教唆犯獨立性的理論探索。這一部分筆者首先對“間接教唆”、“教唆他人自殺自殘”、分則中教唆獨立罪名等現象進行闡述，通過這些現象的分析對教唆犯從屬性的觀點產生質疑，然后聯系教唆犯區(qū)別與其他共犯的特性對教唆犯的獨立性進行闡述，進而得出自己對教唆行為在非共犯階段和共犯階段的獨立性的不同理解，最后結合筆者主張的“犯罪構成獨立”、“處罰獨立”等觀點來適用和處理司法實踐中相關教唆犯問題。 總而言之，教唆行為性質的研究無論是對教唆犯理論本身的夯實和完善，還是對其他刑法問題的運用和指導，都具有著非常重大的理論價值和實踐意義。
[Abstract]:The phenomenon of joint crime has always been the hottest topic in the criminal law field, and the abetting crime is the research hotspot of accomplice researchers. Looking at the current research situation of criminal law theory at home and abroad, the mutual criticism and game between abettor independence theory and abettor accessory theory exist for a long time, which makes the research hot. Although the general theory is conciliated by the view of "the duality of abettor", it only causes the dispute between the two opposing views to be silenced for a short period of time. Some domestic scholars have pointed out that the confirmation of the nature of abetting act is the primary problem in the theoretical study of abettor. It is true that the determination of the nature of the abettor is the cornerstone and starting point of studying the other theories of the abettor, so the correct understanding and grasp of the nature of the abettor will help the criminal law researchers to further study the completion form of the abettor and the criminal constitution of the abettor. The basis for the punishment of abettors and other theories such as the status of abettors in the criminal law. The so-called "the former planted trees for later generations to take advantage of the cool", the ideological trend in criminal law of the forefathers and philosophers left incalculable help and inspiration to the posterity. Their research results have left valuable research ideas and methods for the new generation of young scholars. Whether this paper is successful or not, the author stands on the shoulders of a large number of "giants". In expounding the nature of the abettor, all the commentators, whether they are in the same school or revising the original views, cannot fail to cite and describe those views. This paper is divided into three parts, with nearly 60,000 words. The main contents are as follows: the first part is about the theory of abettor. This part of the author through comparison and summary, according to the basic claims of each theory to divide them into four broad categories, analyzed the defects of various theories, The second part is about the theoretical analysis of the nature of abettor. This part focuses on the adversarial and independence of abettor, as well as the essence of the opposition. This part begins with the duality of the general theory, analyzes the theoretical contradictions hidden in this traditional view and the opposition of the duality representation, and then discusses the theory of accessory attribute and the theory of independence of the abettor respectively in the following articles. From the traditional argument to find out the defects and flaws in the discussion, leading to the author's essence of the nature of the instigator understanding. The third part is about the theoretical exploration of the independence of the abettor. In this part, the author first expounds the phenomena of "indirect abetting", "abetting others to commit suicide self-harm", abetting the crime of independence, and so on. Through the analysis of these phenomena, the author questions the views of the accomplice of the abettor. Then the independence of the abettor is expounded in relation to the distinction between the abettor and the other accomplices, and the different understandings of the independence of the abettor in the non-accomplice stage and the accomplice stage are obtained. Finally, combining the author's viewpoints of "independent constitution of crime" and "independence of punishment" to apply and deal with the problems of abettor in judicial practice. The study of the nature of abettor behavior is of great theoretical value and practical significance whether it is the consolidation and perfection of the theory of abettor itself or the application and guidance of other criminal law issues.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D914

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 余淦才;;試論教唆犯的刑事責任[J];安徽大學學報;1983年02期

2 楊興培;論共同犯罪人的分類依據與立法完善[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;1996年05期

3 胡海;;論教唆他人自殺的犯罪性來源[J];福建警察學院學報;2008年03期

4 馬克昌;;論教唆犯[J];法律學習與研究;1987年05期

5 肖本山;;“教唆未遂”詮釋新解——關于體系性解釋和目的解釋方法的適用[J];法學評論;2007年05期

6 王昭武;;論共犯的最小從屬性說——日本共犯從屬性理論的發(fā)展與借鑒[J];法學;2007年11期

7 郄俊s

本文編號：2001235