發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-01 18:28

  本文選題：保田與重郎 + 《蒙疆》��； 參考：《外國(guó)文學(xué)評(píng)論》2017年01期

【摘要】：日本作家保田與重郎1938年的"滿蒙鮮支"之旅有著強(qiáng)烈的政治意味。在《蒙疆》中,他拒斥關(guān)于戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的客觀報(bào)道,拒絕國(guó)際聯(lián)盟對(duì)侵略戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的束縛,試圖通過對(duì)日本古典價(jià)值的復(fù)活、對(duì)蒙古式"原始精神"以及"日本精神"的鼓吹等來實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)西方"十九世紀(jì)"倫理的否定,但最終其"日本主義"以玄言虛語(yǔ)的堆砌慘淡收?qǐng)�。保田推崇永樂、康熙、乾隆等明清雄主縱橫亞洲的開疆拓土之業(yè),呼吁日本對(duì)中國(guó)放棄"懷柔"而采取強(qiáng)硬態(tài)度。在種族根性和藝術(shù)品格上,他有意掩飾日本的滿蒙侵略造成中國(guó)邊疆危機(jī)的歷史因由,將清民之際中國(guó)政府"移民實(shí)邊"的應(yīng)對(duì)措施扭曲、夸大為漢族對(duì)周邊少數(shù)民族的侵略,以此強(qiáng)化"日-滿-蒙"共進(jìn)退的命運(yùn)連帶感;同時(shí),在文化價(jià)值上,他又為東亞諸民族做出了"日—鮮/滿/蒙—漢"的層級(jí)劃分,貶低近代中國(guó)而抬高日本本土以及滿、蒙、鮮等殖民地或親日傀儡政權(quán)地區(qū)的文化價(jià)值。這種致力于建構(gòu)"中心的塌陷和周邊的隆起"的東亞文化層級(jí)的話語(yǔ)行為與戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期日本"去中心的中心化"的思想建構(gòu)以及"大東亞新秩序"的政治戰(zhàn)略構(gòu)成了一種相互支撐的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Japanese writer Po Tian and Chun Lang's trip to Manchuria Xianzhi in 1938 had strong political implications. In Mongol, he rejects the objective report of the war, rejects the League of Nations' bondage to the war of aggression, and attempts to revive the classical values of Japan. The preaching of Mongolian "primitive spirit" and "Japanese spirit" to realize the negation of the western "nineteenth century" ethics, but finally its "Japanism" ended in a dismal heap of metaphysical words. Baotian praised Yongle, Kangxi, Qianlong and other Ming and Qing Dynasty masters to open up the territory of Asia, calling on Japan to give up "Huairou" and take a tough attitude towards China. In terms of his ethnic roots and artistic character, he deliberately concealed the historical cause of the crisis in China's frontier caused by the Japanese invasion of Manchu and Mongolia, distorted the response of the Chinese government to "emigrating to the real border" during the Qing Dynasty, and exaggerated the Han nationality's aggression against the surrounding ethnic minorities. In this way, he strengthened the sense of conjunctive fate of "Japanese-Manchury-Mongol," and at the same time, in terms of cultural values, he divided the "Japanese-fresh / Manchu / Mongolian-Han" hierarchy for the peoples of East Asia, thereby devaluing modern China and elevating Japan's native land and Manchu. Cultural values of colonial or pro-Japanese puppet regimes in Mongolia and other countries. This kind of discourse behavior at East Asian cultural level devoted to the construction of "the collapse of the center and the uplift of the periphery" and the ideological construction of the "decentralization" of Japan during the war and the political strategic composition of the "New order of Greater East Asia" A mutually supportive relationship.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)外文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“‘東方學(xué)’體系構(gòu)建與中國(guó)的東方學(xué)研究”(14ZD083)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：I313.06
，

本文編號(hào)：2088680