《新元史》的編纂與校勘
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-12 08:35
【摘要】：《新元史》成于一人之手,而被列入"廿六史",成為正史的殿軍之作,值得特別關注。民國初年梁啟超、王國維等以"新史"的標準衡量此書,頗有批評,而日本學者的評價卻從同于乾嘉學術的代表作《四庫總目提要》的觀點,顯現(xiàn)出現(xiàn)代史學的吊詭�！缎略贰返木幾胧加谇迥�,成于民初,跨越時代;其刊印先有鉛排本,后有雕版本,實為復古�！缎略贰返男？�,也存在庚午重訂本訛誤,反不如退耕堂初刻本之處,令人意外。
[Abstract]:The history of the New Yuan Dynasty was made into the hands of one man, and it was included in the "26 History" and became the work of the temple army in the official history, which deserves special attention. In the early years of the Republic of China, Liang Qichao and Wang Guowei criticized the book by the standard of "New History," but Japanese scholars commented from the same viewpoint as the masterpiece of the Qianjia academic work, "Summary of the four storeys". The compilation of "New Yuan History" began in the late Qing Dynasty and began in the early Republic of China. It was printed in a lead-lined form, followed by a carved version, which was in fact a retro. The collation of the "New Yuan History" also contained errors in rerevising the book at the end of the day. Instead, it is better to return to farming hall at the beginning of the original engraved place, surprising.
【作者單位】： 湖南科技學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目“《四庫全書考證》整理與研究”(項目編號:17BTQ039)
【分類號】：K247
，
本文編號：2178519
[Abstract]:The history of the New Yuan Dynasty was made into the hands of one man, and it was included in the "26 History" and became the work of the temple army in the official history, which deserves special attention. In the early years of the Republic of China, Liang Qichao and Wang Guowei criticized the book by the standard of "New History," but Japanese scholars commented from the same viewpoint as the masterpiece of the Qianjia academic work, "Summary of the four storeys". The compilation of "New Yuan History" began in the late Qing Dynasty and began in the early Republic of China. It was printed in a lead-lined form, followed by a carved version, which was in fact a retro. The collation of the "New Yuan History" also contained errors in rerevising the book at the end of the day. Instead, it is better to return to farming hall at the beginning of the original engraved place, surprising.
【作者單位】： 湖南科技學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目“《四庫全書考證》整理與研究”(項目編號:17BTQ039)
【分類號】：K247
，
本文編號：2178519
本文鏈接：http://www.lk138.cn/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2178519.html
