本文選題：九諦九解 + 性　； 參考：《湖北社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年07期

【摘要】：晚明之時(shí),圍繞著心學(xué)中"無(wú)善無(wú)惡"的命題,許孚遠(yuǎn)與周汝登進(jìn)行了一場(chǎng)反復(fù)持續(xù)的爭(zhēng)論,史稱"九諦九解"之辯。論辯圍繞性體、工夫、教化三方面展開(kāi)。許孚遠(yuǎn)批評(píng)"無(wú)善無(wú)惡"說(shuō)不合圣人之教,周汝登則堅(jiān)持心學(xué)的這一核心命題,對(duì)許孚遠(yuǎn)的批評(píng)逐一反駁。他們的爭(zhēng)論顯示出一個(gè)共同目標(biāo),就是都想用自己的體系來(lái)統(tǒng)一性、道、教三者,擔(dān)當(dāng)儒教大命,然而他們都不成功。
[Abstract]:In the late Ming Dynasty, Xu Fuyuan and Zhou Ruden had a continuous debate about the proposition of "no good and no evil" in the study of mind. The argument revolves around sex, work and education. Xu Fuyuan criticizes the theory of "no good and no evil" does not conform to the religion of sage, while Zhou Ru-deng insists on this core proposition of heart learning and refutes Xu Fuyuan's criticism one by one. Their argument shows a common goal, that is, they want to use their own system to unify, Tao, teach the three, to play the Confucian mandate, but they did not succeed.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學(xué)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)高等研究院;
【基金】：重慶市社科規(guī)劃辦哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃研究項(xiàng)目博士項(xiàng)目“周汝登心學(xué)思想與晚明儒學(xué)本體論思想變遷研究”(2014BS016)階段性成果 中央高�；�本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)項(xiàng)目(106112015 CDJSK 47 XK31)
【分類號(hào)】：K248.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鄭禮炬;;明代正德至嘉靖間湖州峴山社考論——以劉麟為中心[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1878046