發(fā)布時間：2019-07-05 13:58

【摘要】：這篇論文是以金代社會等級結(jié)構(gòu)為研究對象,全面介紹了金代社會各等級以及等級內(nèi)部各階層的身份地位、權(quán)利義務(wù)、生存處境等基本狀況,并進(jìn)一步探討了他們之間的相互關(guān)系、社會流變、社會表現(xiàn),進(jìn)而加深了對整個金代社會歷史了解。本文包括六部分: 第一章導(dǎo)論。從理論的角度界定了等級和階級的不同,探討了研究等級結(jié)構(gòu)在研究古代社會歷史中的特殊性和重要性。從方法的角度提出了研究等級結(jié)構(gòu)應(yīng)注意強(qiáng)調(diào)法律地位和權(quán)利義務(wù)的研究,應(yīng)借鑒社會學(xué)、法律學(xué)的研究方法。 第二章貴族。劃分了貴族各階層,描述了他們的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)特權(quán)。對貴族間的矛盾斗爭作了性質(zhì)上的分析�？陀^評價了貴族在金初的特殊貢獻(xiàn),及歷史成因。 第三章品官。表述了各級品官所承擔(dān)的職務(wù)、職長和所享受的待遇,總結(jié)了其中的特點。對品官的來源、品官的遷轉(zhuǎn),以及國家對品官的管理制度作了必要的考察。對漢官在金代社會政治生活中的表現(xiàn),給予了充分肯定。對當(dāng)時各機(jī)構(gòu)中的吏員階層進(jìn)行嘗試性研究,首次揭示了金代吏員的基本狀況。 第四章平民。對社會各種職業(yè)的平民的法律地位和權(quán)利義務(wù)進(jìn)行了分別表述。對女真農(nóng)業(yè)平民貧困化的原因作了補(bǔ)充分析,指出女真農(nóng)業(yè)平民的貧困化絕不單純是生活的墮落,而是由于掠奪戰(zhàn)爭的結(jié)束,及封建因素的影響,使傳統(tǒng)奴隸制的生產(chǎn)方式走向破產(chǎn)造成的,這種破產(chǎn)來源于兩個“不足”,一是勞動力的補(bǔ)充不足,一是土地的補(bǔ)充不足。同時,討論了漢族農(nóng)業(yè)平民的貧困的特殊原因。最后,對國家的解困政策和措施進(jìn)行了分析評價。 第五章奴婢。對金代奴婢進(jìn)行了類別劃分,對各類奴婢的身份差別進(jìn)行了辨析。在辨析過程中,糾正了前人的錯誤認(rèn)識,如認(rèn)為監(jiān)戶的來源有奴婢;把官戶的勞作混同于宮中工匠等。對“奴婢戶”這個學(xué)術(shù)界普遍認(rèn)為不存在的戶類作了推斷,認(rèn)為“奴婢戶”作為國家奴婢是存在的,并且數(shù)量很大。本部分還以奴婢為切入點,討論了金代的社會性質(zhì),認(rèn)為金代在章宗朝以前是兩種社會形態(tài)并存,女真人本身的社會形態(tài)還保持著奴隸制,到章宗朝這種“二元體制”才開始向“一元體制”過度,并最終完成。 第六章金代社會等級結(jié)構(gòu)的主要特征。通過與遼代、元代相比較,概括了金代社會等級結(jié)構(gòu)的兩個明顯的特征:一是社會等級中雖然民族差異表現(xiàn)明顯,但尚未達(dá)到遼代、元代那樣的程度;二是金代雖然也信奉佛教,但始終沒有形成僧侶貴族階層。對于這兩種現(xiàn)象,本文分析認(rèn)為,第一點與女真人本身也是農(nóng)耕文化類型有關(guān)。第二點與防止宗教惑亂民眾的政治目的和推崇儒學(xué)的文化取向,以及女真人的薩滿教信仰有關(guān)。 通過這六部分的系統(tǒng)研究,我們獲得了對整個金代社會等級狀況的全面的認(rèn)識。 當(dāng)然,本文還很不成熟,所列問題的表述和分析還很不到位,有些問題尚未 提及。這都需要作進(jìn)一步深入研究。 關(guān)鍵詞:金代、社會等級、法律身份、權(quán)利義務(wù)。
[Abstract]:This paper, based on the social class structure of the Jin Dynasty, introduced the basic conditions of the status, the rights and the rights and obligations and the survival situation of all classes of the Jin Dynasty, and further discussed the relationship between them, the social development and the social performance. And further, the historical understanding of the whole golden generation society is deepened. This article includes six parts: In the first chapter, from the perspective of the theory, the differences of the class and the class are defined, and the structure of the research level in the study of the ancient social history is discussed. The particularity and importance of the study grade structure from the angle of the method should pay attention to the study of the legal status and the rights and obligations, and should draw on the sociology, The Study of Legal Studies Methods. Chapter II, the nobles. The aristocrats were divided. All walks of life describe their political and economic privileges. On the basis of the analysis of the contradiction between the nobles, the objective evaluation The nobles at the beginning of the golden age The special contribution, and the cause of history. Chapter 3. Article 3. Expression of all levels of product The duties, the length of the service and the treatment enjoyed by the official, and the characteristics of them are summarized. The transfer of the official, as well as the management system of the state-to-product officer, made the necessary examination To make full recognition of the performance of the Han official in the political life of the Jin Dynasty. The level of the Marines is to be In the first time, the basic condition of the Jin Dynasty was revealed. Chapter four civilians. The legal status and the rights and obligations of the civilians in various occupations of the society are stated separately. The causes of the poverty of the women's real agricultural civilians are analyzed, and it is pointed out that the poverty of the women's real agricultural civilians is not simply the degradation of life, but due to the fact that The end of the plundering war, and the influence of the feudal factors, caused the mode of production of the traditional slavery to the bankruptcy, which originated from two "trunks>" def. Efficiency ", the first is the labor force In addition, the shortage of land is not enough. At the same time, the Han Dynasty is discussed. family-based The special causes of poverty. Finally, the policy and measures to solve the problem of the state are analyzed and evaluated. In the fifth chapter, the author makes a distinction between the different types of serfdom and the identity of all kinds of serfdom. In the course of the analysis, the author has corrected the misconception of the predecessors, such as the view that the source of the supervisor is a slave, the labor of the official family is mixed with the craftsman of the palace, etc. There is a general agreement in the "a slave of a family" that there is no account in the academic field, and it is considered that < This part also discusses the social nature of the Jin Dynasty as the entry point of the serfdom, and thinks that the Jin Dynasty is the two kind of social form in the former, and the social form of the real person is still the slavery, to the "trunk" and "binary system" Start to

"univ The main characteristics of the structure of the social hierarchy of the Jin Dynasty are summarized in this paper. The structure of the social hierarchy of the Jin Dynasty is summarized by comparison with the Liao Dynasty and the Yuan Dynasty. Two distinct features: one is the social class Although the difference of the ethnic group is obvious, it has not reached the same degree as the Liao Dynasty and the Yuan Dynasty, and the second is the Jin Dynasty. In this case, that first point is the same as that of a woman. The body is also related to the type of farming culture. The second point is to prevent the political purpose of the people and to promote the Confucianism. The cultural orientation, as well as the shamanism of a woman's life. It's through the six. partial system It's a study. We've got the whole gold. A comprehensive understanding of the status of the generation of society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：K246.4

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張婷婷;;金代括戶問題述論[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(社科版);2012年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 解丹;金長城軍事防御體系及其空間規(guī)劃布局研究[D];天津大學(xué);2012年

2 陳德洋;金朝中原鄉(xiāng)村社會控制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

3 王雷;金代吏員研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

4 李玉君;金代宗室研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

5 劉曉飛;金代漢族家庭形態(tài)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 黃運(yùn)剛;論金朝的括地政策[D];哈爾濱師范大學(xué);2010年

2 王文卓;金朝女性社會地位探析[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2010年

3 陳志強(qiáng);《蒙古—衛(wèi)拉特法典》所見衛(wèi)拉特社會等級狀況管窺[D];新疆大學(xué);2010年

4 于菲;金朝前期越軌行為與社會控制探究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2510574