發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-22 15:22

【摘要】：明人刪削《文選》李善注和五臣注,并加己意增述而成明代《文選》刪述本,刪述者(或者是出版者)認(rèn)識(shí)到五臣注與評(píng)點(diǎn)的相通之處與可轉(zhuǎn)化性,在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)注和評(píng)的職能產(chǎn)生明確的分工意識(shí),落實(shí)到版本特征上表現(xiàn)為以版面位置規(guī)定職能分工。隨著版式的約定俗成,位置反過(guò)來(lái)表達(dá)甚至決定職能,以至于評(píng)和注的某些內(nèi)容很難區(qū)分。注釋文本和評(píng)點(diǎn)文本二者的交集——導(dǎo)讀內(nèi)容及其指南性證明了注與評(píng)的共生狀態(tài),以及明代《文選》刪述本的大眾讀本的性質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:The Ming Dynasty deleted Li Shan's note and the five minister's note, and added his own intention to add his own meaning to the deleted text of the Ming Dynasty. The abridder (or publisher) realized the similarities and translatability between the notes and the comments of the five courtiers. On this basis, the functions of the notes and comments produced a clear sense of division of labor, and the implementation of the version characteristics showed that the division of functions was defined by the layout position. With the convention of layout, the position in turn expresses or even determines the function, so that some of the contents of the comment and the note are difficult to distinguish. The intersection of the explanatory text and the comment text, the guided reading content and its guidance, prove the symbiotic state of the note and the evaluation, as well as the nature of the popular reading book of the deleted text in the Ming Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 國(guó)家清史纂修領(lǐng)導(dǎo)小組辦公室;
【基金】：北京大學(xué)博士研究生出國(guó)研究項(xiàng)目基金資助
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K248;G256
，

本文編號(hào)：2504708