發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-13 13:49

  本文選題：社區(qū)　切入點(diǎn)：公共治理　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 隨著改革開放的發(fā)展和社會主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的建立和完善，中國城市社會出現(xiàn)了諸如社會結(jié)構(gòu)急劇變革、單位制解體、城市流動人口增加等巨大變化，城市社區(qū)建設(shè)開始萌芽，隨著社區(qū)的發(fā)展，社區(qū)工作范圍、內(nèi)容、任務(wù)不斷擴(kuò)大和增多，諸多的城市社區(qū)治理問題也相伴產(chǎn)生。社區(qū)公共治理中保安與業(yè)主的關(guān)系問題就像一面鏡子一樣映照出了社區(qū)治理中存在的缺憾。在城市社區(qū)中，仍然沒有一個高效的組織體系，社區(qū)治理的各個主體之間缺乏溝通，缺乏合作，相互協(xié)調(diào)不暢。當(dāng)社區(qū)中的保安和業(yè)產(chǎn)生矛盾糾紛時(shí)，很難實(shí)現(xiàn)各組織之間的資源共享、協(xié)調(diào)合作，不僅導(dǎo)致社區(qū)關(guān)系不和諧，也嚴(yán)重影響和制約社區(qū)的順利發(fā)展。本文以武漢市常青花園和同安家園為個案，結(jié)合治理理論、新公共管理理論、公民參與理論的相關(guān)思想，為我國社區(qū)治理中保安與業(yè)主關(guān)系的調(diào)整提供可供借鑒的理論參考。在國內(nèi)外專家學(xué)者研究社區(qū)治理的理論基礎(chǔ)上，在調(diào)查武漢市新老兩個社區(qū)的實(shí)踐基礎(chǔ)上，圍繞著社區(qū)治理中的保安和業(yè)主關(guān)系問題展開實(shí)地調(diào)研，介紹了目前社區(qū)公共治理現(xiàn)狀，析清調(diào)整城市社區(qū)治理中保安與業(yè)主關(guān)系的困境，基于我國社區(qū)治理現(xiàn)狀，探索和諧保安與業(yè)主關(guān)系的路徑選擇。著重強(qiáng)調(diào)其間由政府主導(dǎo)的多中心治理體系的格局的建構(gòu)，為和諧社區(qū)的建設(shè)提供一個良好的平臺。社區(qū)是社會的細(xì)胞，社區(qū)和諧是社會和諧的基礎(chǔ)。因此，在構(gòu)建一個政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和諧發(fā)展的社會主義社會進(jìn)程中，應(yīng)高度重視和諧社區(qū)建設(shè)，把協(xié)調(diào)社區(qū)關(guān)系，促進(jìn)社區(qū)和諧作為建設(shè)社會主義和諧社會的重要切入點(diǎn)。 本文的創(chuàng)新主要有三點(diǎn)：其一是論文選題的創(chuàng)新。目前理論界還沒有學(xué)者從保安與業(yè)主關(guān)系這一微觀視角去探討社區(qū)治理的深層次問題。筆者以小問題作文章，探究現(xiàn)階段社區(qū)治理中存在的問題；其二是研究工具的創(chuàng)新。本文以公共治理理論為研究工具，從公共治理主體多元化的視角，，建議社區(qū)各組織攜手共建，協(xié)同解決現(xiàn)階段我國社區(qū)治理中保安與業(yè)主關(guān)系問題的困境；其三是研究方法創(chuàng)新。本文采用實(shí)證研究和比較研究的方式，以武漢市常青花園和同安家園為實(shí)證研究對象，通過比較兩個處于不同發(fā)展階段社區(qū)的現(xiàn)狀，尋找調(diào)適社區(qū)治理中保安與業(yè)主關(guān)系的普適性路徑。
[Abstract]:With the development of reform and opening up and the establishment and perfection of the socialist market economy system, great changes have occurred in Chinese urban society, such as the drastic changes in social structure, the disintegration of the unit system, the increase of the floating population in cities, and so on. Urban community construction has begun to sprout. With the development of the community, the scope, content and tasks of community work are expanding and increasing. The relationship between security and owners in community public governance is like a mirror to reflect the shortcomings of community governance. In urban communities, the relationship between security and owners is just like a mirror. There is still no efficient organization system, there is a lack of communication, cooperation and coordination among the various subjects of community governance. When there are contradictions and disputes between the security and industry in the community, it is very difficult to realize the sharing of resources among the organizations. Coordination and cooperation not only lead to disharmony in community relations, but also seriously affect and restrict the smooth development of the community. The related ideas of citizen participation theory can be used for reference in the adjustment of the relationship between security and owners in community governance in our country, and on the basis of the theory of community governance studied by experts and scholars at home and abroad, On the basis of investigating the practice of the two new and old communities in Wuhan, this paper carries out a field investigation around the relationship between security and owners in community governance, and introduces the present situation of community public governance. Based on the current situation of community governance in our country, this paper explores the path choice of harmonious relationship between security guard and owner, and emphasizes the construction of multi-center governance system, which is dominated by the government. To provide a good platform for the construction of a harmonious community. The community is the cell of the society, and the harmony of the community is the foundation of social harmony. Therefore, in the process of building a socialist society with harmonious development of politics, economy and culture, We should attach great importance to the construction of harmonious community, take the coordination of community relations and promote community harmony as the important entry point for building a harmonious socialist society. There are three main points in the innovation of this paper: one is the innovation of the selected topic of the thesis. At present, there are no scholars in the theoretical circle to discuss the deep problems of community governance from the microcosmic perspective of the relationship between the security and the owner. The second is the innovation of research tools. This paper takes the theory of public governance as the research tool, from the perspective of diversification of the main body of public governance, suggests that the community organizations work together to build, The third is the innovation of research methods. This paper takes Changqing Garden and Tongan Home in Wuhan City as the object of empirical research and comparative study. By comparing the current situation of two communities at different stages of development, this paper tries to find a universal path to adjust the relationship between security and owners in community governance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D631.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐曉軍;城市社區(qū)自治:權(quán)力矛盾及其協(xié)調(diào)——以武漢市X社區(qū)為個案[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2005年01期

2 徐勇;論城市社區(qū)建設(shè)中的社區(qū)居民自治[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

3 張立榮,李莉;當(dāng)代中國城市社區(qū)組織管理體制:模式分析與改革探索[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

4 陳偉東;政府與社區(qū):共生、互補(bǔ)、雙贏——以武漢市江漢區(qū)創(chuàng)新社區(qū)治安運(yùn)作體系的實(shí)驗(yàn)為例[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

5 費(fèi)孝通;中國現(xiàn)代化:對城市社區(qū)建設(shè)的再思考[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2001年01期

6 馮曉英;北京城市社區(qū)管理創(chuàng)新的調(diào)研與思考[J];前線;2001年03期

7 馮玲,李志遠(yuǎn);中國城市社區(qū)治理結(jié)構(gòu)變遷的過程分析——基于資源配置視角[J];人文雜志;2003年01期

8 金竹心;社區(qū)建設(shè)的能力、作用和策略[J];社會;2000年09期

9 張亮;上海社區(qū)建設(shè)面臨困境:居民參與不足[J];社會;2001年01期

10 石發(fā)勇;城市社區(qū)民主建設(shè)與制度性約束 上海市居委會改革個案研究[J];社會;2005年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 馬仲良;[N];北京日報(bào);2001年

本文編號：1606648