本文選題：勞動教養(yǎng)　切入點：制度　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2003年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 勞動教養(yǎng)制度自1955年產(chǎn)生以來，在預(yù)防違法犯罪和社會治安綜合治理方面發(fā)揮了積極的作用。但是，隨著我國依法治國進程的推進和社會法制觀念的日益增強，特別是公民人權(quán)意識的覺醒，勞動教養(yǎng)制度存在的弊端日益顯露。對勞動教養(yǎng)制度進行改革已勢在必行。 第一章：勞動教養(yǎng)制度的歷史沿革 概述了勞動教養(yǎng)制度創(chuàng)建、發(fā)展的歷史進程及勞動教養(yǎng)制度取得的歷史成就。 第二章：勞動教養(yǎng)制度的主要問題和缺陷 剖析、反思了勞動教養(yǎng)制度存在的問題和缺陷，主要表現(xiàn)在六個方面：一是勞動教養(yǎng)的性質(zhì)不確定；二是勞動教養(yǎng)制度法出多門，效力不一，體系龐雜，執(zhí)法隨意性大；三是缺乏有效的監(jiān)督制約和救濟機制及程序規(guī)定；四是勞動教養(yǎng)的期限規(guī)定太長；五是勞動教養(yǎng)適用范圍太窄，不利于打擊違法犯罪行為；六是勞動教養(yǎng)的合法性、合理性、正當(dāng)性存在危機。 第三章：勞動教養(yǎng)制度與保安處分之比較 簡要介紹國外的保安處分制度，并與中國的勞動教養(yǎng)制度進行了比較。 第四章：勞動教養(yǎng)制度之重構(gòu) 概述了目前勞動教養(yǎng)制度改革中的幾種設(shè)想，主要有兩大模式、四種方案，即：行政模式和刑事模式，行政模式又有勞動教養(yǎng)司法化和行政處罰化兩種方案，刑事模式中有保安處分化和刑罰化兩種方案。在對勞動教養(yǎng)制度的各種改革方案進行分析評價后，提出對勞動教養(yǎng)制度的重構(gòu)方案。 結(jié)論：勞動教養(yǎng)制度的改革必須以中國刑事法律制度和行政法律制度的全面改革為前提，在廢除現(xiàn)有勞動教養(yǎng)制度的基礎(chǔ)上，對現(xiàn)有的行政、治安、刑罰措施的范圍進行重新界定，根據(jù)現(xiàn)有勞動教養(yǎng)對象行為的罪錯性質(zhì)分別納入以上三種措施之中，還應(yīng)根據(jù)中國的具體情況建立中國式的保安處分制度。
[Abstract]:Since its birth in 1955, the system of re-education through labor has played an active role in the prevention of illegal crimes and the comprehensive management of public security. However, with the advancement of the process of administering the country according to law and the strengthening of the concept of social legal system, Especially with the awakening of citizen's consciousness of human rights, the malpractice of reeducation through labor system is becoming more and more obvious, so it is imperative to reform the system of reeducation through labor. Chapter one: the Historical Evolution of the system of Reeducation through Labor. This paper summarizes the historical process of the establishment and development of the system of reeducation through labor and the historical achievements of the system of reeducation through labor. Chapter two: the main problems and defects of the system of Reeducation through Labor. This paper analyzes and reflects on the problems and defects in the system of re-education through labor, which are mainly manifested in six aspects: first, the nature of reeducation through labour is uncertain; Third, lack of effective supervision, restriction, relief mechanism and procedural provisions; fourth, too long time limit for re-education through labor; fifth, too narrow scope of application of re-education through labor, which is not conducive to cracking down on illegal and criminal acts; and sixth, legality and rationality of re-education through labour. There is a crisis in legitimacy. Chapter three: the comparison between the system of Reeducation through Labor and Security measures. This paper briefly introduces the system of security measures in foreign countries and compares it with the system of reeducation through labor in China. Chapter 4th: the Reconstruction of Reeducation through Labor system. This paper summarizes several tentative ideas in the reform of re-education through labor system at present. There are mainly two major models, four schemes, namely, administrative mode and criminal mode, and administrative mode has two kinds of schemes, that is, judicial reeducation through labor and administrative punishment. There are two kinds of schemes in the criminal model: the division of the security department and the punishment. After analyzing and evaluating the various reform schemes of the re-education through labor system, the author puts forward the reconstruction scheme of the re-education through labor system. Conclusion: the reform of the re-education through labor system must be based on the comprehensive reform of the criminal law system and the administrative legal system in China, and on the basis of abolishing the existing system of re-education through labour, the existing administration and public security should be improved. The scope of penalty measures should be redefined according to the nature of the crime and error of the existing reeducation through labor act respectively into the above three measures and the system of security measures of Chinese style should be established according to the specific conditions of China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：D926.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 皮純協(xié),王毅;試論勞動教養(yǎng)制度的改革與完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2000年03期

2 劉仁文;勞動教養(yǎng)亟需立法[J];法學(xué)雜志;1998年05期

3 魏曉鵬;對勞動教養(yǎng)工作的調(diào)查[J];法學(xué)雜志;1998年06期

4 劉健,賴建云;論我國勞動教養(yǎng)制度與國際人權(quán)公約的沖突及其調(diào)整——對免于強迫勞動權(quán)的剖析[J];法學(xué)評論;2001年05期

5 張心泉;我國勞動教養(yǎng)制度的評價及其走向展望[J];法學(xué);2000年08期

6 張紹彥;關(guān)于勞動教養(yǎng)立法的基礎(chǔ)問題思考[J];法學(xué);2001年03期

7 陳瑞華;警察權(quán)的司法控制——以勞動教養(yǎng)為范例的分析[J];法學(xué);2001年06期

8 沈福俊;關(guān)于廢除勞動教養(yǎng)制度的思考[J];法學(xué);1999年07期

9 宋海鷹,宋雁;保安處分制度與刑法中的人權(quán)保障機制——兼談我國勞動教養(yǎng)制度的立法改革[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年01期

10 趙文艷;論勞動教養(yǎng)的現(xiàn)狀及其立法走向[J];河北法學(xué);2002年02期

，

本文編號：1603395