發(fā)布時間：2018-03-12 12:41

  本文選題：“禁摩”　切入點：政策制定　出處：《中南民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國改革開放近20年來的經(jīng)濟高速發(fā)展，摩托車、私家車等機動車增長迅猛，在城市中保有量的大幅增加。摩托車已經(jīng)成為市民出行不可缺少的交通工具，截至2010年為止，我國擁有1.2億臺保有量的摩托車，在如此大巨大保有量的壓力之下，對相關(guān)職能部門在如何管理摩托車問題上提出了嚴峻的挑戰(zhàn)。為此，各地方政府為了緩解城市的交通壓力、維護道路交通的秩序、降低尾氣排放對環(huán)境污染、打擊“兩搶一盜”的犯罪行為以及提升城市的形象，制定了相關(guān)“禁摩”的公共政策、地方性法規(guī)文件等；如限制或者禁止摩托車的上牌登記，限制或者是禁止摩托車在規(guī)定區(qū)域或是整個市區(qū)道路的通行。由于各個地方“禁摩”政策的推行，加上公共交通基礎(chǔ)不完善，對市民出行造成了極大的不便利，因而引起了社會的高度關(guān)注，甚至引起了公訴風波。 本文采用的是理論分析和實證分析兩種研究方法，以公共政策制定的相關(guān)原則來論證“禁摩”之缺乏法律依據(jù)，并違背公共政策制定的相關(guān)原則。以公共政策執(zhí)行的相關(guān)原理來說明“禁摩”政策執(zhí)行中出現(xiàn)的偏差，并探討了政策執(zhí)行偏差的原因及解決的辦法。本文共計四個部分，第一部分介紹我國城市目前“禁摩”的相關(guān)情況；“禁摩”的時間、手段、是否達到預(yù)期目的等。第二部分是從公共政策規(guī)劃的三項基本原則（信息完備原則、公平公正原則、現(xiàn)實可行性原則），以及公共政策合法化的角度來分析“禁摩”政策的不合理性。第三部分是借鑒境外對摩托車的管理以及相關(guān)措施，提高交通安全意識，提出規(guī)劃摩托車專用通道及建設(shè)摩托車基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施等相關(guān)措施，，來完善摩托車的管理。最后一個部分是提出城市交通管理的政策建議，如控制私人汽車的發(fā)展，以建立軌道交通與快速交通為核心，常規(guī)交通為主體，摩托車和自行車補充城市交通的盲點，通過路面總量的控制來解決城市交通的擁擠問題。
[Abstract]:With the rapid economic development of China's reform and opening up in the past 20 years, motorcycles, private cars, and other motor vehicles have grown rapidly, and the number of motor vehicles in cities has increased substantially. Motorcycles have become an indispensable means of transportation for citizens. Up to 2010, China has 120 million motorcycles in possession. Under the pressure of such a huge amount of ownership, it poses a serious challenge to the relevant functional departments on how to manage motorcycles. Therefore, in order to alleviate the traffic pressure in the city, local governments, To maintain the order of road traffic, reduce the exhaust gas pollution to the environment, crack down on the crime of "two robberies and one theft" and promote the image of the city, and formulate the public policies and local laws and regulations related to "forbidding friction" and so on; For example, restricting or prohibiting the registration of motorcycles, restricting or prohibiting the passage of motorcycles in prescribed areas or on roads throughout the urban area. As a result of the implementation of the "No friction" policy in various localities and the imperfect public transport infrastructure, It causes great inconveniences to citizens' travel, and thus causes great concern to the society and even arouses the storm of public prosecution. This paper uses two research methods, theoretical analysis and empirical analysis, to demonstrate the lack of legal basis for "prohibition of friction" with the relevant principles of public policy formulation. It also disobeys the relevant principles of public policy formulation, explains the deviation in the implementation of "forbidding friction" policy with the relevant principles of public policy implementation, and probes into the reasons for the deviation in policy implementation and the ways to solve it. There are four parts in this paper. The first part introduces the current situation of "forbidden friction" in Chinese cities, the time, means, whether or not to achieve the expected purpose, etc. The second part is based on the three basic principles of public policy planning (the principle of complete information, the principle of fairness and justice, etc.). The practical feasibility principle and the angle of public policy legalization are used to analyze the irrationality of the "forbidden friction" policy. The third part is to learn from the overseas management of motorcycles and related measures to raise the awareness of traffic safety. To improve the management of motorcycles by planning special lanes for motorcycles and building motorcycle infrastructure, the last part is to put forward policy recommendations for urban traffic management, such as controlling the development of private cars. With the establishment of rail transit and rapid transit as the core, conventional traffic as the main body, motorcycles and bicycles supplement the blind spot of urban traffic, the problem of urban traffic congestion can be solved by controlling the total amount of road surface.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D631.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹敏暉;;城市交通存在的問題及對策分析[J];重慶交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

2 仇保興;;加強落實城市公共交通優(yōu)先發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略[J];城市交通;2006年01期

3 何華兵;;中國公共政策的公眾議程設(shè)置模式的探討[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年01期

4 張德瑞;;行政法的平等原則與行政機關(guān)的選擇性執(zhí)法[J];河南社會科學(xué);2007年06期

5 王丹丹;;淺談中小城市公共交通優(yōu)先發(fā)展——以漢中為例[J];市場論壇;2011年06期

6 耿國階;;公共政策制定主體的復(fù)雜性分析[J];理論探索;2007年01期

7 郭峗;劉高林;;“禁摩令”引發(fā)的法律思考[J];嶺南學(xué)刊;2007年03期

8 樓國強;游說競爭、信息披露與公共政策的走向[J];南開經(jīng)濟研究;2005年04期

9 楊炳超;論美國憲法的正當程序原則——兼論我國對該原則的借鑒[J];法學(xué)論壇;2004年06期

10 涂四溢;;《政府信息公開條例》的價值缺陷[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2010年01期

本文編號：1601614