發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-04 21:39

  本文選題：政府分類支出　切入點(diǎn)：居民消費(fèi)　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：改革開(kāi)放以來(lái),尤其近十年中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)生了平均10%的增長(zhǎng),也伴隨著居民消費(fèi)占國(guó)民生產(chǎn)總值的比重在不斷下降,各省區(qū)市的經(jīng)濟(jì)也表現(xiàn)出了快速增長(zhǎng),區(qū)域差異也相繼出現(xiàn),在地里空間上表現(xiàn)出了相關(guān)性或差異性。2008年受全球經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)的影響,過(guò)去在中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)拉動(dòng)中發(fā)揮重要作用的出口和民間投資已經(jīng)明顯銳減,消費(fèi)需求增長(zhǎng)乏力。同時(shí),2013年各地區(qū)的環(huán)境惡化,不僅影響居民生活水平的提高,而且考驗(yàn)著我國(guó)政府支出對(duì)全局的考量。擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需,促進(jìn)居民消費(fèi)來(lái)拉動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)是主力,近年來(lái)我國(guó)政府支出也不斷在增加,在基本建設(shè)、民生工程和行政管理支出上加大了投入力度,這樣就可以改善投資環(huán)境、消費(fèi)環(huán)境和生活環(huán)境,使得私人消費(fèi)和居民消費(fèi)增加,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)。本文試圖通過(guò)對(duì)政府財(cái)政支出發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀做深入分析,采用理論和實(shí)證研究分析中國(guó)政府支出對(duì)居民消費(fèi)是怎樣影響的,這對(duì)我國(guó)財(cái)政政策具有很好的意義,同時(shí)也對(duì)刺激我國(guó)居民消費(fèi)和提高居民生活質(zhì)量具有實(shí)際意義。 本文利用非線性有效消費(fèi)函數(shù)建立消費(fèi)效用最優(yōu)模型,通過(guò)理論模型的分析得到政府的三類支出與代表性消費(fèi)者的關(guān)系參數(shù),將會(huì)對(duì)居民消費(fèi)產(chǎn)生一定的影響。三類支出參數(shù)的動(dòng)態(tài)變化會(huì)對(duì)消費(fèi)產(chǎn)生抑制或促進(jìn)作用,以及這三個(gè)參數(shù)的變化也表明了如何才能使政府支出規(guī)模達(dá)到一種最優(yōu)狀態(tài)。同時(shí)在實(shí)證分析上,采用對(duì)數(shù)模型和SVAR模型,加入產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和對(duì)外負(fù)債的因素來(lái)分析對(duì)消費(fèi)的動(dòng)態(tài)效應(yīng)。首先,經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析得到政府基本建設(shè)支出對(duì)居民消費(fèi)有一定擠出效應(yīng)；民生支出對(duì)居民消費(fèi)有促進(jìn)作用,通過(guò)脈沖效應(yīng)分析,在短期內(nèi)民生支出規(guī)模的效應(yīng)不太明顯；行政經(jīng)費(fèi)支出對(duì)居民消費(fèi)在一定時(shí)期里有擠出作用；產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整升級(jí)對(duì)消費(fèi)有一定的正效應(yīng)；還有對(duì)外負(fù)債在一定時(shí)期中對(duì)居民消費(fèi)有一定的負(fù)效應(yīng)。接著采用了空間面板數(shù)據(jù)來(lái)自31個(gè)省份的人均數(shù)據(jù),樣本數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)間是從1997年到2010年,空間滯后模型(SAR模型)和空間誤差模型(SEM模型)都采用了極大似然法估計(jì),都分別用了地區(qū)固定效應(yīng)、時(shí)間固定效應(yīng)和地區(qū)時(shí)間效應(yīng)估計(jì)地理加權(quán)矩陣的空間面板數(shù)據(jù)模型。SAR模型中的空間滯后項(xiàng)、解釋變量人均收入、基本建設(shè)支出、民生支出和行政管理支出系數(shù)都顯著,表明在人均收入和政府分類支出對(duì)居民消費(fèi)的影響下,居民消費(fèi)支出存在著顯著的空間相關(guān)性,空間滯后項(xiàng)系數(shù)為負(fù)。SEM模型中的空間誤差項(xiàng)、解釋變量人均收入、基本建設(shè)支出、民生支出和行政管理支出系數(shù)都顯著,表明居民消費(fèi)支出不僅受到了人均收入和政府分類支出的影響,而且受到相鄰省份的解釋變量人均收入、基本建設(shè)支出、民生支出和行政管理支出的影響和空間相鄰的不可觀測(cè)因素的影響。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of reform and opening up, China's economy has grown by an average of 10% in the past decade, and along with the decline in the proportion of residents' consumption to the gross national product, the economy of various provinces, districts, and cities has also shown rapid growth, and regional differences have also appeared one after another. In 2008, under the influence of the global economic crisis, exports and private investment, which used to play an important role in stimulating the Chinese economy, have been significantly reduced. At the same time, in 2013, the deterioration of the environment in various regions not only affected the improvement of residents' living standards, but also tested the overall consideration of our government expenditure. Expanding domestic demand and promoting residents' consumption to stimulate economic growth is the main force. In recent years, our government expenditure has also been continuously increasing. We have increased investment in capital construction, people's livelihood projects, and administrative management spending, so that we can improve the investment environment, the consumption environment and the living environment. This paper attempts to make a deep analysis of the current situation of the development of government fiscal expenditure, and use theoretical and empirical research to analyze how Chinese government expenditure affects residents' consumption. This is of great significance to our country's fiscal policy, but also to stimulating our country's residents' consumption and improving the residents' quality of life. In this paper, the nonlinear efficient consumption function is used to establish the optimal model of consumption utility. Through the analysis of the theoretical model, the relationship parameters between the three types of government expenditure and the representative consumers are obtained. The dynamic changes of three kinds of expenditure parameters will inhibit or promote consumption. And the change of these three parameters also shows how to make the scale of government expenditure reach an optimal state. At the same time, the logarithmic model and SVAR model are used in the empirical analysis. First of all, the empirical analysis shows that government capital construction expenditure has a certain crowding out effect on residents' consumption; people's livelihood expenditure can promote residents' consumption. Through the pulse effect analysis, the scale effect of the people's livelihood expenditure is not obvious in the short term, the administrative expenditure has the extrusion function to the resident consumption in a certain period, the industrial structure adjustment and upgrading has the certain positive effect to the consumption; There are also external liabilities that have a certain negative effect on residents' consumption in a certain period of time. Then we use spatial panel data from 31 provinces' data per capita. The sample data period is from 1997 to 2010. The spatial lag model (SAR model) and the spatial error model (SEM model) are both estimated by maximum likelihood method. Time fixed effect and region time effect estimate Spatial Panel data Model of Geographic weighting Matrix. Spatial lag in SAR model, explain variable per capita income, capital expenditure, people's livelihood expenditure and administrative expenditure coefficient are significant. It shows that under the influence of per capita income and government classified expenditure on residents' consumption, there is a significant spatial correlation between residents' consumption expenditure, and the coefficient of spatial lag is negative. SEM model is the spatial error term, which explains the variable per capita income. Capital construction expenditure, people's livelihood expenditure and administrative expenditure coefficient are significant, indicating that residents' consumption expenditure is not only affected by per capita income and government classified expenditure, but also by the explanatory variables of neighboring provinces, such as per capita income, capital construction expenditure, etc. The influence of people's livelihood expenditure and administrative expenditure and the unobservable factors adjacent to each other.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F126.1;F812.45

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李樹(shù)培;白戰(zhàn)偉;;改革開(kāi)放三十年政府支出與居民消費(fèi)關(guān)系的動(dòng)態(tài)演變——基于時(shí)變參數(shù)模型的考察[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2009年09期

2 李真男;;政府支出結(jié)構(gòu)與稅收分配比例的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效應(yīng)研究——財(cái)政分權(quán)體制下政府最大化社會(huì)福利機(jī)制推演[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2009年09期

3 李春琦;唐哲一;;財(cái)政支出結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)對(duì)私人消費(fèi)影響的動(dòng)態(tài)分析——生命周期視角下政府支出結(jié)構(gòu)需要調(diào)整的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2010年06期

4 李建強(qiáng);;政府民生支出對(duì)居民消費(fèi)需求的動(dòng)態(tài)影響——基于狀態(tài)空間模型的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2010年06期

5 王海軍;劉又哲;謝冬水;;遼寧省財(cái)政支出對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響——基于空間計(jì)量模型的實(shí)證分析[J];地方財(cái)政研究;2011年07期

6 鹿庚;;如何發(fā)揮當(dāng)前積極財(cái)政政策的效用——我國(guó)財(cái)政支出結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化的實(shí)證研究[J];發(fā)展研究;2010年02期

7 袁芳英;;政府支出對(duì)居民消費(fèi)的影響——對(duì)Barro-Ricardo等價(jià)之謎的中國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年01期

8 李永友;;公共服務(wù)型政府建設(shè)與財(cái)政支出結(jié)構(gòu)效率[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2011年01期

9 劉溶滄,馬拴友;赤字、國(guó)債與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的實(shí)證分析——兼評(píng)積極財(cái)政政策是否有擠出效應(yīng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2001年02期

10 王青;張峁;;地方政府支出對(duì)居民消費(fèi)影響的空間計(jì)量分析——遼寧省為例[J];山東經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 朱紅;我國(guó)政府消費(fèi)規(guī)模對(duì)居民消費(fèi)需求的影響[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1567462