發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-07 07:52

  本文選題：農(nóng)民　切入點(diǎn)：收入差距　出處：《云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文以云南省為例,基于云南省歷年統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒的各市、各州以及縣級數(shù)據(jù),采用基尼系數(shù)和加權(quán)變異系數(shù)法度量了云南省內(nèi)部和按方位劃分的滇東、滇中、滇西三個(gè)地區(qū)縣域農(nóng)民內(nèi)部的收入差距。主要描述了三個(gè)地區(qū)之間的收入差距狀況,并詳細(xì)研究分析了造成這種收入差距的主要影響因素。得到的研究結(jié)論具有十分重要的理論意義和實(shí)際指導(dǎo)意義。其不僅可以幫助我們理解對西部地區(qū)農(nóng)村收入差距的成因,也能夠?yàn)槲髂系貐^(qū)政府制定農(nóng)村的扶貧政策提供切實(shí)的措施建議。本文的主要結(jié)論是:在2007年至2013年這七年間,收入差距最大的是2009年和2010年,基尼系數(shù)分別為0.3118和0.3110。在收入差距方面,本文采用多亞組基尼系數(shù)分解方法對2010年的不平等指數(shù)進(jìn)行了分解,分解結(jié)果表明:農(nóng)民收入差距主要來自各地區(qū)內(nèi)部差距,也就是各地區(qū)內(nèi)部資源存在稟賦差異,其對總體貢獻(xiàn)率為86.24%,其中滇中地區(qū)內(nèi)部收入差距對總體收入差距的貢獻(xiàn)率為33.34%,但是滇東和滇西的基尼系數(shù)最高,均超過0.5。組間差距即三個(gè)地區(qū)之間的收入差距對總體差距的貢獻(xiàn)率為13.76%。并且從人力資本、物質(zhì)資本、自然資源、生產(chǎn)資本和社會(huì)性負(fù)擔(dān)五個(gè)方面考察影響收入差距的主要因素,發(fā)現(xiàn)人均國有經(jīng)濟(jì)固定資產(chǎn)投資額、勞動(dòng)力受教育程度與收入不平等程度呈負(fù)相關(guān),烤煙播種面積與收入不平等程度呈正相關(guān),水和電這兩項(xiàng)最基本的農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)需求也能引起各地區(qū)間農(nóng)民收入的差異。另外,本文還通過按照收入和支出的來源分解不平等指數(shù)發(fā)現(xiàn),家庭經(jīng)營性收入是農(nóng)村住戶的收入的主要來源,也是引起農(nóng)民收入不平等的主要原因,而家庭生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營主要的收入是農(nóng)業(yè)收入,即農(nóng)業(yè)收入造成的差異是云南省農(nóng)村地區(qū)收入不平等差異的主要因素。在各項(xiàng)支出當(dāng)中,生活消費(fèi)支出占總支出比例最高可達(dá)61.36%,對不平等局面的貢獻(xiàn)率為54.11%,也是最高的。其中的食品消費(fèi)支出占比高達(dá)29.38%,說明滿足生活基本需求仍是目前大多數(shù)農(nóng)民的首要抉擇。針對云南省縣域間農(nóng)民收入差距現(xiàn)象,本文提出了以下政策建議:在收入分配的政策上,可通過提高滇東與滇西地區(qū)各市(州)內(nèi)部中、低收入人口社會(huì)保障收入的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)降低滇東與滇西地區(qū)的收入差距。盡快地實(shí)現(xiàn)各項(xiàng)社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)的全國統(tǒng)籌,只有這樣,才能將部分的高收入人口的社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)繳費(fèi)轉(zhuǎn)移給低收入人口。政府應(yīng)加大轉(zhuǎn)移支付力度,要因地制宜,有區(qū)別的承擔(dān)貧窮落后、收入差距大的地區(qū)財(cái)政投入。云南省政府應(yīng)大幅增加對縣域間農(nóng)民教育投資,普遍提高農(nóng)民素質(zhì)。扶持當(dāng)?shù)剜l(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)的企業(yè),提高技術(shù)含量,擴(kuò)大企業(yè)的生產(chǎn)規(guī)模,以吸取更多的農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)力,帶來非農(nóng)業(yè)收入。政府應(yīng)切實(shí)減輕農(nóng)民壓力,完善農(nóng)村居民征稅收稅的制度。
[Abstract]:Taking Yunnan Province as an example, based on the data of the cities, states and counties of Yunnan Province over the years, the Gini coefficient and weighted coefficient of variation are used to measure the internal and azimuth of Yunnan and the middle of Yunnan. The income gap among farmers in three counties in western Yunnan. The paper mainly describes the situation of income gap among the three regions. The conclusions are of great theoretical and practical significance. It can not only help us understand the causes of the rural income gap in the western region, but also help us understand the causes of the income gap in the western region. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: in the seven years from 2007 to 2013, the income gap is the largest in 2009 and 2009. The Gini coefficient is 0.3118 and 0.3110 respectively. In terms of income gap, this paper uses the multi-subgroup Gini coefficient decomposition method to decompose the inequality index in 2010. The results show that the income gap of farmers mainly comes from the internal disparity in different regions. In other words, there are differences in the endowment of resources in different regions, and the contribution rate to the total income gap is 86.24, in which the contribution rate of the internal income gap to the total income gap in the central Yunnan region is 33.34, but the Gini coefficient is the highest in the east and west of Yunnan. The contribution rate of the income gap between the three regions to the overall gap is 13.76%. The main factors affecting the income gap are analyzed from five aspects: human capital, material capital, natural resources, production capital and social burden. It was found that there was a negative correlation between the investment in fixed assets per capita, the education level of labor force and the income inequality, while the planting area of flue-cured tobacco was positively correlated with the income inequality. The two most basic agricultural production needs, water and electricity, can also lead to differences in farmers' incomes across regions. In addition, the paper finds that the inequality index is broken down by sources of income and expenditure. Household operating income is the main source of income for rural households and the main cause of income inequality among farmers. The main income of household production and operation is agricultural income. That is, the difference caused by agricultural income is the main factor of income inequality in rural areas of Yunnan Province. The highest proportion of living expenses to total expenditure can reach 61.36 percent, and the contribution rate to inequality is 54.11, which is also the highest. The proportion of food consumption expenditure is as high as 29.38 percent, which shows that meeting the basic needs of living is still the first of most farmers at present. To solve the problem of peasants' income gap among counties in Yunnan Province, This paper puts forward the following policy suggestions: in terms of income distribution policy, it can be improved in the cities (prefectures) of eastern and western Yunnan regions. The way of social security income of low-income population is to reduce the income gap between eastern Yunnan and western Yunnan. As soon as possible, we can realize the overall plan of all kinds of social insurance as soon as possible. Only in this way, In order to transfer the social insurance contributions of some of the high-income population to the low-income population. The government should increase the transfer payments, take measures according to local conditions, and undertake poverty and backwardness in a differentiated manner. The Yunnan Provincial Government should substantially increase the investment in the education of farmers among counties, improve the quality of farmers in general, support local township enterprises, increase the technological content, and expand the scale of production of enterprises. In order to absorb more rural labor force and bring non-agricultural income, the government should lighten the pressure of farmers and improve the system of taxation and taxation of rural residents.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F323.8

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱新方;轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期農(nóng)民收入差距的成因及對策思考[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2004年03期

2 唐芳;蔡志;;東中西部地區(qū)農(nóng)民收入差距分析[J];商丘職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

3 何玉霞;;轉(zhuǎn)型期農(nóng)民收入差距原因探源[J];萊陽農(nóng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

4 包宗順;金高峰;;江蘇農(nóng)民收入差距新特征及增收對策[J];農(nóng)業(yè)現(xiàn)代化研究;2007年03期

5 黃繼煒;;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)與農(nóng)民收入差距問題[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年07期

6 高瑞瑞;;農(nóng)民收入差距分析與思考[J];中國證券期貨;2011年06期

7 翟彬;童海濱;;我國東、中、西部地區(qū)農(nóng)民收入差距的實(shí)證研究——基于收入來源視角的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2012年08期

8 徐受琛;郭作北;;改革十年農(nóng)民收入差距的剖析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;1990年03期

9 楊啟地;改革開放以來我國農(nóng)民收入差距的統(tǒng)計(jì)實(shí)證分析[J];綿陽經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);1996年02期

10 楊啟地;改革開放以來我國農(nóng)民收入差距的測度與分析[J];農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);1997年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 李朝林;;從農(nóng)民收入差距看我國農(nóng)村貧困[A];全國高等財(cái)經(jīng)院校《資本論》研究會(huì)2008年第25屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前9條

1 王月金;城鄉(xiāng)一體化破解農(nóng)民收入差距[N];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2012年

2 張曉輝 武志剛;農(nóng)民收入差距已上警界線[N];中國財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2001年

3 徐菁;湖北農(nóng)民收入差距繼續(xù)拉大[N];湖北日報(bào);2004年

4 紫瑯;貧富農(nóng)民收入差距大在哪？[N];宜興日報(bào);2006年

5 記者 趙新顏 喬茜雅;市民與農(nóng)民收入差距大幅縮小[N];新鄉(xiāng)日報(bào);2012年

6 記者 譚晶純 季征;城鎮(zhèn)：重點(diǎn)向中低收入群體傾斜 農(nóng)村：縮小與全國農(nóng)民收入差距[N];云南日報(bào);2011年

7 高曉曉　胡立剛;浙江助農(nóng)增收服務(wù)到田頭[N];農(nóng)民日報(bào);2010年

8 記者 劉玉珊;扎實(shí)推進(jìn)社會(huì)主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)[N];平頂山日報(bào);2006年

9 通訊員 鐘茂富　劉耀寶;武平開展“助農(nóng)增收送服務(wù)”活動(dòng)[N];閩西日報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 賀琨;中國農(nóng)村金融發(fā)展水平對農(nóng)民收入差距的影響研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2015年

2 謝玲玲;云南省農(nóng)民收入差距的度量與分解[D];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

3 邊策;河北省農(nóng)民收入差距及其變化實(shí)證分析[D];河北大學(xué);2008年

4 鄭曉智;云南省農(nóng)民收入差距的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[D];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

5 王汝印;濟(jì)寧市縣域農(nóng)民收入差距問題的分析研究[D];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

6 吳學(xué)榕;地區(qū)差距及戶間差距[D];浙江大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1578544