本文選題：基金會(huì)　切入點(diǎn)：內(nèi)部治理　出處：《東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：公信力是基金會(huì)的重要聲譽(yù)支撐,近年來由于一系列的慈善丑聞事件嚴(yán)重的影響了基金會(huì)的聲譽(yù),對(duì)基金會(huì)的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了影響,人們也對(duì)基金會(huì)的信任日益下降,同時(shí)對(duì)基金會(huì)透明度的關(guān)注不斷高漲,所以從提高基金會(huì)透明度的角度來提升公信力迫在眉睫,從法律法規(guī)的建設(shè)上來講,《基金會(huì)信息管理?xiàng)l例》,《基金會(huì)信息公布辦法》等法規(guī)已從法律方面對(duì)基金會(huì)信息披露做出了相應(yīng)的要求,從基金會(huì)的內(nèi)部自身環(huán)境來看,基金會(huì)內(nèi)部治理的好壞對(duì)基金會(huì)信息透明度水平有著密切的影響,因?yàn)橥晟频膬?nèi)部治理可以幫助基金會(huì)有效的監(jiān)督和制約經(jīng)營者,保護(hù)包括捐贈(zèng)者,受贈(zèng)者,社會(huì)群眾在內(nèi)的利益相關(guān)者的利益不受侵害,從而提高組織信息的透明度。所以本文試從基金會(huì)內(nèi)部治理角度探求其對(duì)基金會(huì)信息透明度的影響。 基金會(huì)中心網(wǎng)自2012年8月開始,依據(jù)公開,科學(xué),民間,發(fā)展,國際性等原則,向840位基金會(huì)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人和290多位企業(yè)、國際機(jī)構(gòu)、學(xué)術(shù)專家、意見領(lǐng)袖等組成的公眾代表開放了中基透明指數(shù)FTI平臺(tái),該透明指數(shù)體系包括基金會(huì)的基本信息、財(cái)務(wù)信息、項(xiàng)目信息、捐贈(zèng)信息等共60項(xiàng),滿分為129.4分,這個(gè)指數(shù)能夠幫助基金會(huì)根據(jù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)增強(qiáng)自身透明度,并了解自己的信息公開程度在行業(yè)內(nèi)的位置,也可以幫助公眾以透明指數(shù)作為捐贈(zèng)參考,從而促進(jìn)慈善行業(yè)增強(qiáng)透明度和公信力。本文依據(jù)該中心發(fā)布的中基透明指數(shù)FTI為依據(jù),運(yùn)用分類隨機(jī)抽樣方法隨機(jī)選取了98家基金會(huì)作為樣本,通過相關(guān)性分析和多元回歸分析檢驗(yàn),對(duì)文章提出的各假設(shè)以及相關(guān)控制變量都得到驗(yàn)證,以此得出基金會(huì)內(nèi)部治理因素對(duì)基金會(huì)的信息透明度有著多方面的影響。 結(jié)合理論分析和實(shí)證研究的結(jié)果,本文最后從建立合理的內(nèi)部報(bào)酬激勵(lì)機(jī)制,擴(kuò)大利益相關(guān)者在監(jiān)事會(huì)中的比例以及發(fā)展整體治理理念等三方面提出了完善內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制的相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:Credibility is the foundation's important reputation support. In recent years, because of a series of charitable scandals, the foundation's reputation has been seriously affected, which has had an impact on the foundation's development, and people's trust in the foundation is declining day by day.At the same time, the concern about the transparency of the foundation is rising, so it is urgent to enhance the credibility of the foundation from the perspective of increasing the transparency of the foundation.In terms of the construction of laws and regulations, the regulations on Foundation Information Management and the measures for the publication of Foundation Information have made corresponding requirements for the disclosure of Foundation information from the legal aspect. From the perspective of the internal environment of the Foundation,The quality of the internal governance of the foundation has a close impact on the level of transparency of the foundation information, because a sound internal governance can help the foundation to effectively supervise and restrict the operators, protect including donors and grantees.The interests of stakeholders, including the masses, are not infringed, thus enhancing the transparency of organizational information.Therefore, this paper tries to explore its impact on the foundation information transparency from the perspective of foundation internal governance.Since August 2012, based on the principles of openness, science, civil society, development, and internationalism, the network of foundations has reached 840 Foundation leaders and more than 290 corporate, international institutions, academic experts, etc.Public representatives, including opinion leaders, have opened the FTI platform, which includes the foundation's basic information, financial information, project information, donation information, etc., with a full score of 129.4.This index can help the foundation to increase its transparency according to the criteria, and understand the extent of its information disclosure in the industry. It can also help the public to use the transparency index as a reference for donations.Thus promoting the charity industry to enhance transparency and credibility.According to the FTI published by the center, 98 foundations were randomly selected by the method of classified random sampling, and the correlation analysis and multivariate regression analysis were carried out.All the hypotheses and related control variables proposed in this paper are verified, and it is concluded that the internal governance factors of the foundation have many influences on the information transparency of the foundation.Combined with the theoretical analysis and empirical research results, this paper finally from the establishment of a reasonable internal reward incentive mechanism,Expanding the proportion of stakeholders in the board of supervisors and developing the concept of overall governance, this paper puts forward the relevant suggestions to improve the internal governance mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F235

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周芙蓉;戴小燕;姜章;;論慈善基金會(huì)的內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年06期

2 顏克高;薛錢偉;;非營利組織理事會(huì)治理與財(cái)務(wù)績效研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2013年10期

3 周詠梅;劉燕梅;田青;;基金會(huì)透明度及其評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建[J];東方論壇;2013年06期

4 蔡寧;江伶俐;;利益相關(guān)者視角的非營利組織信息披露研究[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2014年03期

5 孔玉生;王秀;;非營利性組織信息透明性影響因素分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2013年02期

6 官有垣;;非營利組織執(zhí)行長之治理——以臺(tái)灣社會(huì)福利相關(guān)基金會(huì)為例[J];中國第三部門研究;2011年02期

7 辛甜;社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)與慈善籌資——上海市慈善基金會(huì)個(gè)案研究[J];華東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

8 田凱;;中國非營利組織理事會(huì)制度的發(fā)展與運(yùn)作[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2009年02期

9 錢顏文;姚芳;孫林巖;;非營利組織治理及其治理結(jié)構(gòu)研究:一個(gè)對(duì)比的視角[J];科研管理;2006年02期

10 徐f^;葉民強(qiáng);;我國基金會(huì)內(nèi)部治理問題的博弈分析[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2009年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1697168