發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-23 14:37

  本文選題：耽美文學(xué) + 美學(xué)語(yǔ)法��； 參考：《中共福建省委黨校學(xué)報(bào)》2017年09期

【摘要】：耽美文學(xué)已經(jīng)成為我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)文學(xué)的重要類(lèi)型。毛尖教授指控其為資產(chǎn)階級(jí)二代的美學(xué)語(yǔ)法,這種指責(zé)把美學(xué)趣味和階級(jí)身份處理成簡(jiǎn)單機(jī)械的二元對(duì)應(yīng),單向的精英化的批判思維把復(fù)雜多元的網(wǎng)絡(luò)文藝簡(jiǎn)單化了,既缺乏社會(huì)學(xué)的實(shí)證,也缺乏美學(xué)的細(xì)膩;既無(wú)視了網(wǎng)絡(luò)文藝本身的復(fù)雜性,也無(wú)視了耽美小說(shuō)讀者的分化性。為批判而批判使她沒(méi)能發(fā)現(xiàn)耽美寫(xiě)作真正的問(wèn)題——太過(guò)平滑。網(wǎng)絡(luò)耽美小說(shuō)如果能夠在寫(xiě)作中制造歧義,更加積極地回應(yīng)現(xiàn)實(shí),換一種方式參與歷史,就完全有可能呈現(xiàn)出與毛尖教授的判斷截然不同的面貌。
[Abstract]:Danmei literature has become an important type of network literature in China. Professor Mao Jian accused him of being the second generation of bourgeois aesthetic grammar. This accusation treated aesthetic taste and class identity as a simple and mechanical dualistic correspondence, and one-way elite critical thinking simplified the complex and pluralistic network literature and art. It lacks both sociological evidence and aesthetic delicacy; it ignores the complexity of network literature and art itself, and ignores the differentiation of readers of Tanmei novels. Criticizing for critique made her fail to discover the real problem of Daime's writing-it was too smooth. If the novel can create ambiguity in writing, respond to reality more actively and participate in history in another way, it is quite possible to present a totally different face from Professor Mao Jian's judgment.
【作者單位】： 福建社會(huì)科學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I207.42
，

本文編號(hào)：1925198