發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-30 08:47

  本文選題：偏堡子文化 + 來(lái)源��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：偏堡子文化是東北地區(qū)下遼河流域新石器時(shí)代的一支考古學(xué)文化，它得名于遼寧省沈陽(yáng)市新民縣偏堡沙崗遺址的發(fā)現(xiàn)。就文化分期來(lái)看，偏堡子文化早期筒形罐以大口、深腹、平底為主要造型，口沿下方一段距離飾有兩周橫向附加細(xì)泥條堆紋；中期筒形罐口沿下方的附加細(xì)泥條堆紋上移趨勢(shì)明顯，并逐漸與口沿重合形成厚疊唇；發(fā)展到晚期筒形罐的腹部逐漸向鼓腹發(fā)展，，疊唇由中期的厚疊唇逐漸發(fā)展為疊唇下部外撇，到晚期疊唇最后完全與口沿平行，口沿外撇即侈口，口部與腹部有折沿趨勢(shì)。由此我們可以看出偏堡子文化是由遼中地區(qū)的偏堡子沙崗遺址發(fā)展而后逐漸向南發(fā)展到遼南地區(qū)。 偏堡子文化有著自身鮮明的文化特征和內(nèi)涵，通過(guò)吸收遼西地區(qū)南寶力皋吐墓地的一些文化因素，與遼西地區(qū)的小河沿文化也有著密切的關(guān)系，經(jīng)過(guò)一段時(shí)間的發(fā)展，逐漸在遼中地區(qū)完全形成了的自身的文化內(nèi)涵，而后在遼南地區(qū)達(dá)到了該文化的繁榮期。偏堡子文化的發(fā)現(xiàn)豐富和發(fā)展了東北地區(qū)的考古學(xué)文化，并且對(duì)周邊地區(qū)的考古學(xué)文化產(chǎn)生了深刻的影響。偏堡子文化對(duì)地處遼東半島南端的小珠山四期、五期文化也有著深遠(yuǎn)的影響。通過(guò)陸上及海上交流，偏堡子文化的影響范圍更遠(yuǎn)至朝鮮半島。本文通過(guò)系統(tǒng)的分析偏堡子文化的遺址材料，除包括命名該文化的偏堡子沙崗遺址外，還包括高臺(tái)山遺址、肇工街遺址、三堂遺址、瓦房店交流島哈皮地遺址。首先，通過(guò)分析典型遺址的遺物來(lái)總結(jié)歸納該文化的文化特征及內(nèi)涵，其次探討偏堡子文化的來(lái)源及其流向，最后，再結(jié)合周鄰地區(qū)的相關(guān)文化探討該文化與周邊文化的關(guān)系。使偏堡子文化系統(tǒng)全面的展現(xiàn)在人們面前。
[Abstract]:Bifuzi culture is an archaeological culture of the Neolithic period in the Lower Liaohe River Basin in Northeast China. It is named after the discovery of the Xianbao Shagang site in Xinmin County, Shenyang, Liaoning Province. As far as cultural stages are concerned, in the early stage of culture, the main shape of the cylindrical pot in the early period of the culture was the big mouth, deep belly and flat bottom, with two weeks of horizontal additional fine mud stripes along the lower part of the mouth. In the middle stage, the tip of the cylindrical tank is moving upward along the bottom of the additional fine mud stripe, and the thick lip is gradually formed by overlap with the mouth, and the abdomen of the cylindrical tank develops gradually towards the bulging abdomen in the late stage. In the later stage, the lip was completely parallel to the lip edge, and the lip along the outer lip was wasted, and the mouth and abdomen had a tendency to fold. The upper lip of the fold lip developed gradually from the middle stage of the thick lip to the lower part of the fold lip, and to the late stage, the lip was completely parallel to the lip. From this we can see that the culture of Qianbao Zi is developed from the Xianbaozi Shagang site in the central part of Liaoning and then gradually to the south of Liaoning Province. This culture has its own distinct cultural characteristics and connotations. By absorbing some cultural factors of the Nanbaoligaotu cemetery in western Liaoning, it has a close relationship with the culture along the Xiaohe River in the western part of Liaoning, and has developed over a period of time. Gradually formed in the central region of its own cultural connotation, and then in southern Liaoning reached the prosperity of the culture. The discovery of Qianbao Zi culture enriches and develops the archaeological culture in Northeast China and has a profound influence on the archeological culture in the surrounding areas. In the south of Liaodong Peninsula, the fourth period of Xiaozhu Mountain and the fifth period of culture also have a profound influence. Through land and sea exchanges, the impact of the culture as far as the Korean Peninsula. Based on the systematic analysis of the site materials of Qianbao Zi Culture, this paper includes not only the Bianbao Zigang site, but also the Gaotaishan site, Zhaogongjie site, Santang site, Wafangdian Exchange Island Hapiti site. First of all, by analyzing the relics of typical sites to summarize the cultural characteristics and connotation of the culture, and then to explore the source and direction of the sub-culture, and finally, combined with the related culture in the neighboring region to explore the relationship between the culture and the surrounding culture. So that the sub-cultural system in a comprehensive way in front of the people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：K878

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前5條

1 索秀芬;李少兵;;小河沿文化年代和源流[J];邊疆考古研究;2008年00期

2 趙賓福;;中朝鄰境地區(qū)的新石器文化比較研究[J];邊疆考古研究;2010年00期

3 李恭篤,高美璇;試論偏堡文化[J];北方文物;1998年02期

4 張翠敏;;論遼南地區(qū)偏堡類型因素[J];東北史地;2004年04期

5 趙賓福;杜戰(zhàn)偉;;新樂(lè)下層文化的分期與年代[J];文物;2011年03期

中國(guó)博士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前2條

1 楊占風(fēng);鴨綠江、圖們江及烏蘇里江流域的新石器文化研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

2 霍東峰;環(huán)渤海地區(qū)新石器時(shí)代考古學(xué)文化研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2085707