發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-24 18:46

  本文選題：森林旅游 + 森林公園�。� 參考：《海南師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：森林旅游作為一種極具特色的新興旅游,具有巨大的環(huán)境效益、經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和社會(huì)效益。森林旅游承載力研究是森林旅游開(kāi)發(fā)、規(guī)劃與管理的重要工具。森林公園是森林旅游事業(yè)發(fā)展最重要的陣地,已經(jīng)成為重要的旅游目的地之一。因此,正確地評(píng)價(jià)森林公園旅游承載力,對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展框架下的森林旅游高效運(yùn)營(yíng)和管理起著至關(guān)重要的作用,同時(shí)也為森林旅游資源開(kāi)發(fā)和環(huán)境保護(hù)提供決策依據(jù)。海南是我國(guó)重要熱帶地區(qū),熱帶森林資源豐富。海南森林旅游不僅在全國(guó)森林旅游體系中占有重要地位,同時(shí)還具有十分巨大的發(fā)展?jié)摿�。因�?開(kāi)展海南森林公園旅游承載力研究,對(duì)海南森林旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展具有至關(guān)重要的作用。本研究首先通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外森林旅游承載力研究相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理,歸納總結(jié)森林旅游承載力的相關(guān)概念、定義、構(gòu)成和評(píng)價(jià)方法;其次,基于森林旅游承載力評(píng)價(jià)相關(guān)理論,在海南選取1個(gè)國(guó)家級(jí)和1個(gè)市縣級(jí)森林公園為實(shí)證案例,具體為海南七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園和三亞亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園,結(jié)合實(shí)地踏勘和問(wèn)卷調(diào)查,測(cè)算并評(píng)價(jià)案例景區(qū)的旅游承載力;最后,結(jié)合理論研究與實(shí)證案例研究,從景區(qū)最大承載力提升方向和游客流量控制聯(lián)動(dòng)系統(tǒng)等方面,對(duì)海南森林公園資源空間承載力、經(jīng)濟(jì)承載力、社會(huì)承載力提出調(diào)控對(duì)策和建議。研究結(jié)果表明:(1)旅游資源空間承載力:根據(jù)七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園和亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園地形特點(diǎn)和布局模式,采用線狀模型對(duì)其空間承載力進(jìn)行測(cè)算,七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園瞬時(shí)資源空間承載力為2765人,日合理資源空間承載力為8295人;亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園瞬時(shí)資源空間承載力為10000人,日合理資源空間承載力為20000人。(2)旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)承載力:根據(jù)對(duì)游客進(jìn)行抽樣問(wèn)卷調(diào)查的結(jié)果,選取停車位和公共廁所數(shù)量對(duì)實(shí)證案例景區(qū)設(shè)施承載力進(jìn)行測(cè)評(píng),七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園停車場(chǎng)瞬時(shí)設(shè)施承載力為109輛,日合理設(shè)施承載力為6650人,公共廁所設(shè)施承載力為11475人和5100人,故其日合理經(jīng)濟(jì)承載力為5100人;亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園停車場(chǎng)瞬時(shí)設(shè)施承載力為284輛,日合理設(shè)施承載力為8746人,公共廁所設(shè)施承載力為54000人和24000人,故其日合理經(jīng)濟(jì)承載力為8746人。(3)旅游社會(huì)承載力:兩個(gè)案例景區(qū)均距市區(qū)較遠(yuǎn),景區(qū)附近居民點(diǎn)較少,森林公園旅游活動(dòng)也未對(duì)當(dāng)?shù)鼐用裆�活、工作產(chǎn)生不利影響,反而在一定程度上促進(jìn)了本地社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,本地居民對(duì)森林公園旅游活動(dòng)普遍肯定和歡迎,其居民心理承載力可視為無(wú)窮大。以視覺(jué)、聽(tīng)覺(jué)、觸覺(jué)和行動(dòng)感受四個(gè)方面的游客體驗(yàn)滿意程度作為評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo),以游客最為敏感的感受獲得權(quán)重。在此基礎(chǔ)上計(jì)算,得到七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園的瞬時(shí)游客心理承載力為1525人,日合理游客心理承載力為4575人,瞬時(shí)最適游客心理承載力為730人,日最適游客心理承載力為2190人。亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園的瞬時(shí)游客心理承載力為9721人,日合理游客心理承載力為19442人,瞬時(shí)最適游客心理承載力為1968人,日最適游客心理承載力為3936人。因此,七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園和亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園日合理社會(huì)承載力分別為4575人和19442人。(4)實(shí)證案例比較分析:從旅游空間承載力來(lái)看,七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園與亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園旅游空間承載量相差較大,主要是由于景區(qū)布局模式、游道線路布局及游覽線路方向上的不同造成。從旅游設(shè)施承載力來(lái)看,七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園明顯差于亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園,主要是受4A級(jí)景區(qū)評(píng)定時(shí)間影響較大,七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園開(kāi)發(fā)時(shí)間較晚,基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投入不足,其旅游設(shè)施承載力較差。目前,居民心理承載力尚未成為七仙嶺溫泉國(guó)家森林公園和亞龍灣熱帶天堂森林公園發(fā)展的限制性因素,而兩者游客心理承載力存在較大差異,特別是最適心理承載力差異較大,主要是由于兩個(gè)景區(qū)游客的出游方式有差異,在旅游目的、停留時(shí)間上也明顯不同,游客滿意程度差異較大。(5)對(duì)策與建議:針對(duì)2個(gè)實(shí)證案例的旅游承載力測(cè)算與比較分析,對(duì)于森林公園旅游承載力的調(diào)控,一方面,通過(guò)提升景區(qū)最大承載力,包括提高空間和設(shè)施承載量和提升居民與游客心理承載量;另一方面,建立游客流量控制聯(lián)動(dòng)系統(tǒng)調(diào)控,包括政府外部系統(tǒng)和景區(qū)內(nèi)部系統(tǒng)調(diào)控。
[Abstract]:Forest tourism, as a special kind of new tourism, has great environmental benefits, economic and social benefits. The study of forest tourism carrying capacity is an important tool for forest tourism development, planning and management. Forest Park is the most important position in the development of forest tourism and has become one of the important tourist destinations. The evaluation of the tourist capacity of Forest Park is very important for the efficient operation and management of Forest Tourism under the framework of sustainable development. It also provides a decision basis for the development of forest tourism resources and environmental protection. Hainan is an important tropical area in China, and the tropical forest resources are rich. Hainan forest tourism is not only in the country. In the forest tourism system, it occupies an important position and has great potential for development. Therefore, it is very important for the sustainable development of the forest tourism in Hainan to carry out the research on the tourism carrying capacity of the Forest Park in Hainan. First, the research is summarized and summarized by the related literature on the research of the carrying capacity of forest tourism at home and abroad. The related concepts, definitions, composition and evaluation methods of forest tourism carrying capacity; secondly, based on the related theories of forest tourism carrying capacity evaluation, 1 national and 1 city county-level Forest Park are selected in Hainan as an empirical case, specifically for the seven Xian Ling hot spring national Forest Park in Hainan and Sanya Yalong Bay tropical paradise. Survey and questionnaire survey, calculate and evaluate the tourist carrying capacity of the case scenic area; finally, combining theoretical research and empirical case study, from the aspect of the direction of the maximum carrying capacity and the control of tourist flow, the paper puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions on the spatial carrying capacity, economic load capacity and social carrying capacity of the Forest Park in Hainan. The results show that: (1) the spatial carrying capacity of tourism resources: according to the topography characteristics and layout patterns of the seven Xian Ling hot spring national Forest Park and Yalong Bay tropical paradise Forest Park, the spatial bearing capacity of the seven Xian Ling hot spring countries is calculated by the linear model, and the spatial bearing capacity of the instantaneous resources of the seven Xian Ling hot springs is 2765. The force is 8295 people; the spatial carrying capacity of the instantaneous resource space of Yalong Bay tropical paradise Forest Park is 10000 people, and the daily rational resource space carrying capacity is 20000 people. (2) the tourist economic bearing capacity: according to the survey result of the sampling survey on tourists, the parking space and the number of public toilet are selected to evaluate the bearing capacity of the demonstration case scenic area, seven Xian Ling temperature. The instantaneous facilities bearing capacity of the park of the spring national Forest Park is 109, the carrying capacity of the daily reasonable facilities is 6650, the carrying capacity of the public toilet facilities is 11475 and 5100, so the daily reasonable economic carrying capacity of the park is 5100, and the instantaneous facilities carrying capacity of the Yalong Bay Park's Forest Park park are 284 vehicles, and the daily reasonable facilities carrying capacity of 8746 people. The carrying capacity of the toilet facilities is 54000 people and 24000 people, so the reasonable economic carrying capacity of its day is 8746 people. (3) the social carrying capacity of tourist Society: two case scenic spots are far away from the urban area, and the residents in the vicinity of the scenic spot are less. The Forest Park tourism has not had a negative impact on the local residents and work production. On the contrary, it has promoted the local society to a certain extent. With the development of the economy, local residents generally affirm and welcome the tourist activities of Forest Park. Their residents' psychological bearing capacity can be regarded as infinity. The tourist experience satisfaction of four aspects of vision, hearing, touch and action is regarded as the evaluation index, and the most sensitive feelings of tourists are weighted. On this basis, the seven Xian Ling is calculated. The psychological bearing capacity of the instantaneous tourists in the hot spring national Forest Park is 1525, the psychological carrying capacity of the Japanese tourists is 4575, the instantaneous most suitable psychological bearing capacity is 730, and the psychological bearing capacity of the most suitable tourists is 2190. The psychological bearing capacity of Yalong Bay's Forest Park's instantaneous tourists is 9721, and the psychological carrying capacity of the Japanese tourists is 19 442 people, the instantaneous optimum tourist psychological bearing capacity is 1968 people, and the most suitable tourist psychological bearing capacity is 3936. Therefore, the reasonable social carrying capacity of the seven Xian Ling hot spring national Forest Park and Yalong Bay tropical paradise Forest Park is 4575 and 19442 respectively. (4) an empirical case analysis: from the view of the tourist space carrying capacity, the seven Xian Ling hot spring countries The space carrying capacity of home Forest Park and Yalong Bay tropical paradise Forest Park is quite different, mainly due to the layout pattern of scenic spots, the layout of the route route and the different direction of the tour route. From the bearing capacity of the tourist facilities, the seven Xian Ling hot spring countries are obviously worse than the tropical paradise. The evaluation time of 4A level scenic area has great influence. Seven Xian Ling hot spring national Forest Park is late in development time, insufficient infrastructure investment and poor carrying capacity of tourism facilities. At present, the psychological bearing capacity of residents has not become the limiting factor for the development of Forest Park in the seven Xian Ling hot Spring National Forest Park and Yalong Bay tropical paradise, and the tourists' Psychology There are great differences in carrying capacity, especially the most suitable psychological bearing capacity difference, mainly due to the difference in the way tourists travel in two scenic spots, in the tourist destination, the stay time is also obviously different, the tourist satisfaction degree is different. (5) the countermeasures and suggestions: for the 2 cases of tourism carrying capacity measurement and comparative analysis, for Sen On the one hand, the control of tourism carrying capacity of Forest Park, on the one hand, by raising the maximum carrying capacity of the scenic area, including improving the capacity of space and facilities and improving the psychological bearing capacity of the residents and tourists; on the other hand, establishing the control of the linkage system of tourist flow control, including the external system of the government and the internal system control of the interior of the scenic area.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F592.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李東瑾;畢華;;中國(guó)國(guó)家森林公園旅游景區(qū)時(shí)空演變特征及其驅(qū)動(dòng)因素分析[J];旅游研究;2016年05期

2 李東瑾;畢華;;中國(guó)國(guó)家森林公園旅游景區(qū)空間結(jié)構(gòu)研究[J];中國(guó)人口·資源與環(huán)境;2016年S1期

3 熊鷹;;生態(tài)旅游承載力研究進(jìn)展及其展望[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2013年05期

4 尹新哲;李菁華;雷瑩;;森林公園旅游環(huán)境承載力評(píng)估——以重慶黃水國(guó)家森林公園為例[J];人文地理;2013年02期

5 劉佳;于水仙;王佳;;濱海旅游環(huán)境承載力評(píng)價(jià)與量化測(cè)度研究——以山東半島藍(lán)色經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)為例[J];中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境;2012年09期

6 肖隨麗;賈黎明;杜建軍;唐殿珂;汪平;李江婧;;北京市香山公園和鷲峰森林公園游憩承載力對(duì)比研究[J];北京林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

7 王秋虹;;用文化改革發(fā)展引領(lǐng)國(guó)際旅游島建設(shè)——《中共海南省委、海南省人民政府關(guān)于加快推進(jìn)文化改革發(fā)展的決定》亮點(diǎn)品讀[J];今日海南;2010年11期

8 程火生;呂弼順;崔哲浩;倪曉嬌;張晶;;長(zhǎng)白山地區(qū)生態(tài)旅游環(huán)境承載力與可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究[J];延邊大學(xué)農(nóng)學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

9 董成森;熊鷹;覃鑫浩;;張家界國(guó)家森林公園旅游資源空間承載力[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2008年10期

10 章小平;朱忠福;;九寨溝景區(qū)旅游環(huán)境容量研究[J];旅游學(xué)刊;2007年09期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 嚴(yán)歡;夏圣雪;張杰;程建新;;風(fēng)景區(qū)旅游空間容量和旅游心理容量測(cè)定研究——以烏鎮(zhèn)西柵景區(qū)為例[A];中國(guó)風(fēng)景園林學(xué)會(huì)2014年會(huì)論文集（上冊(cè)）[C];2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 韋健華;基于游客體驗(yàn)的森林公園旅游承載力評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2014年

2 雷瑩;森林公園的環(huán)境承載力評(píng)估和環(huán)境價(jià)值計(jì)量研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2010年

3 李豐生;生態(tài)旅游環(huán)境承載力研究[D];中南林學(xué)院;2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張麗英;基于景觀格局與承載力的森林旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2062557