本文選題：HSE + 石化企業(yè)��； 參考：《上海應(yīng)用技術(shù)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：石化行業(yè)的生產(chǎn)過程,具有高濕高壓、易燃易爆的工藝特點,部分產(chǎn)品有毒有害,且廢水、廢氣、固體廢棄物的排放種類多、數(shù)量大、成份復(fù)雜,需要的環(huán)境容量較大,容易出現(xiàn)環(huán)境安全問題。環(huán)境質(zhì)量的好壞,不僅影響石化企業(yè)的正常運行,而且會影響到員工的身心健康。特殊的生產(chǎn)工藝特征,還使石化企業(yè)面臨比較大的“鄰避沖突”風(fēng)險。石化企業(yè)需要在擴大生產(chǎn)規(guī)模與員工身體健康、設(shè)備安全運行以及環(huán)境保護(hù)這樣的多重矛盾中做出選擇。實施健康、安全和環(huán)境管理體系(以下簡稱HSE),使解決這些矛盾成為可能。提升安全生產(chǎn)、綠色生產(chǎn)的意識,建立健全企業(yè)的健康、安全和環(huán)境管理制度,提高企業(yè)環(huán)境質(zhì)量,是實施HSE管理體系進(jìn)行環(huán)境管理的最終目的。在國家和企業(yè)自身的大力推動下,石化企業(yè)的環(huán)境管理已經(jīng)初見成效。對環(huán)境管理績效進(jìn)行評價,是實施HSE管理體系的內(nèi)在要求,也是檢查HSE管理體系在石化企業(yè)實施成效的重要方法。但是如何建立合適的指標(biāo)體系,確保環(huán)境管理績效評價的客觀性和實用性,是實施HSE管理體系應(yīng)深入研究的問題。在總結(jié)傳統(tǒng)績效評價指標(biāo)體系的基礎(chǔ)上,本文根據(jù)目前石化企業(yè)HSE管理體系對環(huán)境管理的要求,依據(jù)可持續(xù)發(fā)展、鄰避、企業(yè)社會責(zé)任、利益相關(guān)者等相關(guān)理論和石化企業(yè)的生產(chǎn)特點,綜合考慮影響石化企業(yè)環(huán)境質(zhì)量的內(nèi)外因素,篩選形成了包含3個一級指標(biāo)、9個二級指標(biāo)、28個三級指標(biāo)的環(huán)境管理績效評價指標(biāo)體系。通過層次分析法,確定了各分級指標(biāo)的權(quán)重,使得設(shè)計出的評價指標(biāo)體系具有較強的針對性和可操作性。運用所建立的評價指標(biāo)體系,對南京兩家石化企業(yè)2015年的環(huán)境管理績效作了綜合評價。分析評價結(jié)果,可以得出結(jié)論:兩家公司在環(huán)境管理上都投入了較大精力,在企業(yè)生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營過程和環(huán)境管理過程中,注重環(huán)境、經(jīng)濟、社會的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展,綜合表現(xiàn)良好。A公司的治理指標(biāo)值和效率指標(biāo)值均為8.87, B公司的治理指標(biāo)值和效率指標(biāo)值均為8. 67;效率指標(biāo)中權(quán)重較大的單位耗能產(chǎn)值比率和能源有效利用率,A公司均為2. 32,B公司均為2. 27。為了提高單位耗能產(chǎn)值比率和能源有效利用率,從環(huán)境管理中獲得較高的經(jīng)濟收益和社會效益,針對石化企業(yè)今后的環(huán)境管理工作,本文提出如下建議:一是持續(xù)改進(jìn)生產(chǎn)工藝,從源頭上降低能耗、提高企業(yè)的能源使用水平。二是不斷加大環(huán)保投入,力爭實現(xiàn)生產(chǎn)過程能源消耗和污染排放的全程檢測和控制。三是深入推進(jìn)節(jié)能降耗,建立企業(yè)有效的能源管理和環(huán)境管理組織體系,增加新能源的使用比例。四是加快推進(jìn)資源綜合利用,大力倡導(dǎo)、推行循環(huán)經(jīng)濟和清潔生產(chǎn),提高“三廢”的綜合利用水平。
[Abstract]:The production process of petrochemical industry has the characteristics of high humidity and high pressure, flammable and explosive. Some products are poisonous and harmful, and there are many kinds of waste water, waste gas and solid waste, such as large quantity, complex components and large environmental capacity. Environmental safety problems are easy to occur. The environmental quality not only affects the normal operation of petrochemical enterprises, but also affects the physical and mental health of employees. The special characteristics of production process also make petrochemical enterprises face the risk of avoiding conflict. Petrochemical enterprises need to choose between the expansion of production scale and the health of employees, the safe operation of equipment and environmental protection. The implementation of health, safety and environmental management systems (HSEs) makes it possible to resolve these contradictions. Improving the consciousness of safe production and green production, establishing and perfecting the health, safety and environment management system of enterprises, and improving the environmental quality of enterprises are the ultimate goals of implementing HSE management system to carry out environmental management. Under the impetus of the country and the enterprises themselves, the environmental management of petrochemical enterprises has achieved initial results. Evaluating the performance of environmental management is the inherent requirement of implementing HSE management system, and it is also an important method to check the effectiveness of HSE management system in petrochemical enterprises. However, how to establish an appropriate index system to ensure the objectivity and practicability of environmental management performance evaluation is a problem that should be deeply studied in the implementation of HSE management system. On the basis of summing up the traditional performance evaluation index system, according to the requirements of HSE management system for environmental management in petrochemical enterprises at present, this paper bases on sustainable development, adjacent avoidance, corporate social responsibility. Relevant theories such as stakeholders and the production characteristics of petrochemical enterprises are taken into account synthetically the internal and external factors that affect the environmental quality of petrochemical enterprises. The index system of environmental management performance evaluation was formed, which included 3 first class indexes, 9 second class indexes and 28 third grade indexes. Through the analytic hierarchy process, the weight of each grade index is determined, which makes the evaluation index system have strong pertinence and maneuverability. The environmental management performance of two petrochemical enterprises in Nanjing in 2015 was comprehensively evaluated by using the evaluation index system. By analyzing the evaluation results, we can draw the conclusion that the two companies have invested more energy in the environmental management, and have paid attention to the coordinated development of the environment, economy and society in the process of production and operation of the enterprises and in the environmental management process. The comprehensive performance. A company's governance index value and efficiency index value are both 8.87, B company's governance index value and efficiency index value are both 8. 7. The ratio of unit energy consumption to output value and the efficiency of energy utilization in the efficiency index are both 2. 5%. 32B companies are all 2. 5%. 27. In order to improve the ratio of unit energy consumption to output value and the efficiency of energy utilization, and to obtain higher economic and social benefits from environmental management, this paper aims at the future environmental management of petrochemical enterprises. The following suggestions are put forward in this paper: one is to continuously improve the production process, reduce energy consumption from the source, and improve the energy use level of enterprises. Second, increasing environmental protection investment to realize the whole detection and control of energy consumption and pollution emission in production process. Third, promote energy conservation and reduce consumption, establish an effective energy management and environmental management organization system, and increase the proportion of new energy use. Fourth, speed up the comprehensive utilization of resources, vigorously advocate, promote recycling economy and cleaner production, and improve the comprehensive utilization level of the "three wastes."
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海應(yīng)用技術(shù)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F426.72

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟偉;孫啟宏;;試論生態(tài)文明建設(shè)背景下我國環(huán)境管理制度創(chuàng)新[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2015年01期

2 頡茂華;劉艷霞;王晶;;企業(yè)環(huán)境管理信息披露現(xiàn)狀、評價與建議——基于72家上市公司2010年報環(huán)境管理信息披露的分析[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2013年02期

3 陸軍;趙學(xué)濤;楊威杉;;企業(yè)環(huán)境管理會計核算框架與方法研究[J];中國環(huán)境管理;2012年06期

4 李淑英;;利益相關(guān)者理論視野中的企業(yè)社會責(zé)任[J];教學(xué)與研究;2010年06期

5 房巧玲;劉長翠;肖振東;;環(huán)境保護(hù)支出績效評價指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建研究[J];審計研究;2010年03期

6 許紅星;;我國能源利用現(xiàn)狀與對策[J];中外能源;2010年01期

7 何艷玲;;“中國式”鄰避沖突:基于事件的分析[J];開放時代;2009年12期

8 李曉暉;;城市鄰避性公共設(shè)施建設(shè)的困境與對策探討[J];規(guī)劃師;2009年12期

9 董小林;袁玉卿;孫建美;夏少輝;;建設(shè)項目全程環(huán)境管理制度體系構(gòu)建[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2009年09期

10 王立君;;基于利益相關(guān)者理論的企業(yè)社會責(zé)任體系的構(gòu)建[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2009年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉佳;基于生態(tài)文明理念的中國省級環(huán)境績效評估實證研究[D];南開大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 邵華;紡織企業(yè)環(huán)境業(yè)績評價指標(biāo)體系優(yōu)化研究[D];寧波大學(xué);2012年

2 賈向琳;居住區(qū)生態(tài)環(huán)境評價指標(biāo)體系研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1898905