小產(chǎn)權(quán)房法律問題的困境與出路
[Abstract]:As a special product of the dualistic system of land in our country, the small property house is not a standard legal concept from the legal level. In recent years, with the rapid rise in the price of urban commercial housing, low-priced small property houses have become more and more popular among low-income groups in cities, and small property houses in various places have also begun to take on a vigorous development trend. According to the current laws and regulations of our country, there are certain legal obstacles to the recognition of the legal status of the small property right house, and its existence has certain rationality, which has aroused the heated discussion of the problem of the small property right house in the academic circles. Moreover, as the scale of small property houses becomes larger and larger, the contradictions highlighted therein are becoming more and more acute. It is urgent to deal with the problem of small property houses. The Ministry of Land and Resources has also made the issue of "cleaning up small property houses" one of the key points of this year's work. And will choose a few cities as a pilot city to clean up small property rights. Therefore, the study of the problem of small property rights has a certain theoretical significance, but also has a strong practical significance. This paper is mainly divided into three parts: the first part mainly expounds the connotation and types of small property housing. Starting from the difference between "small property right" and "township property right", this paper clarifies the definition of the connotation of small property right house, points out the basic standard of judging small property right house, and then on this basis, according to different angles, This paper classifies the small property house differently, and expounds the significance of the classification of the small property house. The second part mainly discusses the background reason of the production of the small property house and the controversy and analysis of the legal status of the small property house in academic circles. In fact, the small property house is produced under the background of the rapid development of urbanization and the continuous prominent land value in our country. Because there are many reasons to promote the production of the small property house, these reasons are summed up as realistic reasons in this paper. Three aspects of important causes and root causes are analyzed, which pave the way for solving the problem of small property right. At the same time, this chapter also summarizes the academic community on the legal status of small property rights main points of view, and put forward their own views. The third part mainly expounds the legal dilemma that the small property house faces and probes into how to solve the problem of the small property house reasonably. According to the current legal system of our country, the legal difficulties faced by small property houses mainly include: conflicts in legislation, problems in real rights, the validity of contracts of sale and purchase in creditor's rights, and the inheritance of small property houses. Other legal issues such as regulation. The reason why there are so many legal dilemmas of small property right houses is that they have been on the edge of our country's legal system. They are not unconstitutional but also violate some legal systems, which have both rationality and harmfulness in their existence. Therefore, it is imperative to deal with such a legal grey area as soon as possible. This is the exploration carried out in the second part of this chapter. To explore the solution to the problem of small property rights of the path. In order not to take a detour in the process of dealing with the problem of small property houses, firstly, according to the basic conditions of our country and the current situation of small property houses, four basic principles are put forward. Under the guidance of these principles, the author analyzes how to deal with the existing small property right house reasonably, and finally explores the basic measures to solve the problem of small property right house from the legal system level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D922.3;D923
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李磊;;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房動了誰的奶酪?[J];政府法制;2007年17期
2 鄧如山;;開發(fā)商小產(chǎn)權(quán)房可否“準(zhǔn)生”[J];法人雜志;2009年07期
3 吳學(xué)安;;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”面臨重重法律風(fēng)險[J];城市開發(fā);2007年24期
4 王娟;王楠;;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房:不能一拆了之——宋莊畫家村房屋糾紛案引起的思考[J];法治論壇;2008年03期
5 孫欣;;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房突圍法律?[J];政府法制;2009年10期
6 晏揚(yáng);;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房背后的大問題[J];政府法制;2007年17期
7 唐明;王惠林;;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”何去何從[J];浙江人大;2007年08期
8 沈曉杰;;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房“違法”爭論背后的利益博弈[J];今日中國論壇;2007年09期
9 鄧紅陽;;鄭州如何突破“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”法律難題[J];法人雜志;2008年11期
10 胡紅莖;;淺析小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的法律問題[J];中國鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè);2010年06期
相關(guān)會議論文 前10條
1 呂學(xué)昌;邱晨;;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”問題初探——由“格林小鎮(zhèn)”被拆引發(fā)的思考[A];規(guī)劃創(chuàng)新:2010中國城市規(guī)劃年會論文集[C];2010年
2 李衍;王華瑞;許烈鈞;;淺析對小產(chǎn)權(quán)房建設(shè)的處理辦法[A];第十三屆中國科協(xié)年會第17分會場——城鄉(xiāng)一體化與“三農(nóng)”創(chuàng)新發(fā)展研討會論文集(下)[C];2011年
3 何景春;;我國小產(chǎn)權(quán)房產(chǎn)生的原因與對策[A];陜西省《資本論》研究會2008年學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2008年
4 楊學(xué)芳;;對小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的法律癥結(jié)與處理辦法的思考[A];全國律協(xié)經(jīng)濟(jì)專業(yè)委員會2010論壇(成都)論文集[C];2010年
5 何曉風(fēng);;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房問題研究[A];全國律協(xié)經(jīng)濟(jì)專業(yè)委員會2010論壇(成都)論文集[C];2010年
6 葉名怡;;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房困境的法律突圍——堅(jiān)持與妥協(xié)[A];2009年民商法學(xué)博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇論文摘要集[C];2009年
7 蘇艷英;;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”的困境與出路[A];2009年民商法學(xué)博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇論文摘要集[C];2009年
8 李志明;;空間政治學(xué)視角下小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的成因機(jī)制解析[A];轉(zhuǎn)型與重構(gòu)——2011中國城市規(guī)劃年會論文集[C];2011年
9 徐平;;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房屢禁不止的法律探析[A];2009中華全國律師協(xié)會經(jīng)濟(jì)專業(yè)委員會年會論文集[C];2009年
10 王林生;梅洪常;;影響商品房價格因素分析——以重慶市為例的實(shí)證分析[A];中國企業(yè)運(yùn)籌學(xué)[2010(1)][C];2010年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 記者 周元春 翁惠娟 秦小艷;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房不能一拆了事[N];深圳特區(qū)報(bào);2010年
2 早報(bào)評論專欄作者 經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)博士 馬紅漫;對小產(chǎn)權(quán)房不再統(tǒng)一處理意味著什么[N];東方早報(bào);2009年
3 深圳特區(qū)報(bào)記者 譚建偉;商品房限購 小產(chǎn)權(quán)房走俏[N];深圳特區(qū)報(bào);2011年
4 王曉欣;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)”房鄭州仍然很火[N];河南日報(bào);2007年
5 本報(bào)記者 劉筱晨;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房再興風(fēng)浪[N];中國房地產(chǎn)報(bào);2009年
6 記者 馬如娟;整治在即 “小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”何去何從[N];甘肅經(jīng)濟(jì)日報(bào);2010年
7 單士兵;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”是對市場與法律的雙重倒逼[N];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)時報(bào);2007年
8 本報(bào)記者 王海;百姓為啥買小產(chǎn)權(quán)房[N];市場報(bào);2007年
9 主持人 封壽炎 (解放日報(bào)見習(xí)記者 )嘉 賓 尹伯成(復(fù)旦大學(xué)房地產(chǎn)研究中心主任 教授);小產(chǎn)權(quán)房何去何從?[N];房地產(chǎn)時報(bào);2009年
10 本報(bào)評論員 李銀;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的名“亡”與實(shí)“存”[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2009年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 江奇;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”購買行為研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年
2 程其明;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房規(guī)制政策研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2010年
3 林雙鳳;城市居民的住房資源獲得研究[D];中山大學(xué);2012年
4 闕彬;房地產(chǎn)市場供求非均衡分析[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
5 李相范;土地違法行為的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年
6 范春梅;重大風(fēng)險情境下房地產(chǎn)消費(fèi)者的購買決策和樓層選擇行為研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2011年
7 易曉文;我國住房價格波動的作用機(jī)制與福利效應(yīng)研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年
8 王媛;基于實(shí)物期權(quán)理論的土地出讓、項(xiàng)目開發(fā)與分期銷售時機(jī)決策研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年
9 鮑小飛;房地產(chǎn)市場泡沫的形成和預(yù)警[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2005年
10 熊方軍;我國房地產(chǎn)市場分類宏觀調(diào)控研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 王文竹;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房法律問題分析及其對策研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2011年
2 劉丹;經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)軌時期的小產(chǎn)權(quán)房問題研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年
3 陳朵朵;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房交易法律問題研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年
4 王玉臻;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房法律問題探析[D];延邊大學(xué);2010年
5 邵璞;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”的法制問題研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2010年
6 陳君偉;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房合法化研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年
7 段高祥;產(chǎn)權(quán)何以能小[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年
8 樊玉林;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房問題的法律思考[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年
9 張惠;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房合法化路徑探究[D];中山大學(xué);2010年
10 霍慧敏;小產(chǎn)權(quán)房法律問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號:2222191
本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/falvlunwen/tudifa/2222191.html