本文選題：共產(chǎn)黨 + 醒獅派�。� 參考：《湖北社會科學》2017年07期

【摘要】：作為在大革命期間聲勢僅次于國民黨、共產(chǎn)黨的"第三黨",醒獅派以《醒獅》周刊為輿論工具,大力鼓吹"國家主義"。大革命前后,他們與早期共產(chǎn)黨人圍繞國家、社會、革命激烈地爭論。就雙方國家觀而言,醒獅派堅持絕對的國家觀,他們認為革命的目的在于爭取國家的獨立和統(tǒng)一,其國家觀帶有很強的抽象和本體論色彩。共產(chǎn)黨人同樣以擺脫壓迫、追求獨立統(tǒng)一為目的,但他們反對視國家為抽象之物,注重通過具體的革命實踐,以"社會"重建"國家",這種國家觀超越了"國家"與"社會"的二元對立,代表著一種新的政治觀產(chǎn)生,也因應了新文化運動中知識群體核心話語的轉(zhuǎn)變。在一定意義上,這兩種不同的政治觀,可以部分解釋兩者一敗一成的歷史命運。
[Abstract]:As the "third party" of the Communist Party, which was second only to the KMT during the Great Revolution, the lion dance group used Lion Dance Weekly as a tool of public opinion and vigorously advocated "nationalism."Before and after the Great Revolution, they and the early Communists debated fiercely about the country, society and revolution.As far as the state views of both sides are concerned, the Lion Dance School adheres to the absolute state view. They believe that the aim of the revolution is to strive for the independence and unity of the country, and its concept of state has a strong abstract and ontological color.The Communists also aim at getting rid of oppression and pursuing independence and unity, but they oppose the idea that the state is regarded as an abstract thing and pay attention to the concrete revolutionary practice.To reconstruct "country" by "society", this state view transcends the dualistic opposition between "state" and "society", represents the emergence of a new political view, and also responds to the transformation of the core discourse of knowledge groups in the New Culture Movement.In a sense, these two different political views can partly explain their historical fate.
【作者單位】： 清華大學人文學院;
【分類號】：K262

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 張圻福;論醒獅派[J];蘇州大學學報;1982年S1期

2 孫承希;醒獅派之集體意識與道德社會的追求[J];史林;2003年02期

3 鄭大華;曾科;;論20年代醒獅派的文化保守主義[J];聊城大學學報(社會科學版);2012年04期

4 朱其永;;醒獅派國家主義再評析[J];青海師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年05期

5 洪廷彥;“醒獅派”的國家主義[J];史林;1986年03期

6 朱其永;;國家認同抑或階級認同:國家主義與共產(chǎn)主義之爭評析[J];黨史研究與教學;2012年03期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 孫承希;醒獅派的國家主義思想之演變[D];復旦大學;2003年

，

本文編號：1751265