發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-29 11:19

【摘要】：天然氣目前已經(jīng)廣泛用于居民的生活當(dāng)中,其儲(chǔ)存的安全性也日益成為關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn),對(duì)天然氣泄漏事故進(jìn)行理論分析和數(shù)值模擬研究,可以掌握其擴(kuò)散過(guò)程、規(guī)律和危害范圍,為消防減災(zāi)提供一些指導(dǎo)依據(jù)。本文主要運(yùn)用理論分析和數(shù)值模擬結(jié)合的方法進(jìn)行分析,理論上分析了儲(chǔ)罐區(qū)的危險(xiǎn)性,并利用道化學(xué)指數(shù)評(píng)價(jià)法進(jìn)行儲(chǔ)罐區(qū)安全評(píng)價(jià),分析可能存在的事故以及事故的影響因素,結(jié)合實(shí)際情況,確定相關(guān)參數(shù),利用高斯煙羽模型計(jì)算出不同泄漏孔徑下的天然氣危害范圍;文章根據(jù)分析出的影響因素,采用FLACS軟件模擬對(duì)比不同泄漏速率、不同溫度和不同風(fēng)速情況下,得出天然氣儲(chǔ)罐泄漏擴(kuò)散的變化情況以及天然氣泄漏擴(kuò)散的完整過(guò)程,選定事故場(chǎng)景,得出泄漏擴(kuò)散的危害范圍和爆炸超壓的變化,并針對(duì)特定場(chǎng)景提供應(yīng)急處置方案。文章根據(jù)天然氣的理化性質(zhì)進(jìn)行危險(xiǎn)性分析危險(xiǎn)源辨識(shí),確定該儲(chǔ)罐區(qū)已構(gòu)成重大危險(xiǎn)源,運(yùn)用火災(zāi)、爆炸危險(xiǎn)指數(shù)法對(duì)儲(chǔ)罐區(qū)進(jìn)行安全評(píng)價(jià),得出儲(chǔ)罐區(qū)發(fā)生災(zāi)害后的后果,計(jì)算得出儲(chǔ)罐區(qū)的危害半徑為54.8m,危害面積為9439.5m2。分析影響泄漏擴(kuò)散的因素,并根據(jù)實(shí)際情況,選取長(zhǎng)方形泄漏孔,泄漏位置為罐底H=2.5m處,根據(jù)大氣穩(wěn)定度選定擴(kuò)散系數(shù),代入高斯煙羽模型,得到在泄漏孔徑為101mm、80mm和20mm時(shí),最大危害距離分別為15m、9m和5m。軟件模擬得出不同時(shí)刻天然氣泄漏的狀態(tài),分析出天然氣擴(kuò)散過(guò)程主要包括紊流噴射、浮力上升和湍流擴(kuò)散。以天然氣爆炸下限5%作為危險(xiǎn)邊界,在典型氣象條件下,氣體危害區(qū)域最高可達(dá)56m,在風(fēng)向方向,逆風(fēng)方向最大可達(dá)7.5m,順風(fēng)方向最大可達(dá)46.5m,危險(xiǎn)面積為1591m2,同時(shí)得到整個(gè)空間的危害體積為40462m3;在夏季氣象條件下,氣體危害區(qū)域最高可達(dá)34m,危險(xiǎn)面積為949m2,同時(shí)得到整個(gè)空間的危害體積為18997m3;在冬季條件下,云團(tuán)寬度最大值為30m,最長(zhǎng)長(zhǎng)度為28m,順風(fēng)方向15m,逆風(fēng)方向13m,氣體危害區(qū)域最高可達(dá)38m,最大危害體積為26847m3。通過(guò)在不同時(shí)間和不同地點(diǎn)進(jìn)行點(diǎn)火,得到超壓低于儲(chǔ)罐的工作壓力1Mpa,同時(shí)低于可對(duì)人體造成傷害的lOOKpa,在該模擬條件下,不會(huì)引起周?chē)鷥?chǔ)罐破裂,從而引起更大的事故。
[Abstract]:At present, natural gas has been widely used in the daily life of residents, and the safety of its storage has increasingly become the focus of attention. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation study on natural gas leakage accidents can master its diffusion process, laws and harm scope. To provide some guidance for fire prevention and disaster reduction. In this paper, the method of combining theoretical analysis with numerical simulation is used to analyze the danger of tank area, and the method of chemical index evaluation is used to evaluate the safety of tank area. Based on the analysis of the possible accidents and the influencing factors of the accidents, combined with the actual situation, the relevant parameters are determined, and the harm range of natural gas under different leakage aperture is calculated by using Gao Si smoke plume model. According to the analysis of the influencing factors, the paper uses FLACS software to simulate and compare the different leakage rate, different temperature and different wind speed, and obtains the variation of the leakage diffusion of natural gas storage tank and the complete process of natural gas leakage diffusion. The damage range of leakage and diffusion and the change of explosion overpressure are obtained by selecting the accident scene, and the emergency treatment scheme is provided for the specific scenario. According to the physical and chemical properties of natural gas, hazard analysis hazard source identification is carried out in this paper, and it is determined that the tank area has already constituted a major hazard source. The fire and explosion hazard index method is used to evaluate the safety of the tank area, and the consequences of the disaster in the tank area are obtained. The calculated results show that the damage radius of the tank area is 54.8 m and the damage area is 9439.5 m ~ 2. The factors affecting leakage diffusion are analyzed. According to the actual situation, the rectangular leak hole is selected, the leakage location is at 2.5 m at the bottom of the tank, the diffusion coefficient is selected according to the atmospheric stability, and Gao Si's smoke plume model is added to the model, and the leakage aperture is 101 mm. The maximum harm distances of 80mm and 20mm were 15m and 5m, respectively. The state of natural gas leakage at different times is obtained by software simulation. It is analyzed that the diffusion process of natural gas mainly includes turbulent jet buoyancy rising and turbulent diffusion. Taking the lower limit of natural gas explosion as the dangerous boundary, under typical meteorological conditions, the maximum hazardous area of gas can be up to 56m, in the wind direction, the upwind direction is 7.5m, the maximum downwind direction is 46.5m, and the dangerous area is 1591m2. At the same time, the damage volume of the whole space is 40462m3; Under the weather condition in summer, the maximum gas hazard area is 34m, and the dangerous area is 949m2.At the same time, the damage volume of the whole space is 18997m3. Under winter conditions, the maximum width of cloud cluster is 30m, the longest length is 28m, the direction of downwind is 15m, the direction of counterwind is 13m, the maximum area of gas damage is 38m, and the maximum harm volume is 26847m3. By igniting fire at different time and place, the working pressure of overpressure is lower than that of storage tank (1MPA), and the working pressure is lower than that of lOOKpa, which can cause harm to human body. Under this simulated condition, the tank around the tank will not break down, thus causing more accidents.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TE88

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃有波;董炳燕;呂淑然;楊凱;;天然氣管道泄漏孔形狀對(duì)噴射火影響模擬研究[J];中國(guó)安全科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年07期

2 關(guān)麗;劉德俊;周志強(qiáng);;天然氣管道泄漏爆炸實(shí)驗(yàn)分析[J];中國(guó)安全生產(chǎn)科學(xué)技術(shù);2014年12期

3 褚新穎;;天然氣火災(zāi)爆炸現(xiàn)場(chǎng)勘驗(yàn)及痕跡特征的討論[J];消防科學(xué)與技術(shù);2014年04期

4 夏登友;錢(qián)新明;黃金印;姜連瑞;段在鵬;;液氨泄漏擴(kuò)散模擬及危害評(píng)估[J];中國(guó)安全科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

5 馮西平;張宏;;天然氣儲(chǔ)罐泄漏后燃燒爆轟性分析[J];廣東化工;2014年05期

6 趙文芳;萬(wàn)古軍;張廣文;張毅;;重大危險(xiǎn)源定量風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估實(shí)例解析[J];安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào);2013年05期

7 董影超;宋文華;謝飛;;液化石油氣發(fā)生沸騰液體擴(kuò)展蒸氣爆炸的事故分析[J];南開(kāi)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年01期

8 賈玉蓮;王鳳英;;油罐噴射火燃燒模擬[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2011年02期

9 孫志強(qiáng);;壓縮天然氣貯罐的危險(xiǎn)性評(píng)價(jià)及安全對(duì)策[J];甘肅科技;2009年23期

10 王兆芹;馮文興;程五一;;高壓輸氣管道噴射火幾何尺寸和危險(xiǎn)半徑的研究[J];安全與環(huán)境工程;2009年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 ;陜西遭遇今冬以來(lái)溫度最低值[N];陜西日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉建輝;天然氣儲(chǔ)運(yùn)關(guān)鍵技術(shù)研究及技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[D];華南理工大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 王亞莉;北京某5000m~3LNG儲(chǔ)罐安全性分析研究[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

2 付川琦;中國(guó)天然氣行業(yè)投資研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年

3 楊曉欣;CNG加氣站儲(chǔ)氣罐安全評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2012年

4 田靚;天然氣管道火災(zāi)爆炸后果危害評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國(guó)石油大學(xué);2011年

5 秦政先;天然氣管道泄漏擴(kuò)散及爆炸數(shù)值模擬研究[D];西南石油大學(xué);2007年

6 弋明濤;池火與噴射火聯(lián)合作用下液化氣儲(chǔ)罐的熱及力學(xué)響應(yīng)研究分析[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2297550