發(fā)布時間：2018-03-09 00:04

  本文選題：西部地區(qū)　切入點：產(chǎn)業(yè)抑制　出處：《西北大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：西部大開發(fā)以來,國家加大了對西部地區(qū)的投資和政策支持力度,西部地區(qū)經(jīng)濟增速有明顯的提高。但和東部地區(qū)相比,差距并沒有縮小。尤其是西部地區(qū)的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展仍然較多的依賴資源型行業(yè)的增長,人們預期的東西產(chǎn)業(yè)轉移也沒有大規(guī)模發(fā)生,產(chǎn)業(yè)整體發(fā)展演進較為緩慢。本文即試圖尋找西部產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展滯后的原因,并提出解決思路。 就各國的實踐經(jīng)驗來看,產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展有內(nèi)生和外生兩種主要模式。我國在改革開放前后分別實踐過這兩種模式,并取得了不同的經(jīng)濟績效。本文首先對我國的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展歷程加以回顧,由歷史分析得出西部地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展困境的成因和各種表現(xiàn),并提出“產(chǎn)業(yè)抑制”這一概念來表征西部產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展滯后的狀態(tài)。 目前,東部地區(qū)以OEM為主的加工工業(yè)較多地依賴外商投資和國外市場,使得東部地區(qū)長期處于產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈低端,產(chǎn)業(yè)升級的瓶頸效應已經(jīng)非常明顯。對于西部地區(qū)而言,產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展不宜再簡單復制東部的發(fā)展模式,而應該注重提高自身產(chǎn)業(yè)的內(nèi)生發(fā)展能力。本文認為,產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)生發(fā)展應是以具有自生能力的本地企業(yè)為主體,以本地市場為依托,具備自我發(fā)展能力的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展方式。產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)生發(fā)展應以比較優(yōu)勢為起點,以持續(xù)的知識創(chuàng)新和制度創(chuàng)新,推動外生比較優(yōu)勢向內(nèi)生比較優(yōu)勢和競爭優(yōu)勢轉化。基于這一定義,本文建立了一個指標體系,利用主成分分析法對我國各省份的產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)生發(fā)展能力進行評價,并對西部地區(qū)的評價結果進行重點分析。 由于西部地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)抑制是一種封閉的自我循環(huán)狀態(tài),靠內(nèi)部力量很難突破這一體系。所以西部產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)生發(fā)展機制的建立必須堅持對外開放,依靠外力打破原有的均衡,以經(jīng)濟增量激活本地經(jīng)濟存量,構建國內(nèi)價值鏈則是實現(xiàn)這一過程的可行思路。結合產(chǎn)業(yè)結構、技術創(chuàng)新制度創(chuàng)新等方面的政策安排,西部地區(qū)方能逐步擺脫產(chǎn)業(yè)抑制的陷阱,實現(xiàn)產(chǎn)業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Since the development of the western region, the state has increased its investment and policy support to the western region, and the economic growth rate in the western region has increased significantly. But compared with the eastern region, The gap has not narrowed. In particular, the economic development in the western region is still more dependent on the growth of resource-based industries, and the expected transfer of east-west industries has not taken place on a large scale. The paper tries to find out the reason why the industrial development of western China lags behind, and puts forward some ideas to solve the problem. From the practical experience of various countries, there are two main modes of industrial development: endogenous and exogenous. China has practiced these two models before and after the reform and opening up. Firstly, this paper reviews the history of industrial development in China, and draws the causes and manifestations of the industrial development dilemma in the western region from the historical analysis. And put forward the concept of "industry inhibition" to characterize the state of industrial development lag in western China. At present, the processing industry in eastern China, which is dominated by OEM, relies more on foreign investment and foreign markets, which makes the eastern region in the low end of the industrial chain for a long time, and the bottleneck effect of industrial upgrading is very obvious. The industrial development should not simply copy the development model of the east, but should pay attention to improving the endogenous development ability of its own industry. This paper holds that the endogenous development of the industry should be based on the local enterprises with the ability of self-growth and the local market. The industrial development mode with self-development ability should take comparative advantage as the starting point and promote the transformation from exogenous comparative advantage to endogenous comparative advantage and competitive advantage with continuous knowledge innovation and institutional innovation. In this paper, an index system is set up to evaluate the endogenous development ability of industries in various provinces of China by using principal component analysis, and the evaluation results in western China are analyzed emphatically. Since the industrial repression in the western region is a closed self-circulation state, it is difficult to break through this system by internal forces. Therefore, the establishment of the endogenous development mechanism of the western industry must adhere to the opening up and rely on external forces to break the original equilibrium. Activating the local economic stock with economic increment and constructing the domestic value chain are the feasible ideas to realize this process. Combining with the policy arrangement of industrial structure, technological innovation and institutional innovation, the western region can gradually get rid of the trap of industrial restraint. To realize the sustainable development of industry.
【學位授予單位】：西北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F127

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐彰;張超;;產(chǎn)業(yè)革命、主導產(chǎn)業(yè)的形成與政策選擇——基于英國、美國、日本工業(yè)化早期階段的經(jīng)驗研究[J];財政研究;2006年06期

2 丁祥生;張巖貴;;貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)略選擇:一般情形與大國情形[J];國際商務(對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學學報);2007年04期

3 劉訓華;滕光進;;西部地區(qū)承接產(chǎn)業(yè)轉移的條件、路徑及其政策分析[J];中國發(fā)展觀察;2009年12期

4 劉志彪;張杰;;全球代工體系下發(fā)展中國家俘獲型網(wǎng)絡的形成、突破與對策——基于GVC與NVC的比較視角[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2007年05期

5 陳建軍;黃潔;陳國亮;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚間分工和地區(qū)競爭優(yōu)勢——來自長三角微觀數(shù)據(jù)的實證[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2009年03期

6 張少軍;劉志彪;;全球價值鏈模式的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉移——動力、影響與對中國產(chǎn)業(yè)升級和區(qū)域協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的啟示[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2009年11期

7 張廣婷;江靜;陳勇;;中國勞動力轉移與經(jīng)濟增長的實證研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2010年10期

8 白永秀;吳振磊;;我國30年經(jīng)濟體制改革的歷史回顧與經(jīng)驗總結[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2008年11期

9 任曉紅;;內(nèi)生比較優(yōu)勢與我國西部地區(qū)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的主導產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2010年03期

10 郭克莎;對中國外貿(mào)戰(zhàn)略與貿(mào)易政策的評論[J];國際經(jīng)濟評論;2003年05期

，

本文編號：1586113