本文選題：社區(qū)矯正 + 社會(huì)化改造��； 參考：《社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線》2015年05期

【摘要】：英國(guó)社會(huì)法學(xué)派代表斯賓塞認(rèn)為:"社會(huì)因素是誘發(fā)犯罪的原因,將罪犯置于社會(huì)進(jìn)行監(jiān)管,在社會(huì)內(nèi)部化解罪惡,可節(jié)省執(zhí)法資源,減少再犯罪可能。"1950年后,社區(qū)矯正在罪犯社會(huì)化思潮推動(dòng)下由孕育轉(zhuǎn)入各國(guó)實(shí)踐。我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正適用較晚,經(jīng)歷了一段實(shí)踐過(guò)程,于2011年通過(guò)的《刑法修正案(八)》正式確立社區(qū)矯正制度,其規(guī)定"對(duì)宣判管制、緩刑、假釋及被剝奪政治權(quán)利在社會(huì)服刑的犯罪人依法實(shí)行社區(qū)矯正"。但《刑法修正案(八)》對(duì)于社區(qū)矯正的執(zhí)行主體未做明確規(guī)定,對(duì)此一直存在爭(zhēng)議,理論上主要有三種觀點(diǎn):由公安機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)行、由司法行政部門執(zhí)行或設(shè)立全新機(jī)構(gòu)執(zhí)行。然而依據(jù)行刑權(quán)統(tǒng)一性觀點(diǎn),多數(shù)學(xué)者贊同由司法行政部門執(zhí)行。除上述執(zhí)行主體爭(zhēng)議外,我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正制度還存在著管理方法滯后、社區(qū)基礎(chǔ)不成熟、專業(yè)力量不足等問(wèn)題。因此,通過(guò)對(duì)社區(qū)矯正理論與實(shí)踐問(wèn)題的研究,在我國(guó)建立風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理模式、合理化管理體系、高科技管理手段等社區(qū)矯正監(jiān)管方式,可進(jìn)一步深化與完善我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正制度,更好地幫助罪犯社會(huì)化改造,預(yù)防再犯罪,實(shí)現(xiàn)法治國(guó)家、和諧社會(huì)的夢(mèng)想。
[Abstract]:Spencer, a representative of the British School of Social Law, said: "Social factors are the cause of crime. Putting criminals under the supervision of society and defusing evil within society can save law enforcement resources and reduce the possibility of reoffending." after 1950, Community correction is promoted by the socialization of criminals from gestation to national practice. Our country community correction is applied late, has experienced a period of practice process, the "Criminal Law Amendment (8)" adopted in 2011 formally establishes the community correction system, its stipulation "to sentence the sentence control, the suspended sentence," Offenders who are paroled and deprived of their political rights in the society shall carry out community correction in accordance with the law. " However, the Criminal Law Amendment (8) does not clearly stipulate the subject of community correction, which has always been controversial. In theory, there are three main viewpoints: execution by public security organs, execution by judicial administrative departments or establishment of new institutions. However, according to the unity of execution power, most scholars agree that execution should be carried out by judicial administrative department. In addition to the above disputes, there are still some problems in our community correction system, such as lagging management methods, immature community foundation and insufficient professional strength. Therefore, through the study of the theory and practice of community correction, the establishment of risk management model, rational management system, high-tech management means and other ways of community correction supervision in China, can further deepen and improve our community correction system. Better help criminals socialize reform, prevent crime, realize the dream of a country ruled by law and harmonious society.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院;河北民族師范學(xué)院法政系;
【分類號(hào)】：D926.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉愛(ài)童;;社區(qū)矯正法律制度探究——以城市社區(qū)為視角[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年06期

2 董麗君,謝高仕;國(guó)外行刑社會(huì)化及我國(guó)行刑社會(huì)化之完善[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫秀艷;刑罰權(quán)限制思想的歷史考察及思考[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李燕玲;;我國(guó)監(jiān)獄行刑社會(huì)化的若干問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年32期

2 姜蘭昱;;和諧社會(huì)視野中的青少年犯罪社區(qū)預(yù)防[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

3 馬進(jìn)保;王唯;;我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正執(zhí)行程序探討[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

4 郭銳林;;被脅迫犯罪淺論[J];廣東廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

5 賈濟(jì)東;趙秉志;;我國(guó)犯罪構(gòu)成理論體系之完善[J];法商研究;2014年03期

6 王慧;賈密;;懲治性侵害未成年人犯罪的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境與制度轉(zhuǎn)型[J];法律適用;2014年08期

7 劉艷紅;;我國(guó)犯罪論體系之變革及刑法學(xué)研究范式之轉(zhuǎn)型[J];法商研究;2014年05期

8 張光君;;社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新引領(lǐng)未成年人社區(qū)矯正向“整合模式”發(fā)展[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2014年04期

9 張光君;;刑事政策視野中我國(guó)未成年人社區(qū)矯正聯(lián)動(dòng)機(jī)制的發(fā)展脈絡(luò)和方向[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2014年01期

10 林亞剛;黃鵬;;社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新視閾下的社區(qū)矯正檢視[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 曾，

本文編號(hào)：2048375