發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-19 13:40

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 微信公眾號(hào) 轉(zhuǎn)載 侵權(quán)責(zé)任　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：進(jìn)入21世紀(jì)以來(lái),通訊技術(shù)迅猛發(fā)展,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的普及與智能手機(jī)的出現(xiàn)開啟了一個(gè)人人都是“麥克風(fēng)”的自媒體時(shí)代。在這一波洶涌的自媒體浪潮中,2011年由騰訊公司開發(fā)的即時(shí)通訊類軟件——微信,無(wú)疑是其中最大的贏家。其開發(fā)的微信公眾號(hào)成為了繼微博、博客之后的又一個(gè)更加火爆的自媒體創(chuàng)作平臺(tái)。然而,隨著用戶數(shù)量的不斷增長(zhǎng),在這一平臺(tái)上也衍生出了一系列著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題。因此,為了更好的解決這些問題,本文將對(duì)微信公眾平臺(tái)中侵犯著作權(quán)的主要問題——轉(zhuǎn)載侵權(quán)問題進(jìn)行分析、探討,并結(jié)合我國(guó)著作權(quán)法和信息傳播條例等相關(guān)法律法規(guī),綜合運(yùn)用案例分析法、比較分析法、價(jià)值分析法對(duì)微信公眾號(hào)的轉(zhuǎn)載侵權(quán)問題進(jìn)行分析論述,并對(duì)微信平臺(tái)中著作權(quán)保護(hù)中存在的問題提出自己的觀點(diǎn)和建議,以期更好的解決該問題。本文主要分為三大部分,分別為引言、正文和結(jié)論。第一部分:提出問題,闡明現(xiàn)今時(shí)代微信轉(zhuǎn)載侵權(quán)問題日益增多、嚴(yán)重,應(yīng)該給予充分重視和探討;第二部分:分析問題,通過(guò)與傳統(tǒng)媒體比較,總結(jié)微信公眾號(hào)轉(zhuǎn)載行為的侵權(quán)特點(diǎn),并且對(duì)于微信公眾號(hào)中的轉(zhuǎn)載行為所侵犯的著作權(quán)進(jìn)行逐個(gè)分析;接下來(lái),鑒于其新媒體平臺(tái)的獨(dú)特性,結(jié)合法律規(guī)定中的合理使用制度、法定許可制度和默示許可制度對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)載侵權(quán)行為是否能適用這些免責(zé)事由進(jìn)行分析,從而確定這些行為應(yīng)該承擔(dān)怎樣的侵權(quán)責(zé)任。在侵權(quán)責(zé)任承擔(dān)中,責(zé)任主體主要有微信公眾號(hào)的運(yùn)營(yíng)者(微信公眾號(hào)版主)和騰訊公司,并且,騰訊公司作為網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商,其在承擔(dān)責(zé)任過(guò)程中對(duì)“避風(fēng)港原則”和“紅旗原則”的適用也是本文探討的重點(diǎn)。最后,綜合前文論述與微信公眾號(hào)的傳播特點(diǎn),本文發(fā)現(xiàn),微信公眾號(hào)轉(zhuǎn)載侵權(quán)問題愈演愈烈與在立法中現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)在保護(hù)這一新的侵權(quán)形態(tài)上的滯后性和在司法過(guò)程中舉證責(zé)任分配、證據(jù)保全制度不合理、救濟(jì)方式不完善等方面都有很大關(guān)聯(lián)。因此,本文在文章的最后對(duì)這些問題逐一的進(jìn)行了分析,并結(jié)合所學(xué)知識(shí)從立法層面和司法層面分別提出了著作權(quán)保護(hù)建議,以期更好的保護(hù)微信公眾號(hào)中的著作權(quán)。第三部分即文章的結(jié)論部分,文章在這一部分總結(jié)了全文,提出了期待和展望。
[Abstract]:Since 21th century, the rapid development of communication technology, the popularity of the Internet and the emergence of smart phones opened a "microphone" self-media era. In this wave of self-media wave. WeChat, an instant messaging software developed by Tencent in 2011, was no doubt the biggest winner. Its WeChat Official account became the successor to Weibo. Blog after another more popular from the media creation platform. However, with the number of users growing, in this platform also derived a series of copyright infringement issues. In order to solve these problems better, this paper will analyze and discuss the main problem of copyright infringement in WeChat public platform-reprint infringement. And combined with the copyright law and information dissemination regulations and other related laws and regulations, comprehensive use of case analysis, comparative analysis, value analysis of WeChat Official account reprint infringement analysis. And on the WeChat platform in the copyright protection problems put forward their own views and suggestions in order to better solve this problem. This paper is divided into three parts, respectively. Text and conclusion. The first part: put forward the question, expound the current times WeChat reprint infringement problem is increasing day by day, serious, should give full attention and discuss; The second part: analyze the problem, compare with the traditional media, summarize the infringement characteristics of the reprint behavior of WeChat Official account, and analyze the copyright infringed by the reprint behavior in Official account WeChat one by one; Next, in view of the uniqueness of its new media platform, combining with the reasonable use system in the legal provisions, the legal license system and the implied license system analyze whether the reprint infringement can be applied to these reasons. In order to determine these acts should bear what kind of tort liability. In tort liability, the main body of responsibility is WeChat Official account operator (WeChat Official account moderator) and Tencent company. Tencent as an Internet service provider, its responsibility in the process of "safe haven principle" and "Red Flag principle" is also the focus of this paper. Finally. Synthesizing the previous discussion and WeChat Official account's communication characteristics, this paper found. WeChat Official account reprint tort problem intensified in the legislation of existing laws and regulations in the protection of this new form of tort lag and the distribution of the burden of proof in the judicial process, evidence preservation system is unreasonable. The way of relief is not perfect and other aspects are very relevant. Therefore, at the end of the article, this paper analyzes these problems one by one. And combined with the knowledge learned from the legislative level and judicial level respectively put forward suggestions for copyright protection in order to better protect the copyright in WeChat Official account. The third part is the conclusion of the article. In this part, the article summarizes the full text, and puts forward expectations and prospects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 梁詩(shī)Pr;論自媒體環(huán)境下著作權(quán)保護(hù)[D];暨南大學(xué);2015年

2 唐然;微信公眾平臺(tái)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為及責(zé)任認(rèn)定[D];北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1444434