【摘要】：古漢語(yǔ)"國(guó)學(xué)"一詞特指最高統(tǒng)治者設(shè)立的、履行國(guó)家教育行政職能及國(guó)立學(xué)校教學(xué)職能的政府機(jī)構(gòu)。與帝王之制及統(tǒng)治思想的演化相匹配,國(guó)學(xué)的規(guī)制規(guī)模不斷演化,依據(jù)教學(xué)內(nèi)容及核心教材的主要學(xué)術(shù)特征,國(guó)學(xué)大體分為華夏元典、諸子經(jīng)典、儒家經(jīng)典三種時(shí)代性歷史類(lèi)型,而儒家經(jīng)典類(lèi)型國(guó)學(xué)的演化歷程可以分為五經(jīng)諸派、五經(jīng)統(tǒng)合、四書(shū)為宗三個(gè)歷史階段。從戰(zhàn)國(guó)經(jīng)秦漢至隋唐再到明清,帝制的演化經(jīng)歷了形成、確立、鼎盛、衰亡四個(gè)階段,而帝制國(guó)學(xué)的演化也相應(yīng)經(jīng)歷了諸子經(jīng)典、五經(jīng)諸派、五經(jīng)統(tǒng)合、四書(shū)為宗四個(gè)階段。自從四書(shū)之學(xué)占據(jù)了絕對(duì)統(tǒng)治地位后,帝制便隨之日漸衰落。由此可見(jiàn),國(guó)學(xué)衰變與帝制衰亡的關(guān)系是一個(gè)值得深入探討的重大課題。
[Abstract]:The word "Chinese studies" in ancient Chinese refers to the government institutions established by the supreme rulers to perform the administrative functions of national education and the teaching functions of state schools. Matching with the evolution of imperial system and ruling thought, the scale of regulation of Sinology is constantly evolution. according to the main academic characteristics of teaching content and core teaching materials, Sinology is generally divided into three historical types: Huaxia Yuan Dian, the classics of Confucianism and Confucian classics, while the evolution of Confucian classics can be divided into three historical stages: the five scriptures, the integration of the five classics and the four books. From the warring States period through the Qin and Han dynasties to the Sui and Tang dynasties to the Ming and Qing dynasties, the evolution of the imperial system experienced four stages: formation, establishment, prosperity and decline, and the evolution of the imperial system of China also experienced four stages: the classics of the five classics, the integration of the five scriptures and the four books. Since the study of the four books occupied an absolute dominant position, the monarchy has declined day by day. Thus it can be seen that the relationship between the decline of Chinese studies and the decline of imperial system is an important subject worthy of further discussion.
【作者單位】： 南開(kāi)大學(xué)高等教育研究所暨校史研究室;天津社會(huì)科學(xué)雜志社;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B22
，

本文編號(hào)：2510780